The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything

[Jamie Michelle]

Below is an article that I recently wrote. It is published under my legal name. It concerns the Omega Point cosmology by physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler, which is a proof of God's existence based upon the most reserved view of the known laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics). For anyone who has ever wondered about such questions as what the meaning of life is, what the purpose of their own life is, whether there is life after death, whether God exists, what the future holds for humanity, and why anything exists at all as opposed to nothingness, then this article answers all of those questions using the known laws of physics.

This article further provides an examination of the globalist political power-elite: history is given on their organizational structure and their methods of accumulating power; and analysis is given on where they're attempting to take the world, i.e., their self-termed New World Order world government and world religion.

The article furnishes documentation on what the globalist oligarchy's ultimate goal is. This ultimate goal of theirs most popularly goes by the name of transhumanism: immortality through technology. However, I explain in the article that the coming radical life-extension technologies create a fundamental dilemma for the oligarchs, which is why they must dominate world society before such technology becomes a reality. The details of that dilemma are explained in Sec. 8.2.2: "The Mark of the Beast" of the article.

Thus, this article explains to people what is to occur and why it is to occur, so that they will not be in ignorance as to the events that are to unfold.

Below one can download the article for free. I encourage everyone to generously share this article with others. By all means, please save it to your hard-drive and give others copies of it. Also, feel free to share the text of this post. The article is in PDF format.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), January 20, 2012 (orig. pub. December 19, 2011), 185 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1974708 , http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708

Below is the abstract to my above article:

""
ABSTRACT: Analysis is given of the Omega Point cosmology, an extensively peer-reviewed proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) published in leading physics journals by professor of physics and mathematics Frank J. Tipler, which demonstrates that in order for the known laws of physics to be mutually consistent, the universe must diverge to infinite computational power as it collapses into a final cosmological singularity, termed the Omega Point. The theorem is an intrinsic component of the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) describing and unifying all the forces in physics, of which itself is also required by the known physical laws. With infinite computational resources, the dead can be resurrected--never to die again--via perfect computer emulation of the multiverse from its start at the Big Bang. Miracles are also physically allowed via electroweak quantum tunneling controlled by the Omega Point cosmological singularity. The Omega Point is a different aspect of the Big Bang cosmological singularity--the first cause--and the Omega Point has all the haecceities claimed for God in the traditional religions.

From this analysis, conclusions are drawn regarding the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the Omega Point cosmology.
""

Below are other places where this article can be downloaded:

Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
2,392,318 bytes
MD5: 33d94a4fda1dfdc6d0bc00ffdf7e4383

http://theophysics.chimehost.net/Red...ics-of-God.pdf
http://www.webcitation.org/64ttFsATE

http://theophysics.host56.com/Redfor...ics-of-God.pdf
http://www.webcitation.org/64ttxvzUr

http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/0...-God.pdf_links
http://www.mediafire.com/?i1mdwnac3486d19
http://www.badongo.com/file/26143838
http://www.fileserve.com/file/X8PXdFh

http://uploadmirrors.com/download/PV...ics-of-God.pdf
http://www.wupload.com/file/2650691527
http://extabit.com/file/2dut258dvj4tu
http://www38.zippyshare.com/v/84006266/file.html

http://www.crocko.com/74D2F3CED4FA44...ics-of-God.pdf
http://netload.in/datei1ihLqPr7DH.htm
http://www.2shared.com/document/BEk3...cs-of-God.html

Note that the above publication date, the total page count, the file byte size, and the MD5 checksum are subject to change with newer versions of the article, if I were to release such.

The URLs to my Theophysics websites should contain the latest version of the article. With the WebCite URLs ( http://www.webcitation.org ), one can look to see if there is a newer version of this article on the drop-down menu containing the date. Also look at the postings in this forum to see if I have published updated URLs to newer versions of this article, assuming I am unable to update this post.

[trish]

Congratulations, Jamie on your publication.

For those of you not familiar with the conversation I refer you to
http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=53278

[Stavros]

Jamie, on the one hand an impressive piece of writing, and it is an intellectually brave -or foolish- person who attempts to make a direct link between cosmology and politics; but on the other hand at 185 pages it is either a pamphlet or a small book, not an article. It would be easier to read if you condensed the core arguments into say 25 pages, but frankly your political ideas are based on a selective interpretation of documents and history, and are considered offensive by enough people to prohibit publication in the standard academic journals, but I guess you know that. Your processional view of human history and as a progressive sequence of enlightenment, is, quite simply, rubbish.

I can't comment much on the cosmology as I have no real understanding of it, so I have no idea how it relates to ongoing debates within cosmology, most of which I find incomprehensible anyway.

The problem with the politics is in part a matter of opinion, I don't share your explanations for events in history, and I feel that because your whole argument is integrated, if one part breaks down, it all breaks down. Here are some comments on some of your political arguments.

1) Your argument for a conspiracy to bring down the World Trade Center may be part of the 9/11 conspiracy theory but you never address any of the counter-arguments, or the incidents that took place outside New York City.

2) Your argument about the Second World War suffers from an inability to separate the issue of Germany and the domination of Europe as an historical problem dating from 1870, and your confused ideas about global politics -you seem to suggest that there is a globalising imperative in politics that has been around since the Pharoahs, as a conscious plan, but because of the way you frame an argument, this means that everything you cite to prove your theory, is right, because your theory says so!

3) You call the invasion of Poland in 1939 the key moment in European history, where others would cite the Re-Militarisation of the Rhineland in 1936, or for that matter the failure of German state to deal with Hitler after the Munich Putsch -he was still an Austrian citizen at the time and in theory and fact could have been deported after serving time in prison. The Rhineland issue is critical because without military cover France and Britain would have had easier access to the industrial Ruhr to disrupt any war Hitler planned as part of his vision -once re-militarised, Hitler had secured his western flank, and could focus on removing humans from the 'East' in preparation for his new Aryan civilisation to be populated by the sons of Germany.

4) If it is the case that the 'global oligarchy' benefits from wars, why are there now fewer wars historically than ever before with fewer casualties, as Steven Pinker has argued, undermining a substantial part of your thesis.

5) Who benefitted from the Iran-Iraq war -it bankrupted those two states and led directly to the invasion of Kuwait and the sanctions regime -you can argue that arms manufacturers and smugglers benefited, but given the recent history, it seems you would put Iran-Iraq, Kuwait and Gulf War II into a repetitive syndrome, a great con-game in which the 'masters of the universe' deliberately engage in wars to eliminate useless humans and make a lot of money, and I don't accept that.

6) At one point you argue that 'Jewish banking families' are part of the One World Order Conspiracy (to put Lucifer on the throne of the world), yet a Jew and scion of the banking family Lord Edwin Montagu was aggressively opposed to precisely the same Balfour Declaration (and indeed a Jewish state of any description) which you claim was part of this deal. You cannot get away with saying at one and the same time 'Jewish bankers' were part of the plan and not part of the plan. You also don't deal with the fact that the Balfour Declaration and indeed the League of Nations mandates were not supported by the people who lived in the Middle East but I guess the views of ordinary people are never part of your argument, as popular opinon indeed, people are irrelevant in your scheme of things, your focus is exclusively on the oligarchs. Yet, if 'we' are just little people, why were there so many insurrections against French rule in Syria, and the bitter insurrection against the British in Mesopotamia/Iraq in 1920? None of this figures in your argument, because it doesn't fit with your theory -people are opposed to imperialism, colonialism, racism, wars, and so on, but they are not necessarily guided by Christianity, which for you is the core propulsion of resistance to Lucifer, L Ron Hubbard, Aleister Crowley, George W. Bush et al.

7) One small point: Britain was 'awarded' the mandate over Palestine at the San Remo Conference in 1920 and sent Herbert Samuel to Jerusalem as its first High Commissioner later that year, not in 1922. You imply that Chatham House is no longer the Royal Institute for International Affairs, but that, legally, is still its name; Chatham House is just a re-branding exercise. There are other factual errors I spotted in the paper but I have not read it thoroughly.

