Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
09-20-2012 #1
Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof
The mere anticipation of an interaction with a woman can impair men's cognitive performance
Abstract
Recent research suggests that heterosexual men's (but not heterosexual women's) cognitive performance is impaired after an interaction with someone of the opposite sex (Karremans et al., 2009). These findings have been interpreted in terms of the cognitive costs of trying to make a good impression during the interaction. In everyday life, people frequently engage in pseudo-interactions with women (e.g., through the phone or the internet) or anticipate interacting with a woman later on. The goal of the present research was to investigate if men's cognitive performance decreased in these types of situations, in which men have little to no opportunity to impress her and, moreover, have little to no information about the mate value of their interaction partner. Two studies demonstrated that men's (but not women's) cognitive performance declined if they were led to believe that they interacted with a woman via a computer (Study 1) or even if they merely anticipated an interaction with a woman (Study 2). Together, these results suggest that an actual interaction is not a necessary prerequisite for the cognitive impairment effect to occur. Moreover, these effects occur even if men do not get information about the woman's attractiveness. This latter finding is discussed in terms of error management theory.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22042159
-
09-20-2012 #2
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 3,113
Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof
interesting- i wonder what the results would be with transsexuals
-
09-20-2012 #3
Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof
I new it
WOMEN ARE EVIL TO
Last edited by natina; 09-20-2012 at 10:35 PM.
-
09-20-2012 #4
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 1,306
Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof
This aint nothing new.....lol
-
09-20-2012 #5
Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof
The mere anticipation of an interaction with a woman can impair men's cognitive performance.
Nauts S, Metzmacher M, Verwijmeren T, Rommeswinkel V, Karremans JC.
Source
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. s.nauts@psych.ru.nl
Abstract
Recent research suggests that heterosexual men's (but not heterosexual women's) cognitive performance is impaired after an interaction with someone of the opposite sex (Karremans et al., 2009). These findings have been interpreted in terms of the cognitive costs of trying to make a good impression during the interaction. In everyday life, people frequently engage in pseudo-interactions with women (e.g., through the phone or the internet) or anticipate interacting with a woman later on. The goal of the present research was to investigate if men's cognitive performance decreased in these types of situations, in which men have little to no opportunity to impress her and, moreover, have little to no information about the mate value of their interaction partner. Two studies demonstrated that men's (but not women's) cognitive performance declined if they were led to believe that they interacted with a woman via a computer (Study 1) or even if they merely anticipated an interaction with a woman (Study 2). Together, these results suggest that an actual interaction is not a necessary prerequisite for the cognitive impairment effect to occur. Moreover, these effects occur even if men do not get information about the woman's attractiveness. This latter finding is discussed in terms of error management theory.
Comment in
- What is anticipation and what is not? Comment on Nauts, Metzmacher, Verwijmeren, Rommeswinkel, and Karremans (2011). [Arch Sex Behav. 2012]What is anticipation and what is not? Comment on Nauts, Metzmacher, Verwijmeren, Rommeswinkel, and Karremans (2011).Nadin M. Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Aug; 41(4):753; author reply 755-6.
PMID:22042159[PubMed - in process] PMCID:PMC3394231Free PMC Article
-
09-20-2012 #6
Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof
They're dangerous when you try to give them 4 20s instead of 5.
-
09-20-2012 #7
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 1,306
Re: Women are Dangerous - Scientific Proof
This Roy Masters guy is my fucking hero!!!
Similar Threads
-
More proof on how dangerous escorting is
By slinky in forum General DiscussionReplies: 8Last Post: 02-23-2008, 03:45 AM -
Debunking the skeptics- A scientific guide to climate change
By LG in forum Politics and ReligionReplies: 16Last Post: 07-12-2007, 04:54 PM -
New Scientific Evidence: Did Oswald Act Alone?
By chefmike in forum General DiscussionReplies: 36Last Post: 05-20-2007, 08:01 AM -
What are the scientific reasons for having sex?(Reg.U.K.)
By White_Male_Canada in forum General DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 10-11-2006, 06:27 AM -
F2M transexual action- A more scientific poll
By LG in forum General DiscussionReplies: 5Last Post: 02-16-2005, 08:38 PM