Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 93
  1. #21
    Senior Member Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    303

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by tsdvdman View Post
    Then it should put a significant halt to "Tranny Chasing" as we currently know it

    http://www.christianpost.com/news/st...ave-hiv-93462/
    Tranny chasing has never been safer (since the AIDS crises hit). These numbers are no surprise.

    Here's some other statistics for you.

    http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/

    In 2011, in the United States, MSM accounted for 79% of 38,825 estimated HIV diagnoses among all males aged 13 years and older and 62% of 49,273 estimated diagnoses among all persons receiving an HIV diagnosis that year.
    http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/...ssRelease.html

    Approximately one in five (19 percent) men who have sex with men (MSM) in a study of 21 major U.S. cities is infected with HIV, and nearly half (44 percent) of those men are unaware of their infection, according to a new analysis from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In the study, young MSM and MSM of color were least likely to know their HIV status. The findings were published today in CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

    As an FYI, for those who don't know, MSM includes us. Or at least those of us who have a dick and are sexually active with someone else with a dick (I guess post-ops are out of the high risk pool).

    Fortunately, HIV is very preventable. Use a condom every single time. And if the prospect of having sexual contact with someone who may have an STD terrifies you; you shouldn't be chasing anything. Stick with celibacy or monogamy.



  2. #22
    Senior Member Silver Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    东安格利亚切姆斯福德
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    witthestilt said: As an FYI, for those who don't know, MSM includes us. Or at least those of us who have a dick and are sexually active with someone else with a dick (I guess post-ops are out of the high risk pool).
    __________________________________________________ ______________________________________Darling no matter sex or gender STD u can catch anyway if the person its ill.



  3. #23
    Senior Member Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    303

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by tsadriana View Post
    witthestilt said: As an FYI, for those who don't know, MSM includes us. Or at least those of us who have a dick and are sexually active with someone else with a dick (I guess post-ops are out of the high risk pool).
    __________________________________________________ ______________________________________Darling no matter sex or gender STD u can catch anyway if the person its ill.
    That's true, but your risk within certain groups is dramatically greater than with others. That is obvious. If you always use a condom it shouldn't matter. But there is a sea of difference between having unprotected sex in the heterosexual community and having unprotected sex in the gay/bi community. That's like saying you can get robbed in Greenwhich, Connecticut as well as Hartford, Connecticut. Well yeah, but the risks simply aren't the same for those who are not cautious.



  4. #24
    Senior Member Silver Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    东安格利亚切姆斯福德
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by wiltthestilt View Post
    That's true, but your risk within certain groups is dramatically greater than with others. That is obvious. If you always use a condom it shouldn't matter. But there is a sea of difference between having unprotected sex in the heterosexual community and having unprotected sex in the gay/bi community. That's like saying you can get robbed in Greenwhich, Connecticut as well as Hartford, Connecticut. Well yeah, but the risks simply aren't the same for those who are not cautious.
    If u use condom its no risk for anyone...but we cant say hetero gets less and other genders gets more..its unfair in percentage and i dont agreed with lies...they always make hetero to look good and the other gender/sexual identity look bad.lets wash our hands and blaime others,very easy to say.



  5. #25
    Senior Member Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    303

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by tsadriana View Post
    If u use condom its no risk for anyone...but we cant say hetero gets less and other genders gets more..its unfair in percentage and i dont agreed with lies...they always make hetero to look good and the other gender/sexual identity look bad.lets wash our hands and blaime others,very easy to say.
    Look, I hear where you're coming from. On bright bright side, MSM sex doesn't result in unintended pregnancies, which in the U.S. is an even bigger problem. You can destroy yourself financially by having a few kids you can't afford.

    I do think for anyone who has anal sex, AIDS is a much greater threat than for the population overall. It would be a great if everyone used condoms, but everyone doesn't, hence why the disease continues to spread.

    Anyway, my point wasn't to single anyone out, but to show that the OP's statistics shouldn't be startling or surprising to anyone here.



  6. #26
    Senior Member Silver Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    东安格利亚切姆斯福德
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by wiltthestilt View Post
    Look, I hear where you're coming from. On bright bright side, MSM sex doesn't result in unintended pregnancies, which in the U.S. is an even bigger problem. You can destroy yourself financially by having a few kids you can't afford.

    I do think for anyone who has anal sex, AIDS is a much greater threat than for the population overall. It would be a great if everyone used condoms, but everyone doesn't, hence why the disease continues to spread.

    Anyway, my point wasn't to single anyone out, but to show that the OP's statistics shouldn't be startling or surprising to anyone here.
    If i have a bf its for sure condom its out of option as 2 partners need to trust with each other .



  7. #27
    Silver Poster fred41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Queens, N.Y.
    Posts
    3,899

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by tsadriana View Post
    If i have a bf its for sure condom its out of option as 2 partners need to trust with each other .
    Unfortunately, it's usually an 'unequal' trust though, because the receptive partner in most relationships always faces the greater risk.



  8. #28
    Senior Member Silver Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    东安格利亚切姆斯福德
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by fred41 View Post
    Unfortunately, it's usually an 'unequal' trust though, because the receptive partner in most relationships always faces the greater risk.
    Lets get all ill from some stuppid percentage.i dont belleve in that shit.never will.if u do ur choice.



  9. #29
    till we fucking overdose Gold Poster amberskyi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,240

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by wiltthestilt View Post
    That's true, but your risk within certain groups is dramatically greater than with others. That is obvious. If you always use a condom it shouldn't matter. But there is a sea of difference between having unprotected sex in the heterosexual community and having unprotected sex in the gay/bi community. That's like saying you can get robbed in Greenwhich, Connecticut as well as Hartford, Connecticut. Well yeah, but the risks simply aren't the same for those who are not cautious.
    Say that to the heterosexual population in Africa which was experiencing an hiv epidemic less than a decade ago.
    The person being penetrated is always more at risk than the "penetrater"...that includes those who get poked in their vagina hunny



  10. #30
    Senior Member Silver Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    东安格利亚切姆斯福德
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: WOW!! WOW..if this indeed is true

    Quote Originally Posted by fred41 View Post
    Unfortunately, it's usually an 'unequal' trust though, because the receptive partner in most relationships always faces the greater risk.
    You know what that shit percentage tells me?fuck all women with no condom cos ur safe ,but dont fuck transwomen cos u get HIV what alot of rubbish



Similar Threads

  1. Hazel Turker Boob Job- It's True It's True!
    By TSPornFan in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 09-23-2012, 10:07 PM
  2. It's true
    By FreddieGomez in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-11-2012, 11:38 PM
  3. Does anyone know if this is true?
    By tsntx in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-05-2007, 08:56 AM
  4. IS THIS TRUE?
    By wombat33 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 04-30-2007, 04:21 AM
  5. is it true
    By bm4blt in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-19-2006, 08:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •