BREAKING NEWS! serial killer RESPONSIBLE AND NOT O.J. SIMPSON

[natina]

AmyDaly I missed you!
I had been thinking about you ,knowing that you are one of the 47% that mitt romney was talking about.

hey you are gaining a little fullness in the face.I hope you are ok.

we gotta talk. nice of you to admit there was some racism in the O.J. TRIAL AND with the DETECTIVES GATHERING THE EVIDENCE.


DID any porn lately? I wanna see you and Darryl fuck/boink. that would be exciting.

Just because there was some "racism" involved doesn't make him any less guilty.

OJ is selling the knife used to kill them, by the way.

[Stavros]

Some random thoughts on it for what they are worth:

1) Because we have so many US cop shows on tv that in recent years have either had a fetish for procedure or the tensions between procedure and gut feeling, it seems the inability of the LAPD to handle a crime scene like they do on TV is seen as a weakness, whereas I get the impression that in real life crime scene procedures are not handled well at all -as is often the case with death row prisoners where there are doubts about the evidence collected at the time of the murder(s). Its not any better in the UK either.

2) A lot of the evidence gathered at the crime scene and in statements collected by the police is not presented in court -full disclosure may never taken place, which means this new allegation may not be new at all, but was just not presented in court. In the UK this has been at the heart of miscarriages of justice where the police have deliberately withheld such information in order to present credible evidence in court and obtain a convinction, most notoriously in the case of the 'Birmingham Six' accused of being members of the Provisional IRA responsible for blowing up a pub in Birmingham. They were in prison for 16 years until the convinctions were declared unsafe and they were released.

3) One of the jurors explicitly stated that Cochrane convinced them the trial was not about the murder but about 'race' (whatever that is) which to me is in itself a perversion of the whole purpose of the trial. Cochrane's summation, using the phrase 'genocidal racism' was sophistry designed to divert the minds of the jury from the facts in the case, which was about the murder of two people and had nothing to do with 'race' (whatever that is).

4) If OJ Simpson was not involved in the incident, what was that farce of him trying to makea getaway in a white van on the freeway all about?

5) What was in the bag that OJ had with him on the night of the murder, that his lawyer managed to disappear?

6) When someone accused of murder refuses to testify in his own defence, I think they undermine their own case.

7) The trial failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that OJ was responsible, that to me is what matters most, even if he did it.

eight) Spare a thought for those on death row -and those executed, notably in Texas- who are innocent but did not have the luxury of slick lawyers to convince a jury to release them.

9) Where is OJ Simpson now? What, if anything, did he win?