Would you be seen in Public with a Chaser?!

[wiltthestilt]

your definitions kinda suck. the definition of chaser is broad, but not really incorrect. the non-chaser definition is far too finite.

a chaser is simply a person that pursues a transwoman solely because of physical attraction to the fact that she is a transwoman. if a man pursues a transwoman for who she is, not what she is, he is not a chaser.

And your reply kind of sucks. Taken to its logical conclusion, anyone who pursues trannies generally whether for sex or for a relationship could be considered a chaser under the descriptions offered on this thread (not mine).

[RallyCola]

And your reply kind of sucks. Taken to its logical conclusion, anyone who pursues trannies generally whether for sex or for a relationship could be considered a chaser under the descriptions offered on this thread (not mine).

no...because your idea of a non-chaser is, as your said, theoretical AND more importantly highly biased. why should a man not enjoy his woman and completely neglect her penis (unless of course she asks him too)

this thread has many erroneous definitions, of which your definition is one of them...it is just the one i saw first when i opened last page of the thread.

my definition is probably the most encompassing and accurate because a chaser is just a horn guy out for sex. if you pursue a ggirl because you are horny and want to fuck her, you are a vagina chaser too...but that's more socially acceptable so we don't attach the artificial negative connotation of "chaser" to it. by calling someone a "tranny chaser" most people inherently are passing judgement negatively on it when in fact, there is nothing wrong with being a horny guy and wanting to fuck the person that will get him off.

in my life, i have dated far more women than i have fucked but i have fucked far more women than i have been in a relationship with. as such, whether i was chasing ggirl vag or tranny dick is irrelevant because i fucked many women i never had any intention of dating or having an emotional involvement with.

[wiltthestilt]

no...because your idea of a non-chaser is, as your said, theoretical AND more importantly highly biased. why should a man not enjoy his woman and completely neglect her penis (unless of course she asks him too)

this thread has many erroneous definitions, of which your definition is one of them...it is just the one i saw first when i opened last page of the thread.

my definition is probably the most encompassing and accurate because a chaser is just a horn guy out for sex. if you pursue a ggirl because you are horny and want to fuck her, you are a vagina chaser too...but that's more socially acceptable so we don't attach the artificial negative connotation of "chaser" to it. by calling someone a "tranny chaser" most people inherently are passing judgement negatively on it when in fact, there is nothing wrong with being a horny guy and wanting to fuck the person that will get him off.

in my life, i have dated far more women than i have fucked but i have fucked far more women than i have been in a relationship with. as such, whether i was chasing ggirl vag or tranny dick is irrelevant because i fucked many women i never had any intention of dating or having an emotional involvement with.

My definitions were meant to be satirical. Maybe that didnt get across. The best definition of a chaser would be someone motivated solely by sex. But I have seen insinuations that the chaser is also secretly gay and that even men who are attacted to TS's could be considered chasers or gay which I find stupid.

Sexual attraction (the desire to have sex) is a part of nearly every relationship. And its also true that what you are is (a part of) who you are. Even if your height or education or race or manner of speaking may not be something you are fixated on it is something other people will be attracted to or repulsed by. For example, I know White men who date primarily black women; (educated) women who date mainly blue collar men; (average height) women who date primarily tall men. And even if they dont go looking for these people, thats who they often end up with. Which is why I think trying to parse between "straight" men who are genitalia indifferent and men who may be particularly attracted to TS's is stupid. Instead what should be important is what kind of partner that person will make rather than what his ostensible preferences are.

[RallyCola]

My definitions were meant to be satirical. Maybe that didnt get across. The best definition of a chaser would be someone motivated solely by sex. But I have seen insinuations that the chaser is also secretly gay and that even men who are attacted to TS's could be considered chasers or gay which I find stupid.

Sexual attraction (the desire to have sex) is a part of nearly every relationship. And its also true that what you are is (a part of) who you are. Even if your height or education or race or manner of speaking may not be something you are fixated on it is something other people will be attracted to or repulsed by. For example, I know White men who date primarily black women; (educated) women who date mainly blue collar men; (average height) women who date primarily tall men. And even if they dont go looking for these people, thats who they often end up with. Which is why I think trying to parse between "straight" men who are genitalia indifferent and men who may be particularly attracted to TS's is stupid. Instead what should be important is what kind of partner that person will make rather than what his ostensible preferences are.

no...i got that which is why i lead my post with your definitions "kinda suck"

had i believed you were stating a definite opinion that you would stand behind 100%, i'd have been more aggressive and dismissive at the same time.

you are right that the difference is clearly intent...only sex with anyone that will do vs valuing the person. its all good. no need to get your panties in a bunch like someone else is doing in 2 other threads i'm prodding him in

[Bunsdk]

Well, considering the vagueness and accusations of the OP on what chaser is and what they are.

Dont date gay men, darling.

But if you class most of the ppl who like you for who you are, instead of who you wanna be, as gay in a negatory way, then the problem is most likely not them.

Personally I couldnt care less if you had a dick or not, but if you scuff at me and call me gay like that, because I would be willing to give you the same pleasure I derive from sex... You could be very sure of two things.
I wouldnt be seen in public with you, or see you at all again.
And you probably would find yourself in a lot of trouble with actually getting into a stabile healthy relationship.

Dont project your hate of yourself unto others.
Its just like listening to an insecure teenager.
OMG dont look at my tits, they are weird.
Dont touch my ass, its so saggy.

Grow up.

[BellaBellucci]

If someone who cares more about penis than people constitutes being a "chaser", then many girls (including transgendered) are chasers themselves.

By your own definition:
A guy is at a club having a good time. A girl catches his attention, he decides to go up and TALK to her. She thinks he's attractive and she wants some cock now, and immediately grabs at his crotch. That's as chaser as it gets by your own definition.

She cares more about the penis than the person. She , by default, skipped what he had to say and penis was the order of the day.

They're called horny one night stands no strings attached (meaning not being seen in public with them). I'm not saying it's right, but people(men and women) do it all the time.

I've NEVER seen a woman do this. She won't chase a man simply because he has a dick or else she'd be chasing trans women too. A woman is normally looking for companionship that MAY include sex. Men, on the other hand, more often than, often think ONLY with their little head. There are exceptions of course, but overall, this comparison is a logical fallacy.

~BB~

[BellaBellucci]

But if you class most of the ppl who like you for who you are, instead of who you wanna be, as gay in a negatory way, then the problem is most likely not them.

Wow. Yet another self-serving interpretation of what I said. I'm shocked.

It's not about having a problem with guys being attracted to me for 'who I am versus who I want to be.' I am who I want to be. It's guys who ignore who I am because they want me to be something else (sex-crazed shemale top stereotype) that are the problem. I have a female sensibility about sex, not a male one, and you chasers and chaser apologists can take it or leave it. Desire my whole person or be gone. I have no use for you.

Get it straight. The denial, shame, and self-hated come from the other side of the fence. Period.

~BB~

[fivekatz]

Get it straight. The denial, shame, and self-hated come from the other side of the fence. Period.

~BB~

This OP seems to me to have been inspired by a different OP which asked the rather moronic question as to whether one would be seen in public with a TG.

Considering how much longer this thread has raged on and how much objection many have to the term tranny chaser, Bella may just have a point, though it probably could be expressed in slightly more gentle terms.

I think I mentioned earlier in this epic thread that men who are only interested in GGs and only in getting laid are often called pussy hounds.

Two things about that however, very few of these shallow fellows who just want to be bang em and leave em would ever ask if they would be seen in public with a GG and few would ever take exception to being called a pussy hound. In fact many just might wear that name as a macho badge of honor.

Food for thought guys. Bella may express a certain amount of anger in her post, but her take is not without some merit.

[Ecstatic]

You choose to drawn a line in this conversation.

There's no hostility only facts. And for the record "Porn" is Greek word for "whore" or "prostitute"....the "ography" part means "to photograph". (Google it!)

Dismissing it as "business" doesn't hide the fact you hate doing it on some level, so why act offended merely because I speak it's rightful name?

Now since that's bend addressed is your overall opinion par with the OP's or is there some room for rational thinking?

Not quite; you have the "porn" (actually porne) part right, but the suffix referred originally to writing, not photography, from graphein "to write." The word dates from 1857, meaning "description of prostitutes," is derived from the French pornographie, which in turn derives from the Greek pornographos "(one) writing of prostitutes." Pornography was originally used to describe classical art and writing, but as photography appeared in the mid-1880s, and photographic depictions of sexual nature soon followed, the association with photography became established. Graphy itself refers to the process of writing or recording, and photo, meaning light, from the Greek photo-, comb. form of phos (genitive photos) "light," from the Proto-Indo-European root *bha- meaning "to shine" (also the root of phantasm), hence "recording with light."

[Ecstatic]

I've made it clear repeatedly that a chaser is someone who cares more about penis than people.

~BB~

Spot on!