Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member Rookie Poster Marts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    44

    Wink Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof

    The mere anticipation of an interaction with a woman can impair men's cognitive performance



    Abstract

    Recent research suggests that heterosexual men's (but not heterosexual women's) cognitive performance is impaired after an interaction with someone of the opposite sex (Karremans et al., 2009). These findings have been interpreted in terms of the cognitive costs of trying to make a good impression during the interaction. In everyday life, people frequently engage in pseudo-interactions with women (e.g., through the phone or the internet) or anticipate interacting with a woman later on. The goal of the present research was to investigate if men's cognitive performance decreased in these types of situations, in which men have little to no opportunity to impress her and, moreover, have little to no information about the mate value of their interaction partner. Two studies demonstrated that men's (but not women's) cognitive performance declined if they were led to believe that they interacted with a woman via a computer (Study 1) or even if they merely anticipated an interaction with a woman (Study 2). Together, these results suggest that an actual interaction is not a necessary prerequisite for the cognitive impairment effect to occur. Moreover, these effects occur even if men do not get information about the woman's attractiveness. This latter finding is discussed in terms of error management theory.


    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22042159





  2. #2
    Silver Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,113

    Default Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof

    interesting- i wonder what the results would be with transsexuals



  3. #3
    Platinum Poster natina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    hollywood,calif
    Posts
    7,071

    Default Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof

    I new it

    WOMEN ARE EVIL TO



    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	evilgirls.jpg 
Views:	248 
Size:	18.0 KB 
ID:	506510  


    Last edited by natina; 09-20-2012 at 10:35 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Professional Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,306

    Default Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof

    This aint nothing new.....lol



  5. #5
    Platinum Poster natina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    hollywood,calif
    Posts
    7,071

    Default Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof

    The mere anticipation of an interaction with a woman can impair men's cognitive performance.

    Nauts S, Metzmacher M, Verwijmeren T, Rommeswinkel V, Karremans JC.
    Source

    Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. s.nauts@psych.ru.nl

    Abstract

    Recent research suggests that heterosexual men's (but not heterosexual women's) cognitive performance is impaired after an interaction with someone of the opposite sex (Karremans et al., 2009). These findings have been interpreted in terms of the cognitive costs of trying to make a good impression during the interaction. In everyday life, people frequently engage in pseudo-interactions with women (e.g., through the phone or the internet) or anticipate interacting with a woman later on. The goal of the present research was to investigate if men's cognitive performance decreased in these types of situations, in which men have little to no opportunity to impress her and, moreover, have little to no information about the mate value of their interaction partner. Two studies demonstrated that men's (but not women's) cognitive performance declined if they were led to believe that they interacted with a woman via a computer (Study 1) or even if they merely anticipated an interaction with a woman (Study 2). Together, these results suggest that an actual interaction is not a necessary prerequisite for the cognitive impairment effect to occur. Moreover, these effects occur even if men do not get information about the woman's attractiveness. This latter finding is discussed in terms of error management theory.

    Comment in


    PMID:22042159[PubMed - in process] PMCID:PMC3394231Free PMC Article



  6. #6
    Marjorie Taylor Greene Is A Nice Lady Platinum Poster Dino Velvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    23,141

    Default Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof

    They're dangerous when you try to give them 4 20s instead of 5.



  7. #7
    Senior Member Professional Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,306

    Default Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof

    This Roy Masters guy is my fucking hero!!!



Similar Threads

  1. More proof on how dangerous escorting is
    By slinky in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-23-2008, 03:45 AM
  2. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-12-2007, 04:54 PM
  3. New Scientific Evidence: Did Oswald Act Alone?
    By chefmike in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 05-20-2007, 08:01 AM
  4. What are the scientific reasons for having sex?(Reg.U.K.)
    By White_Male_Canada in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-11-2006, 06:27 AM
  5. F2M transexual action- A more scientific poll
    By LG in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-16-2005, 08:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •