Results 21 to 30 of 34
-
10-15-2012 #21
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 1,623
Re: Is The Bible Still Relevant Today?
That's meant to be 'source of authority' - but I assume everyone still understood what I was saying.
Yeah, I'm more interested in all the facets and the implications of various stances in this debate than simply a yes/no response.
But you are right that the question is about the bible's general relevance.
-
10-15-2012 #22
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 13,574
Re: Is The Bible Still Relevant Today?
Some interesting ideas floating around -there was a time when literacy was power, when the Church did not want biblical texts translated in case ordinary people could read them; the early translator of parts of the Vulgate into English, John Wycliffe, an early anti-Catholoic, died in 1384 -in 1428 his remains were exhumed on the orders of Pope Martin the Fifth, burned and the ashes scattered in the river. In order to learn Hebrew and thus translate books of the Bible in that language, William Tyndale had to travel to Germany where there were Jewish communties, as Jews had been expelled from England at the time. Another anti-Catholic, he was arrested in a town outside Brussels in 1535, and a year later strangled to death and his body burnt at the stake. Ok so they were considered heretics opposed to the Church, but the attempts by both Wycliffe and Tyndale to make the sacred texts available to all were deemed to undermine the authority of the Church of Rome -which was part of their intention.
Abraham and Isaac, along with Cain and Abel are two accounts of sacrifice which I think is one of the most complex subjects. In Violence and the Sacred, Rene Girard argues that Cain killed Abel because he was a farmer with no animals to sacrifice whereas Abel as a pastoralist had sheep or goats: the issue of rage, or anger expressing itself in violence thus suggests Cain had no other outlet for a ritual display of anger, motivated by jealousy -so he killed his brother. Isaac is spared because the option of killing a ram instead of a human is preferred -thus these narratives could mark a moment in human society when human sacrifice came to an end: this makes the crucifixion even more compelling, as Jesus is possibly arguing that all violence against the person should end, and he will offer himself as the last sacrifice -the belief being that after him, people will learn to love, and not to kill.
But I agree with Trish that many of the biblical stories are not that compelling; but I can't understand why people assume the Middle East is desert -the snow-capped mountains of Lebanon, the olive groves and plum trees of Palestine, the rolling wheat fields of central Jordan, the verdant valleys of the Tigris and the Euphrates....there is so much more to the place than camels, sand dunes, and hairy men with apocalytpic messages...
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
10-15-2012 #23
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- www.libertyharkness.com
- Posts
- 9,321
Re: Is The Bible Still Relevant Today?
no its not relevant imo
1 out of 1 members liked this post.Liberty Harkness
"English Transsexual Model - Entertainer - Photographer "
Twitter
Official Website
Tumblr
My Webcam
-
10-15-2012 #24
-
10-15-2012 #25
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 1,083
Re: Is The Bible Still Relevant Today?
I wish Richard Dawkins would just fuck off!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 out of 2 members liked this post.
-
10-15-2012 #26
-
10-15-2012 #27
Re: Is The Bible Still Relevant Today?
Dawkins is actually a hugely nice guy - just a bit fixated.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
10-15-2012 #28
Re: Is The Bible Still Relevant Today?
Avatar is not representative of the available product - contents may differ
-
10-15-2012 #29
-
10-16-2012 #30
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 4,709
Re: Is The Bible Still Relevant Today?
I agree with that and he's a great scientist though I've only read the first three chapters of the Blind Watchmaker. Although I am an atheist myself I always felt he was wasting a great deal of time on the lecture circuit talking about how he thinks there isn't a God. I mean he could have gotten his point across about the damage he thinks intelligent design and creationism have done to science generally, and that he thinks evolution explains the humble origins of mankind and then gotten back to his very important work. It's not that there aren't important issues ancillary to theism and atheism, it's just that a great scientist is wasting a good deal of his precious time proselytizing his non-belief.
Again, I say this as an atheist that I actually think the idea of non-belief is not that interesting or stimulating. It's worth a discussion or two but since it's non-belief, even my own non-belief, I don't think it is a way of life, a philosophy or a culture. I still hold to it though
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
Similar Threads
-
Bible Too Liberal? Conservatives Say Yes
By Silcc69 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 10-07-2009, 07:03 PM -
The Bible is...
By Rogers in forum Politics and ReligionReplies: 44Last Post: 07-04-2007, 11:27 PM -
Transgenderism and the Bible
By LG in forum Politics and ReligionReplies: 20Last Post: 07-04-2007, 07:09 AM -
Take Your Hand Off the Bible
By chefmike in forum Politics and ReligionReplies: 2Last Post: 02-13-2007, 02:54 AM -
Funny, and relevant to some porn shooters
By alfredog in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 10-03-2005, 03:50 PM