YOU MUST ENTER A MESSAGE WHEN POSTING...

[Danielle Foxxx]

YOU MUST ENTER A MESSAGE WHEN POSTING...

[George Costanza]

Why was my questionable argument deleted from this Forum?
I am not following you guys...Seriously... This is an honest concern that we should all adress. It is a hot topic that needs to be adressed.

I do not agree with Lady Boy content...

If you continue to allow this on this Forum then I have no other option but not to support you or your company.

I understand that exploiding children in poor countries is a big things these days, but child pornography is WRONG!

You need a new filtration system for your picture postings

How do you know that the people are underage? I looked at the photos and didn't think that ther girls were that young.

[plainBob]

Darn run to the store for cigs and i miss the fireworks.

[houstonshemalefan]

Danielle,

Just because a ladyboy "looks" young does not mean that she is underage! In TS terms, just because you look like a 100% beautiful woman does not mean that you are 100% woman!

For the record, I'm not into the ladyboys and do agree they "look" young but if they are over 18 then they have the right to do whatever they want.

[George Costanza]

Your whole approach seems to be very shallow and self serving, with no facts to back it up.

Exactly my sentiments.

What is your agenda Danielle?

[Onyx]

They didn't seem to be to young for me either. Those pic's are from a professional site, that is marked with thier logo, which seems to be legit.

Is thier some other reason you don't like the ladyboys?? Taking to much business from your site perhaps...

Your whole approach seems to be very shallow and self serving, with no facts to back it up.

damn haha

[plainBob]

Ms.Foxx does have a point some . and i mean some not all.. but some of the ladyboys in thailand start their transformation at very young ages. And a lot of people go there for the sole purpose of sleeping with underage kids. There been a few in the news. I did not see the pics that where posted so i am not going to say either way if it is or is not. But it seems to me that if the pics had a logo of a site on them than they are more than like not childporn. And as for them takeing business from Ms. Foxx I don't think so. She more than likely just stateing her concerns. If you remember she stated she herself was a victim of child abuse. So show some backbone and don't attack her.

[Onyx]

Ms.Foxx does have a point some . and i mean some not all.. but some of the ladyboys in thailand start their transformation at very young ages. And a lot of people go there for the sole purpose of sleeping with underage kids. There been a few in the news. I did not see the pics that where posted so i am not going to say either way if it is or is not. But it seems to me that if the pics had a logo of a site on them than they are more than like not childporn. And as for them takeing business from Ms. Foxx I don't think so. She more than likely just stateing her concerns. If you remember she stated she herself was a victim of child abuse. So show some backbone and don't attack her.

I don't know what you're trying to say. Unless she knows for a fact that any pictures on here are of underage models, she has no point whatsoever.

[George Costanza]

I did not see the pics that where posted so i am not going to say either way if it is or is not. But it seems to me that if the pics had a logo of a site on them than they are more than like not childporn.

I believe this is the link... http://www.hungangels.com/board/view...782&highlight=

[Danielle Foxxx]

YOU MUST ENTER A MESSAGE WHEN POSTING...