Finally: Walid (sometimes Wallace) Fard (pronouced Far'ud), the author of Yacub's Book and creator of the Lost-Found Nation of Islam, was, according to Elijah Mohammed, God made flesh -Fard founded the 'Nation' in 1930 and 'disappeared' in 1934. It means that we have photographs of Almighty God which you have not cited; ok so its not the Turin Shroud, and it may be a disappointment to some that God looks like a shifty Arab from Detroit, but if you believe there is a God then you need to explain why you don't believe Fard was God, but there is no discussion of the 'Nation' and its 'Mother Plane', or indeed of mainstream Islam in your paper.

[giovanni_hotel]

Interesting.

Appreciate the pdf.

[Jamie Michelle]

Jamie, on the one hand an impressive piece of writing, and it is an intellectually brave -or foolish- person who attempts to make a direct link between cosmology and politics; but on the other hand at 185 pages it is either a pamphlet or a small book, not an article. It would be easier to read if you condensed the core arguments into say 25 pages, but frankly your political ideas are based on a selective interpretation of documents and history, and are considered offensive by enough people to prohibit publication in the standard academic journals, but I guess you know that. Your processional view of human history and as a progressive sequence of enlightenment, is, quite simply, rubbish.

I can't comment much on the cosmology as I have no real understanding of it, so I have no idea how it relates to ongoing debates within cosmology, most of which I find incomprehensible anyway.

The problem with the politics is in part a matter of opinion, I don't share your explanations for events in history, and I feel that because your whole argument is integrated, if one part breaks down, it all breaks down. Here are some comments on some of your political arguments.

1) Your argument for a conspiracy to bring down the World Trade Center may be part of the 9/11 conspiracy theory but you never address any of the counter-arguments, or the incidents that took place outside New York City.

The 9/11 attacks are a conspiracy since more than one person was involved in bringing them about. So any theory regarding the 9/11 attacks is by definiton a conspiracy theory, unless one were to maintain that only one person was involved in carrying them out. It's just that the US government's official conspiracy theory is a mendacious, self-serving, anti-historical, antiphysical law, anti-factual, and provably false fairy tale.

Regarding not addressing counter-arguments, I did address them, such as NIST's antiphysical suggestion that the yellow-hot molten metal that cascaded off the South Tower was burning organic materials entrained in molten aluminum.

Concerning the 9/11 event outside of New York City, it's only logically necessary to demonstrate that the US government was involved in executing one or more of the attacks that day. Even if one were to implausibly maintain that the US government wasn't involved in the other 9/11 attacks that day, the US government is still guilty of mass-murdering its own subjects on 9/11.

2) Your argument about the Second World War suffers from an inability to separate the issue of Germany and the domination of Europe as an historical problem dating from 1870, and your confused ideas about global politics -you seem to suggest that there is a globalising imperative in politics that has been around since the Pharoahs, as a conscious plan, but because of the way you frame an argument, this means that everything you cite to prove your theory, is right, because your theory says so!

I never said that. Rather, the plan for the world government has been in place since at least Cecil Rhodes, as I detail in my article.

What you are referring to is libido dominandi, i.e., the lust for domination. The strong tendency is for government rulers to attempt to gain ever-more power by any means they can. I never said that there has been any plan for world government passed down through successive governments. Rather, what I said is that the methodologies of statecraft have been passed down through the court intellectuals and through observation of what has worked in the past, i.e., the techniques of subjugation. This isn't some overarching plan, but rather simply a collection of techniques.

3) You call the invasion of Poland in 1939 the key moment in European history, where others would cite the Re-Militarisation of the Rhineland in 1936, or for that matter the failure of German state to deal with Hitler after the Munich Putsch -he was still an Austrian citizen at the time and in theory and fact could have been deported after serving time in prison. The Rhineland issue is critical because without military cover France and Britain would have had easier access to the industrial Ruhr to disrupt any war Hitler planned as part of his vision -once re-militarised, Hitler had secured his western flank, and could focus on removing humans from the 'East' in preparation for his new Aryan civilisation to be populated by the sons of Germany.

I merely stated the fact that Germany's invasion of Poland was the start of World War II, and I pointed out that the German government's self-proclaimed casus belli for this invasion was the phoney Operation Himmler false-flag staged terrorism campaign.

4) If it is the case that the 'global oligarchy' benefits from wars, why are there now fewer wars historically than ever before with fewer casualties, as Steven Pinker has argued, undermining a substantial part of your thesis.

