Male Pornstars in shape or not in shape?

[EvaCassini]

Lmmfao!!!!!!!

[Prospero]

Offensiveness One is the course one member of this forum excelled in.

[LilyRox]

I forget how new you are here. See, I'm Jamie French and I call you whatever I want. That's how that works. Kid. I never went to college, I have very little respect and I'm calling you kid. That's a thing that is happening and you now have to live with it.

Not having a thing is not the same as having the opposite thing. Are you sure you went to college? You're taking the wrong courses. Unless you're taking semantics murder. If so, you're acing that.

I see Jamie French. Well, I typically have more manners than to refer to someone like that. I personally haven't been called a "kid" in years by anyone else. No matter your age I would never call someone "old" to their face. Seeings your lack of manners I'm not surprised you think you know everything.


Umm... yes I'm sure. Are you sure you know what semantics means?

It's just like saying:

"I didn't expect it to rain today, but it did."

If I did not expect to rain today what did I expect it not to do? Rain today.

Thus,

"I expected it not to rain today, but it did."

here's another one:

"I didn't think it would rain today, but it did."

What did you think it would not do?

"I thought it would not rain today, but it did."

It's just a different type of wording.


"Not having a thing is not the same as having the opposite thing."

You're right, but that's not what it is.

It's basically saying

if ab = c

ba = c

I think it's important to know this if you truly think they hold different meanings.

[GroobyKrissy]

Websters dictionary defines irony as: "the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning "

I literally do not like ugly dudes in my porn. What did I say that was ironic, having explained my preference with complete sincerity? So go ahead... explain yourself.

I'm just going to post this because you're once again being a douche, thinking you understand something you don't.

Ryz was indirectly calling YOU ugly (i.e. - you don't like ugly people in porn, but in his mind, you are one - and doing porn). THAT was the irony.

I don't agree with the sentiment obviously, but if you're going to get stupid with people, and start calling them out, make sure YOU understand their stupidity first. Get mad at him for calling you ugly... not for what YOU THINK, because you missed the point, is improper usage of a term you failed to grasp. The usage of the "irony" was fine based on his opinion.

[GroobyKrissy]

Actually, to be technically accurate... He is calling you an, 'ugly dude'. Get mad about that.

To give you credit though, your second 'call-out' is somewhat correct. So...there's that.

[EvaCassini]

Here we go again........ SMH

[Jamie French]

And your interpretation of what the dude said is more accurate than mine because? Seems to me if his comment is open to interpretation then not enough info was given in his original comment. Exactly why I asked him to explain himself.

What's your deal anyhow? Fuck off already.

I'm just going to post this because you're once again being a douche, thinking you understand something you don't.

Ryz was indirectly calling YOU ugly (i.e. - you don't like ugly people in porn, but in his mind, you are one - and doing porn). THAT was the irony.

I don't agree with the sentiment obviously, but if you're going to get stupid with people, and start calling them out, make sure YOU understand their stupidity first. Get mad at him for calling you ugly... not for what YOU THINK, because you missed the point, is improper usage of a term you failed to grasp. The usage of the "irony" was fine based on his opinion.

[Jamie French]

Rationalizing your fuck up after the fact? Typical for a kid. You initially said you held no expectations. No means no. None. No doesn't mean expectations not worth mentioning.

You'll just have to drop it kid. I don't ever stop.

I see Jamie French. Well, I typically have more manners than to refer to someone like that. I personally haven't been called a "kid" in years by anyone else. No matter your age I would never call someone "old" to their face. Seeings your lack of manners I'm not surprised you think you know everything.


Umm... yes I'm sure. Are you sure you know what semantics means?

It's just like saying:

"I didn't expect it to rain today, but it did."

If I did not expect to rain today what did I expect it not to do? Rain today.

Thus,

"I expected it not to rain today, but it did."

here's another one:

"I didn't think it would rain today, but it did."

What did you think it would not do?

"I thought it would not rain today, but it did."

It's just a different type of wording.


"Not having a thing is not the same as having the opposite thing."

You're right, but that's not what it is.

It's basically saying

if ab = c

ba = c

I think it's important to know this if you truly think they hold different meanings.

[LilyRox]

According to your definition you are still wrong. You DID NOT expect Christian to respond. So nothing about his response contradicted your expectation, for there was no expectation. (Re-read what you wrote.)

I have a feeling people abuse the word irony because coincidence is hard to spell.

Straight from the horse's mouth.

I did not expect Christian to respond.

I expected Christian to not respond.

It's not fixing my mistake. It's just common sense

[GroobyKrissy]

And your interpretation of what the dude said is more accurate than mine because? Seems to me if his comment is open to interpretation then not enough info was given in his original comment. Exactly why I asked him to explain himself.

What's your deal anyhow? Fuck off already.

You should not be calling people, "kid" when you, yourself are a petulant child.

So, it is OK for YOU to go around, strutting like a peacock, telling other people how stupid they are but when someone does it to you (and RIGHTFULLY SO)... you can't handle it...? Childish.

It isn't open to interpretation. YOU MISSED THE IRONY. The fact that you think irony is open to interpretation in the first place demonstrates you don't fully understand the word. Something IS or ISN'T ironic. His STATEMENT IS ironic (for the reasons already mentioned)...

SOMETHING CEASES to be "ironic" if you explain it... that is the whole point of "irony". It is a way of stating something... without stating it directly. I already explained the irony in Ryz's comment. Like it or not (and I don't), IT IS THERE, which makes your little preening session... ridiculous.

So, continue your little dance of how great and how smart and how perfect you are. You've been proven wrong in this case and any reasonable person with an understanding of irony knows it.

Look, Jamie, I wouldn't have even posted in the first place except you were begging to be smacked down with your preening, while totally missing the ACTUAL IRONY in Ryz's comment. Fine, one person uses the term [somewhat] incorrectly... and that gives you the right to jump all over them and call them "kid" and be a general douche?

You were asking to be straightened out, you were, and can't handle it. End of story.