Open you eyes to the Trafficking of Thais into London

[gslang]

It come up on different threads, but deserves its own discussion.

recently: http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=74044

previously:
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=70121
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=66529

Are YOU supporting trafficking?

Either actively, from advertising here, writing as an agent, or posing as reviewer. All against current UK laws.

Or by closing your eyes to the obvious.
Such as when visiting or writing about the girls as tho the issue doesn't exist.

Thai girls are shipped to central london and held here under debt-bondage.

Not chained to walls, but having been lured under promises of riches to be made, are then subject to a huge debt for the arranging of travel, fake documentation, accommodation, photo/advert packaging, working premises/protection plus debt interest. And thats before they feed themselves, and whatever habit they have.

One day this will come out, and like the current appalling Saville revelations, we wonder why WE let it go on for so long.

its time to speak up. being silent is siding with the perpetrators.

i welcome a considered debate (oh dear, thats wishing)

[tsadriana]

To be honest i never had a clue abouut this thai girls being used as sex toy for pimps in london...I will be very shocked if this will came out as being true.

[tsadriana]

I think the guys who opt for this sopposed angecys to be worried,because if what u said will be true i dont think it will end quite good.

[Jericho]

Never favored agencies
Always gone for the independents!

[Jericho]

Unless I'm in Bkk, then it's Casanovas!

[Prospero]

It's a reason I have always instinctively avoided agencies

[Stavros]

It come up on different threads, but deserves its own discussion.

recently: http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=74044

previously:
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=70121
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=66529

Are YOU supporting trafficking?

Either actively, from advertising here, writing as an agent, or posing as reviewer. All against current UK laws.

Or by closing your eyes to the obvious.
Such as when visiting or writing about the girls as tho the issue doesn't exist.

Thai girls are shipped to central london and held here under debt-bondage.

Not chained to walls, but having been lured under promises of riches to be made, are then subject to a huge debt for the arranging of travel, fake documentation, accommodation, photo/advert packaging, working premises/protection plus debt interest. And thats before they feed themselves, and whatever habit they have.

One day this will come out, and like the current appalling Saville revelations, we wonder why WE let it go on for so long.

its time to speak up. being silent is siding with the perpetrators.

i welcome a considered debate (oh dear, thats wishing)

I don't use escorts any more, and when I did never used an agency, and I do not condone or excuse any form of trafficking; but if this concerns you to the degree that it appears to, can I assume that you are going to present your evidence to the Metropolitan Police in order to have this 'trafficking' stopped?

[gslang]

im glad u asked that. ive asked myself the same question, how far should one speakup?

theres a concern how far reaching the consequences will be.

99.99% of those escorting are breaking the law to some degree, including tax avoidance.

would u want some plod going methodically thru Eros, Birchplace?
the knock on effect could b wide ranging. and those we consider innocent, honest could be detrimentally effected.

i was hoping that perhaps greater awareness or open discussion would lead to some self-policing, as people involved.. potential clients, advertisers make more informed decisions and reject any involvement in this business.

At least its a start. Rather than the moral panicking being used as an excuse to clamp down on any type of sex work, at least we can vote with our feet (or how many inches).

[rodinuk]

99.99% of those escorting are breaking the law to some degree, including tax avoidance.

Kudos for starting the thread but you have to remain objective in your argument - I do not buy the allegation that only 1 in 10000 escorts are legal. I don't buy figures emanating from the porthole of Dennis Mcshane (how are the mighty fallen!) and his ilk either who like to spin urban mythical statistics in pursuit of their goal of criminalising payforplay outright.

The taxation issue was discussed on another thread:
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=61829

The change in the law to strict liability for procuring a trafficked escort is also worth repeating:

Obviously even a single trafficked person is a problem, however the aforementioned politicians like to quote (unsubstantiated) figures in the tens of thousands in order to seek the adoption of the Swedish model whereby punters who seek payforplay are criminalised.

To say that the problem only exists in the news is totally naive. The recent change in the law makes it illegal for the client if he procures a provider for sex and that provider turns out to be trafficked and then he can be arrested and fined up to £1000 and gain a criminal record. Even the act of procurement is enough even if you were unaware that they were trafficked. This is one of only two laws on the statute book where strict liability applies (makes a person legally responsible for the damage and loss caused by his or her acts and omissions regardless of whether they were actually to blame).

[FreddieGomez]

most tranny chasers are all for trafficking though.