Please ban Jamie Michelle

[The American Nightmare]

That guy's a fucking retard.

[Jamie Michelle]

That guy's a fucking retard.

There is no need for you to project upon me your own condition, other than your need to attempt to reduce me to your own pathetic level.

[ezed]

That guy's a fucking retard.

There is no need for you to project upon me your own condition, other than your need to attempt to reduce me to your own pathetic level.

Did you post this two minutes after my post on the other thread. I'm relying on the honor system.

THE AMERICAN NIGHTMARE- two minutes for assaulting a player in the penalty box.

[fishman33]

That guy's a fucking retard.

LOL

While I do agree that he is a fucking retard, I'm not a fan of censorship in any form. I guess wasting all that bandwidth with 5,000 words of non-sense in every post is a banable offense, but don't ban him just for stupidity- we all might find ourselves in trouble if that happens. How 'bout we compromise and remove the 'hot hung angel' monicker from his avatar. I think we can all agree on that.

While we're on the subject of banning, why was YourDaddy banned? I know that he often got into scrapes on here, but all he ever did that I saw was sit on the right side of the fence. I don't think his attacks were anymore severe than anything that was afflicted on him. Did I miss somethign major while I was away?

[tubgirl]

has anyone seen pics of jamie michelle?

[Jamie Michelle]

That guy's a fucking retard.

LOL

While I do agree that he is a fucking retard, I'm not a fan of censorship in any form. I guess wasting all that bandwidth with 5,000 words of non-sense in every post is a banable offense, but don't ban him just for stupidity- we all might find ourselves in trouble if that happens. How 'bout we compromise and remove the 'hot hung angel' . from his avatar. I think we can all agree on that.

While we're on the subject of banning, why was YourDaddy banned? I know that he often got into scrapes on here, but all he ever did that I saw was sit on the right side of the fence. I don't think his attacks were anymore severe than anything that was afflicted on him. Did I miss somethign major while I was away?

Actually, I am a literal genius, with an IQ of over 140. Rather, you simply dislike the truths that I speak so you project upon me your own condition in an attempt to reduce me to your pathetic level.

Below is some more truth to fuel your cognitive dissonance:

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopi...ibertyandtruth

[BeardedOne]

I'm just irked by redundant cut-n-paste posts that don't display any effort or original thought.

[BeardedOne]

I'm just irked by redundant cut-n-paste posts that don't display any effort or original thought.

[BeardedOne]

I'm just irked by redundant cut-n-paste posts that don't display any effort or original thought.

[Jamie Michelle]

I'm just irked by redundant cut-n-paste posts that don't display any effort or original thought.

Indeed it does fuel your cognitive dissonance.

Perhaps you would care to attempt to refute the below articles? Of course, you can't refute them, because they are true.

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopi...ibertyandtruth