First of all, Steven Pinker has to ignore most casualties in order to come up with the phoney statistics that he bandies about. I'll also here point out that Steven Pinker is a raging etatist who thinks that total government is the Savior of mankind, and his overall thesis is that government is the reason we have to thank for supposedly less killing (which is at any rate absurd, since it is governments which are responsible for all of the greatest atrocities in history).

The statistics that Pinker cites for the Communist mass-slaughters (such as at http://stevenpinker.com/pages/freque...e-has-declined ) are too low by around 100 million deaths.

Second of all, you're homogenizing wars. I never said that some amorphous blob called "war" is good for the globalist oligarchy. Rather, the wars they start are ones that they engage in in order to gain more power. It's not that total world war all the time would be in their interest.

But as I point out in my article, the globalist oligarchy are setting up a totalitarian world system where they can effect the extermination of the commonality of mankind as technology advances to the stage when technological immortality will be a reality. When this stage is reached, no good can come the the ruling elite by allowing the masses to live, because if this technology fell into the hands of the commoners then via such a mass-empowerment the ruling class would be in mortal danger of being punished by the masses for their many past and ongoing horrific crimes committed against the commonality.

5) Who benefitted from the Iran-Iraq war -it bankrupted those two states and led directly to the invasion of Kuwait and the sanctions regime -you can argue that arms manufacturers and smugglers benefited, but given the recent history, it seems you would put Iran-Iraq, Kuwait and Gulf War II into a repetitive syndrome, a great con-game in which the 'masters of the universe' deliberately engage in wars to eliminate useless humans and make a lot of money, and I don't accept that.

I never mentioned anything about the US government-backed war against Iran by Iraq or Gulf War I in my article. But if you're just asking me here out of curiosity:

Saddam has been in bed with the U.S. government for quite some time. The US government groomed him for his position as the leader of Iraq (in the US-supported-and-funded Ba'ath party), as he showed good leadership skills and an ability to work closely with the US government during his period as an assassin for the Ba'ath party. In one of his assassination assignments Saddam was shot in the leg--this occured during Saddam's attempted assassination of Iraqi Prime Minister Abdul Karim Qassim in 1959.

The Ba'athists finally came into power in a bloody US-funded coup in 1963. As the BBC recounts:

""
The coup that brought the Ba'ath Party to power in 1963 was celebrated by the United States.

The CIA had a hand in it. They had funded the Ba'ath Party--of which Saddam Hussein was a young member--when it was in opposition.

US diplomat James Akins served in the Baghdad Embassy at the time.

"I knew all the Ba'ath Party leaders and I liked them," he told me.

"The CIA were definitely involved in that coup. We saw the rise of the Ba'athists as a way of replacing a pro-Soviet government with a pro-American one and you don't get that chance very often.

"Sure, some people were rounded up and shot but these were mostly communists so that didn't bother us".
""

From "Saddam's parallel universe", Allan Little, BBC, January, 2003 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/programm...nt/2694885.stm

On July 25, 1990, eight days before the August 2, 1990 invasion of Kuwait by Iraq, Saddam Hussein met with April Glaspie, then America's ambassador to Iraq. During this time Hussein had already amassed troops on the border with Kuwait, and it was the last high-level contact between the two countries before Iraq invaded. During this meeting Glaspie asked Hussein his intentions regarding Kuwait, whereupon he told her of his intention of enforcing his claim on that country and asked her what the US government's position is regarding his intentions. From a transcript of the meeting, released that September, Glaspie replied: "We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts", the transcript reports Glaspie saying, "such as your disagreement with Kuwait. Secretary [of State James] Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction ... that Kuwait is not associated with America."

At first the US government attempted to deny the accuracy of the transcript, but later April Glaspie herself confirmed the central issue concerning that meeting:

""
In an interview with The New York Times the day before the record was published, Ms. Glaspie corroborated the key point. She is an experienced, widely respected professional diplomat, and chose her words with care.

