Pornstars from the past vs Pornstars from the present

[sissycrossdresser]

Pornstars from the past vs Pornstars from the present

[Willie Escalade]

I prefer the ones from the present. No offense, but many from the distant past (i.e. the early 80s) really don't do anything for me. Girls such as Venus Lux, Chanel Couture, and Annalise Rose get my motor running more.

[youngblood61]

I prefer the girls from the present. So many more girls today!

[Sulka_bewitched_me]

As far as TS ladies are concerned the present set are WAY more appealing BUT as far as GG are concerned the 80's and early 90's were better than todays lot. Back then when a girl did anal it was hot, nasty and pretty much taboo as you rarely saw it in mainstream porn. Today anal is all too commonplace with todays performers (again talking about mainstream porn here) and although I'm still aroused by an anal scene, it doesn't hold that "forbidden pleasure" mystique that it once had.

[RallyCola]

first off...it depends on what the "past" is

if past is 70s-90s, clearly the present is far superior. if present is 2012/3 vs like 5 years ago...i'm indifferent.

i do find, however, that some more recent debuts are supplanting old faves. Case in point, extremely popular girls that I used to love, though they still have prolific careers, when the years have not been kind, i tend to move on.

[TSPornFan]

I prefer today's top girls such as Eva Lin, Sarina Valentina, and Venus Lux. The past's girls weren't my type.

[mac.B]

Honestly, I've been feeling like the girls from the early 2000's have everyone beat. I just like the whole "classy, sexy" aesthetic that was going on back then. Todays scene is more about young and raunchy. These early 2000's girls just look dam near perfect. Just look at the Allanah Starr party treads. This excludes Thai ladyboys who seem to get better with every generation.

[JenniferParisHusband]

The first lady I saw was in the 80's. That was Sulka on the playboy channel (There was a TS birthday card at a local record shop, a little before that, but really it was Sulka). And from there it was any picture I or movie I coudl get my hands on. There was on BBS service (Windy City) that used to have a lot of photos. And I downloaded a lot of them. I still have a little bit of a thing for Sulka, but admittedly she's a little rough around the edges. Not nearly as sculpted and perfected as a lot of today's ladies are.

There are things about both past and present I like. I am not a tattoo guy, so I really hate that almost every model I look at these days seems to have them, not so crazy about the tiny body with the enormous ass look that is popular now these days either. That said, I think that today the ladies are generally more beautiful then they were in the past. I'd just rather have the 70's, 80's and early 90's style back.

That said, here are some faves, just to help push the debate along.

[Nikka]

eva robins shit I remember that scanned magazine

[RallyCola]

all of the older material is interesting to look at for nostalgia, but even the 2 girls that got me really interested, megan chavalier and kim devine really don't do much for me anymore. it isn't a matter of age at all...i just don't even look at their old stuff anymore because more modern girls have a more "evolved" look