Your thoughts on image size?

[GroobySteven]

We're currently showing 800x600 on the web with downloadable zips of the images in 1024x768. We've a lot of mixed thought on what people would prefer as their browsable choice.
Bear in mind that these images are being seen from within the Hung Angels shell so click on the links beneath them for how they'd be seen on the websites.

I'd love some feedback - I'll pick 3 randomn answers by this time tomorrow and throw them a month on one of the sites of their choice.

Thanks
seanchai

[GroobySteven]

More... what size do you like?

[J_Rotten]

Bigger is better! As long as a larger image is actaully higher quality, which is probably the case for you since you are woking with higher res originals. For myself, I have all the bandwidth in the world and run a 1600x1200 moniter res. The view program I use resizes everything to max screensize, so a 400x300 jpg will come out the same size as a 2400x1800. Given that, a higher quality image looks so much better. I used to scan high quality ts porn into photoshop and the detail on some of those, before I reduced to them to jpg's suitable for newsgroup posting at the time, was amazing. I have seen some big mainstream porn sites offer zips of set in 2 or 3 resolutions. In that case, the highest res is the one I want.

JM

[slikrickdalicka]

WHERE CAN I CONTACT THIS BEAUTY...WOWOW SHE IS MAKING MY MOUTH WATER

[YasminLee]

thanks slik./...really sweet of u hun...as for the size..i don't think it matters much...

[BeardedOne]

thanks slik./...really sweet of u hun...as for the size..i don't think it matters much...

I was gonna say...

As for me, I like the big ones.

Oh, and the pix too.

[NickTheQuick]

1024x768 looks pretty damn good. But it's not like the smaller one would put me off. As long as you continue to use quality photographers that have good equipment I'll be satisfied. Then again Yasmin helps.

[larpe71]

I vote for the bigger size of pictures. Larger is better.

[Lobo]

I don't like the bigger pics.
The first pic you posted fits my screen perfectly (18 inch monitor). The second larger pic of the same image doesn't fit my screen all that well, by that I mean I can't see the girls face and entire cock at the same time, I have to scroll up or down to look at one or the other. That second big pic might as well be two separate pics, one of her face and one of her cock, because I can't see it all at the same time. I can see her eyes and the tip of her cock together, no more than that. That's something that upsets me if I'm paying a membership fee.
The larger pics are fine as long as the girl is lying down and the majority of the image is horizontal, but when a girl is standing up or vertical, the big pics just aren't practical and can be annoying and frustrating to view.
I know that you probably get different answers from different people all depending on personal taste.
I think maybe the best way to go about it is offer pictures that have a vertical image (girl standing up or lying down in a vertical position) is to offer those pics in two different sizes, one large and one smaller.
The only pic that bothers me is the second one, just can't fit it on my screen. Most people have monitors that are under 20 inches.
I like all the grooby sites, but I decided to become a member on a less frequent basis exactly because of this problem. Too may pictures that I have to skip over because of the size vertically, they are too big to properly view.
Most of these bigs pics may as well be close ups of a face or a cock, when you can't fit the whole picture on your screen, that's pretty much what these larger pictures are. I've got no use for them.

[Ecstatic]

Great question, seanchai. Answer: Yasmin is the perfect size for me....

oh, wait, you mean picture size. Seriously, I've thought a lot about this too. I've been trying a compromise size: 860x645. Bumps it up from 800x600 but leaves the image entirely or mostly visible on lower res monitors (to a point, of course). Here's an example.