"I wish I had been the only one in the world who was right," she said. "Obviously, I didn't think--and nobody else did--that the Iraqis were going to take all of Kuwait."
""

From "Between-Lines Disaster", Flora Lewis, New York Times, September 19, 1990 http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/19/op...pagewanted=all

6) At one point you argue that 'Jewish banking families' are part of the One World Order Conspiracy (to put Lucifer on the throne of the world), yet a Jew and scion of the banking family Lord Edwin Montagu was aggressively opposed to precisely the same Balfour Declaration (and indeed a Jewish state of any description) which you claim was part of this deal. You cannot get away with saying at one and the same time 'Jewish bankers' were part of the plan and not part of the plan. You also don't deal with the fact that the Balfour Declaration and indeed the League of Nations mandates were not supported by the people who lived in the Middle East but I guess the views of ordinary people are never part of your argument, as popular opinon indeed, people are irrelevant in your scheme of things, your focus is exclusively on the oligarchs. Yet, if 'we' are just little people, why were there so many insurrections against French rule in Syria, and the bitter insurrection against the British in Mesopotamia/Iraq in 1920? None of this figures in your argument, because it doesn't fit with your theory -people are opposed to imperialism, colonialism, racism, wars, and so on, but they are not necessarily guided by Christianity, which for you is the core propulsion of resistance to Lucifer, L Ron Hubbard, Aleister Crowley, George W. Bush et al.

I never said that there aren't people opposed the New World Order. After all, I'm one of those who is opposed to it. Nor did I ever say that the efforts of people to oppose global tyranny don't have positive effects in the world. The entire reason why I wrote this article is to help save people's souls (i.e., the programs of their minds) by warning them about what is to take place and why it is occurring.

I gave the history of Jewish functionaries being in service to non-Jewish royalty going back to the Babylonian Exile (or back to ancient Egypt if one takes as reliable the Exodus account). But the Rothschilds are the highest cast of Jewish functionaries to the European royalty, and so I focused on them in this regard.

However, the window of opportunity for the common masses to depose governments and create a genuinely free society closed circa 1950. Around that time powerful weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear bombs, because more available (the first Soviet atom bomb explosion occurred on August 29, 1949).

Thus, if a nuclear bomb were to go off in the United States, the US government could blame it on the USSR, and vice versa.

What this means is that around this time and later it was no longer possible for the masses to actually rise up and throw off government in itself, since the superpowers could alway just release weapons upon their own populations until the masses lost resolve and then the government could pose as the Savior in the aftermath.

(The Soviet Union indeed fell, but the KGB is still running Russia under their new name of the FSB, with former KGB spy Vladimir Putin being the current Prime Minister and the former President of Russia. So the actual oligarchs remain untouched.)

This is the reason why Jesus Christ's Second Coming is a physical necessity, because existence would not be possible if the oligarchy were allowed to obtain this coming technology, since the collapse phase of the universe will require a high level of free-market cooperation and mutually-beneficial exchange in order to coordinate the Taublike collapse trajectories of the universe during its Mixmaster oscillations as the radius of the universe diverges to its final singularity (i.e., the Omega Point), of which process continues forever in experiential time.

7) One small point: Britain was 'awarded' the mandate over Palestine at the San Remo Conference in 1920 and sent Herbert Samuel to Jerusalem as its first High Commissioner later that year, not in 1922. You imply that Chatham House is no longer the Royal Institute for International Affairs, but that, legally, is still its name; Chatham House is just a re-branding exercise. There are other factual errors I spotted in the paper but I have not read it thoroughly.

The British Mandate for Palestine was formally legally agreed-to in 1922, and came into effect in 1923.

Since 2004, Chatham House is the primary name which the think-tank chooses to go by ( http://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us ):

""
Council in 2004 decided to adopt 'Chatham House' as the primary identity for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which remains the formal name for legal and financial purposes.
""

8) Finally: Walid (sometimes Wallace) Fard (pronouced Far'ud), the author of Yacub's Book and creator of the Lost-Found Nation of Islam, was, according to Elijah Mohammed, God made flesh -Fard founded the 'Nation' in 1930 and 'disappeared' in 1934. It means that we have photographs of Almighty God which you have not cited; ok so its not the Turin Shroud, and it may be a disappointment to some that God looks like a shifty Arab from Detroit, but if you believe there is a God then you need to explain why you don't believe Fard was God, but there is no discussion of the 'Nation' and its 'Mother Plane', or indeed of mainstream Islam in your paper.

