How "aspirational" should porn be?

[suttonporksword]

Now generally speaking most girls (both TG and GG) who do porn are of the very attractive model type, highly preened and made up. There is also the more amatuer style porn which generally features the sort of girl you can bump into in the supermarket.

So my question is (and it doesnt even have a single answer so i dont expect any thank yous for posting this) do you prefer porn which presents the first type of girl, the model looks, the type you can dream about fucking, or do you prefer something more like the kind of girl you could actually end up fucking? Personally i am much more the latter, partly because the sex portraid in these types of scenes dont feel as scripted as some of the mainline porn. Just my view of course!

[LilyRox]

I think this borders of the lines of maintenance/surgery vs. more natural looks. Over surgery can be very bad. Depends a lot on the amateur's too. That can vary a lot in looks. I think there's more realism and erotic feeling to seeing a HIGHLY attractive "amateur" (if that's what you want to call it. Personally anyone highly attractive isn't an amateur in my book regardless of porn history) on webcam vs a high def photo shoot glammed up girl. It also depends on what you're born with. Some people are just born with good proportions. Some people look fine without makeup and some people NEED it. Makeup can only do so much.

[EvaCassini]

"Amateur" and "Pro" aren't "rankings" for girls. They are the "style" in which a porn is shot.

Amateur porn is shot with cheapo cams and phones and such. Bad to "ok" lighting and it has the whole "DIY" feel to it. Also the "graininess" feel as well.

Pro porn is shot with decent to high end cameras and the lighting is such to where there is no starkness and off-putting fallen shadows. The subject ( model ) will be shown in the most perfect of lighting that she looks her best.

Either amateur or pro can be done with great, high end cameras and perfect lighting. It's only a style.

[LilyRox]

I get confused sometimes because some people refer to all cam girls as amateur's when there are many professional girls out there with high def cameras, good lighting, and maintenance. I guess the confusing thing about this question is the level of amateur. They vary so much and it's kind of an opinion on what's amateur and what's not. Maybe the question should be girls in professional porn vs solo webcam girls.

[bluesoul]

Now generally speaking most girls (both TG and GG) who do porn are of the very attractive model type, highly preened and made up. There is also the more amatuer style porn which generally features the sort of girl you can bump into in the supermarket.

So my question is (and it doesnt even have a single answer so i dont expect any thank yous for posting this) do you prefer porn which presents the first type of girl, the model looks, the type you can dream about fucking, or do you prefer something more like the kind of girl you could actually end up fucking? Personally i am much more the latter, partly because the sex portraid in these types of scenes dont feel as scripted as some of the mainline porn. Just my view of course!

ummm the "model type" girls you mention in your first sentence are actually amateur girls who've had a semi-professional makeup job. technically, a production company will actually spend a decent amount of money on makeup/styling, lights and camera so their models look better and thus, make their product better. amateur porn doesn't spend as big a budget (if any) and this is the discrepancy you see in models.

as far as which porn i prefer: it depends on my mood

[EvaCassini]

To give a little more enlightening...

Lily, your shoot with Shemaleyum was "Pro" style. Taken by a "professional" photographer.

Your "Preview" DIY clips are "amateur" style. Because of the way it's shot.

In reference to the OP about his question, I'll break it down and explain.

"Now generally speaking most girls (both TG and GG) who do porn are of the very attractive model type, highly preened and made up. There is also the more amatuer style porn which generally features the sort of girl you can bump into in the supermarket. ( Look has nothing to do with the "style it is shot in. I have done many "Pro" styled shoots for many production companies, but I am still "labeled" as "the girl next door" type of look. )

So my question is (and it doesnt even have a single answer so i dont expect any thank yous for posting this) do you prefer porn which presents the first type of girl, the model looks, the type you can dream about fucking, or do you prefer something more like the kind of girl you could actually end up fucking? Personally i am much more the latter, partly because the sex portraid in these types of scenes dont feel as scripted as some of the mainline porn. Just my view of course!" ( Doesn't matter how "made up" the girl is or how many surgeries she's had, guys are going to "dream" about fucking her AND be able to fuck her IRL, because most of us escort, AND I am pretty sure that "said girl" goes grocery shopping or gets petrol in her car at the same 7/11 you go to.

As for scripting in either amateur or pro porn style, there's still some planning involved, regardless of which style said porn is shot in. In "pro" styling, there is more involved with planning and "amateur" style is basically "I got an idea, lets fuck on cam, and la di da di da, blah, blah, this position, that position, but just get into it and forget the camera is there. Lets just have our normal sexuals, but lets film it." <---- That's it, that's amateur.

In Pro, you'll notice the model's view is mostly on the camera right? Because said model is "Looking at you". Bringing you into the fantasy )



Sry for the length lol But that's pretty much a nut-shelled explanation.

[LilyRox]

Lily, your shoot with Shemaleyum was "Pro" style. Taken by a "professional" photographer.

Your "Preview" DIY clips are "amateur" style. Because of the way it's shot.

I know. I was talking about professional webcam girls. My lighting sucks.

[EvaCassini]

There are no "professional web cam girls". I don't do it much anymore but I used to cam ALL DAY, EVERY DAY...that's how I got my boobjob.

Either way you look at "camming", it's style, regardless of the girl, is amateur styling. I cam, Jamie cams, Kelly Shore cams, Wendy Williams cams, and many many others. Because the cam being used is a webcam, and the lighting is more or less house lamps is why any "cam girl's" video will look "amateur".

Now there are girls, like myself, who, when we cam, have "Pro" style lighting and our cam and computer are just so, that the quality is much much higher then some cam girl camming from PI, Singapore, Brazil, or even Antarctica.

[LilyRox]

There are no "professional web cam girls". I don't do it much anymore but I used to cam ALL DAY, EVERY DAY...that's how I got my boobjob.

Either way you look at "camming", it's style, regardless of the girl, is amateur styling. I cam, Jamie cams, Kelly Shore cams, Wendy Williams cams, and many many others. Because the cam being used is a webcam, and the lighting is more or less house lamps is why any "cam girl's" video will look "amateur".

Now there are girls, like myself, who, when we cam, have "Pro" style lighting and our cam and computer are just so, that the quality is much much higher then some cam girl camming from PI, Singapore, Brazil, or even Antarctica.

Yeah that's what I meant. I don't get how a HD webcam, with "pro" lighting, "pro" makeup and being seductive into the camera is considered amateur.

I mean there's girls that make thousands doing that.

[EvaCassini]

reason why camming is "amateur" is because there is no "professional" photographer, and technically it's not really porn, more like "interactive fun time with a girl who wants money."