Has Ann Coulter jumped the shark?

[Erika1487]

I love me some Ann Coulter like her or not, she is one of the most direct, acerbic and brutally witty pundits alive today.
In Ann's new book, Never trust a liberal over three - especially a republican Ann attempts to describe the ideological division presently shredding the Republican party. To my dismay, a large portion of the content of this book were from her previously written columns - some as many as six or seven years old. Sadly I find her book format has become predictable and stale.

[trish]

Has Ann Coulter jumped the shark?

About ten years ago at least.

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/b...f_treason.html

[robertlouis]

Only pity is that the shark missed her.

[dderek123]

She's awful. Another republican clown that gives other republicans a bad name.

[Ben in LA]

She's awful. Another republican clown that gives other republicans a bad name.

Only republicans?

[dderek123]

Only republicans?

Well I guess so. But she could also bring shame to news media in general. Because they keep having her on TV to spout her "controversial" opinions. She's like an internet troll but for the news media. Except certain groups of people actually believe and appreciate her views. When really she's just a clown that they throw on TV to get ratings because her ignorant ramblings are pleasing ignorant people. That's a scary thought.

[Prospero]

Ann Coulter might be prettier but in terms of her moral outlook she belongs in a gallery with these ladies...

Yes... they are all war criminals who guarded inmates in Nazi concentration camps.

[martin48]

Is this the asshole who suggested that ionising radiation is a cure for cancer?

http://www.humanevents.com/2011/03/1...t-on-radiation

Please put her at the heat of the Chernobyl reactor

[trish]

Just like Ann to quote (but not actually link or cite) a 2001 newspaper article (rather than a scientific journal) to support a dangerous, lame-brain, homeopathic notion that she was trying to float in 2011. Why did she have to go back ten years to find (and then not actually cite) a source that only sort of supports (I won't say "her position", but rather)her pose? Answer: she needed to find an allegedly liberal source...the NYT...because if even a liberal paper supported her loony libertarian cause, it must be right! True the NYT opinion page is liberal. But the science section...not so much...not even a little bit.

[martin48]

All ionising radiation damages DNA - we use it in radiotherapy to stop cancerous cells multiplying. For healthy tissue, it damages DNA causes mutations which in turn can cause secondary cancers. Full stop.

Enjoy this