For the historical reliability of Jesus Christ's bodily resurrection and the untenability of theories which deny his resurrection, see Prof. William Lane Craig, "Contemporary Scholarship and the Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ", Truth: A Journal of Modern Thought, Vol. 1 (1985), pp. 89-95, http://leaderu.com/truth/1truth22.html , http://webcitation.org/69KCm4WtO . For more on the historicity of Jesus Christ's resurrection, see William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 3rd ed., 2008), Ch. 8: "The Resurrection of Jesus", pp. 333-404, particularly pp. 360 ff.

Christianity as described in the New Testament is preferentially selected by the known laws of physics due to the inherently triune structure of the cosmological singularity and the many other congruities with the known laws of physics. The many, many perfect and striking congruities of Christianity as described in the New Testament with the Omega Point cosmology are astronomically improbable without Jesus Christ having been informed by a superintelligence. Again, for details on this, see Sec. 8.2.2: "The Mark of the Beast", and Sec. 9: "The Omega Point Cosmology Vis-à-Vis the New Testament" of my following article (as well as many other sections of the article which deal with the consilience of Christianity with science).

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), August 6, 2012 (orig. pub. December 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , http://archive.org/details/ThePhysic...ryOfEverything , http://scribd.com/doc/79273334 , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redfor...ics-of-God.pdf , http://webcitation.org/69kSvuziV , http://flashmirrors.com/files/1foosl...ics-of-God.pdf .

And see Sec. 8.1.1: "The Dysteleology of Life without God" of my foregoing article for why life is logically pointless if God does not exist.

[Jamie Michelle]

My article "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", published under my legal name, and published at the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), has been ameliorated on August 6, 2012. The updated links to it are in the below.

James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), August 6, 2012 (orig. pub. December 19, 2011), 186 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1974708 , http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708

Below are other places where this article can be downloaded:

Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
1,740,849 bytes
MD5: 20b5fffb10038ab679cd7be4825176a1

http://theophysics.host56.com/Redfor...ics-of-God.pdf
http://www.webcitation.org/69kSgTGXl

http://theophysics.ifastnet.com/Redf...ics-of-God.pdf
http://www.webcitation.org/69kSvuziV

http://flashmirrors.com/files/1foosl...ics-of-God.pdf
http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=817860
http://www.ziddu.com/download/200720...f-God.pdf.html
http://bitshare.com/files/dez2dqpa/R...f-God.pdf.html
http://www.filedropper.com/redford-physics-of-god_1
http://www.MegaShare.com/4452670
http://www.unibytes.com/lEqk9EJrA80Lqw-Us4P3UgBB
http://www.2shared.com/document/LZko...cs-of-God.html
http://www.crocko.com/F0E60B3C041E42...ics-of-God.pdf
http://fileshare.in.ua/6551116

Note that the above publication date, the total page count, the file byte size, and the MD5 checksum are subject to change with newer versions of the article, if I were to release such.

The URLs to my Theophysics websites should contain the latest version of the article. With the WebCite URLs ( http://www.webcitation.org ), one can look to see if there is a newer version of this article on the drop-down menu containing the date. Also look at the postings in this forum to see if I have published updated URLs to newer versions of this article, assuming I am unable to update this post.

[loveboof]

Wow. I'm not going to read that at all...

I apologise for being so rude and willfully ignorant of your opinion, but unfortunately your jargon filled, nonsensical ramblings, filled with historical inaccuracies and mind boggling leaps in logic make for a serious snoozefest of a read!

Just take this for example (read it as if you're being introduced to the topic for the first time):

This is the reason why Jesus Christ's Second Coming is a physical necessity, because existence would not be possible if the oligarchy were allowed to obtain this coming technology, since the collapse phase of the universe will require a high level of free-market cooperation and mutually-beneficial exchange in order to coordinate the Taublike collapse trajectories of the universe during its Mixmaster oscillations as the radius of the universe diverges to its final singularity (i.e., the Omega Point), of which process continues forever in experiential time.

That is either complete nonsense or you desperately need to learn how to write! (in an engaging way - i.e good writing)

[buttslinger]

My brother's pal from school worked on the team with George F. Smoot and John C. Mather, winners of the Nobel Peace Prize for their work on the big bang theory (not the TV show) He said even though these guys had brains coming out of their ears, that they also got bummed out, had fights, were jealous, all the human frailties that come out when you're trying to get your work done. One of the guys, I don't know which one, was the MOTHER of the team. He unruffled feathers, talked people down, calmed tempers and unbruised egos. He was like the Mother of all geniuses.
My brother's friend had a father who worked at the Naval Observatory and used to school Junior. My Mom substitute taught him in Elementary School, she didn't like him, thought he was a pompous little ass. By the time he got to High School he was always correcting the teachers.
I'll have to get a big steaming cup of Joe and try to wade into Jaime's Opus, but I can't even understand half the words. I've always thought God was rooted in Biology.

[Stavros]

Rather than reply to Jamie's responses to my critical comments on parts of her original ppaper, I have divided my response into two parts.

Part I: Cosmology

In an attempt to take seriously the new version of the paper Jamie has made available, I have read that part of it which I understand, and have divided this very long response into two parts, dealing with the Cosmology as far as I can in part 1; and the ‘History’ in a second post which will appear after this one in the next day or so.

Since this thread was initiated by Jamie French, she has re-written the paper that she has made available on the weblinks in her post.

For those of you who do not want to read the whole of my refutation of the paper written by Jamie French, my resume is as follows:

The author, who claims that Frank Tipler’s work has been published in peer-reviewed science journals and that this gives Tipler a position of respect, deliberately ignores the ridicule and rejection that his version of ‘Intelligent Design’ has produced.
There are examples here:
http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/v...sicsChrist.htm
http://www.joly.org.uk/gordo/ellis3.html
http://sfgospel.typepad.com/sf_gospe...ianity.html--a relatively positive review of The Physics of Christianity.

Instead, Jamie uses Tipler’s anti-evolutionary cosmology to argue not only that God exists, but that most of recorded human history since the death of Jesus has been a giant conspiracy to undermine the legacy, the values and the message of Jesus Christ. Omega Point Cosmology not only proves the existence of God, it predicts a ‘Day of Judgement’ as an event –or sequence of events- in which those with the ‘Mark of the Beast’ will be punished, and those who have accepted Jesus into their hearts will be saved. A global conspiracy led by ‘the Rothschilds’ (phoney Jews who make a mockery of Jews and Judaism) has enabled the rulers of Empires and States to form secretive societies –the Illuminati, the Freemasons, the Bilderberg Group et al- to maintain their campaign of financial greed and universal evil, based around a pagan pre-Christian and indeed, Anti-Christian cult. Using Government as the instrument of absolute evil, God has forced humans to live through the evils of mass murder and hatred in order to learn the difference between it and the absolute purity of Christ’s message. No Pain, No Gain. The paper draws on numerous events in history to show how this Global Conspiracy has victimised ordinary people –mostly through hugely destructive world wars and genocide- and claims that only those who have lived in the way of Jesus will be saved.

I am not sure how far Jamie has actually understood the theory of Frank Tipler, but here is a succinct resume of his theories by a scientist:

In The Physics of Immortality, Tipler provided the mechanism by which we will all live forever. In a billion-billion years or so, life in the form of highly advanced and supremely intelligent robots, evolved from those that we humans invented and sent into space before destroying ourselves as a species, will have spread throughout the universe. At that point the robots will control the collapse of the universe down to a final singularity called the Omega Point. Following the teaching of the famous Jesuit paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who died in 1955, Tipler associates the Omega Point with God, in particular, God the Father, the First Person of the Trinity. This also follows from God's message to Moses in Exodus 3:14, "I SHALL BE WHAT I SHALL BE. The collapse to the final singularity takes an infinite time as viewed from inside the universe. During that time the robots recreate all the humans and life forms that ever existed in a computer simulation. Not only do we all live our lives over again in that simulation, but over and over and over again. And not just our lives, but also all the possible lives we ever might have had, good and bad. That's the immortality Tipler says we can look forward to.
http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/v...sicsChrist.htm

It should be noted that Jamie has included this biographical note at the end of the paper:

Born in Austin, Texas and raised in the Leander, Texas hill country, James Redford is a born-again Christian who was converted from atheism by a direct revelation from Jesus Christ. He is a scientific rationalist who concludes that the Omega Point (i.e., the physicists’ technical term for God) and the Feynman–DeWitt–Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) are an unavoidable result of the known laws of physics (Page 12.

The starting point for Jamie’s version of Tipler’s cosmology is a book, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (1986) co-authored by John D. Barrow and Frank J.Tipler. Works subsequently written by Tipler form the main body of work on ‘Omega Point Cosmology’.

I have no expertise in hard science and am frequently baffled by cosmology; and to me the author has done nothing to advance the cause of those who rely on cosmology for the ‘big picture’ of how the Universe was created, and where it is going.

Here is a key point that drives much of the paper’s arguments:

The Omega Point is a term used by Prof. Tipler to designate the final cosmological singularity, which according to the known laws of physics is a physically-necessary cosmological state in the far future of the universe. Per the laws of physics, as the universe comes to an end at this singularity in a particular form of the Big Crunch, the computational capacity of the universe (in terms of both its processor speed and memory storage) increases unlimitedly with a hyperbolic growth rate as the radius of the universe collapses to zero, allowing an infinite number of bits to be processed and stored before the end of spacetime. Via this supertask, a simulation run on this cosmological computer can thereby continue forever in its own terms (i.e., in computer clock time, or experiential time), even though the universe lasts only a finite amount of proper time (page 4).

Crucially, the Omega Point is the definition of God…well sort of, as the author writes:
The Omega Point final singularity and its state of infinite informational capacity is by definition God, due to it having all the haecceities claimed for God by the traditional religions (as is detailed in Section 7.1). The final singularity is actually a different aspect of the Big Bang initial singularity, i.e., the first cause, a definition of God held by the Abrahamic religions. (page 4).

The key point here is that of all the world’s religions and belief systems, the only one that matters is Christianity. As the author remarks, without naming Islam, Hinduism Buddhism or any other religion of system of belief:

Christian theology is therefore preferentially selected by the known laws of physics due to the fundamentally triune structure of the Cosmological Singularity within the Omega Point cosmology, which is deselective of all other major religions (Section 7.1, p44).

Indeed, the author, having dismissed all other religions from her mathematical equation, goes further in claiming that

Jesus Christ founded the only civilization in history to pull itself out of the muck, and along with it the rest of the world. A great irony is that even antitheists benefit enormously from the civilization that Christ founded: indeed, almost all of the Earth’s current population—and hence, almost all antitheists—couldn’t even be alive were it not for the advancements made by Christian civilization (page 33).

There is no need to mention the achievements of ‘Science and Civilization in China’, no need to mention the crucial role that Islamic civilisation played in keeping alive the science of the Greeks and the Romans when Europeans were not interested in it; as well as its own achievements, because when you crunch the numbers, the Chinese and the Muslims are, quite simply, irrelevant to the history of science.

But to get back to that moment when the universe collapses and the super-computer starts up: If you want to know HOW this computational capacity has been reached, the author writes:

The known laws of physics require there be intelligent civilizations in existence at the appropriate time in order to force the collapse of the universe and then manipulate its collapse so that the computational capacity of the universe can diverge to infinity (Page 4)

This divergence is performed by human life that has transferred

its information processes to higher energy states, eventually using elementary particles to directly compute on via traveling waves and standing waves. As the radius of the universe goes to zero, the matter energy of the universe goes to positive infinity, thereby allowing the number of particle states in which to store information to diverge to infinity (page 5).

The computing power that these ‘higher energy states’ have enables them to compute the whole of life from the beginning of the Big Bang, and in the process go further by colonising space:

The interstellar colonization phase required for achieving the Omega Point will be accomplished by naturally-evolved sapient life forms (with such species independently evolved on average roughly every Hubble volume2) whose brains have been transformed (e.g., with nanotechnology) into artificial computers (such as quantum computers) onboard tiny starships of circa one kilogram that will exponentially colonize space, many times faster than mortal human beings. The incredible expense of keeping flesh-and-blood humans alive in space makes it highly improbable that such humans will ever personally travel to other stars. Instead, highly efficient substrate transformations of naturally-evolved sapient minds and artificial intelligences will spread civilization throughout space. Given the rate of exponential growth of human technological development, this colonization phase should likely start before 2100 (page 5).

The crucial point here is the way in which Tipler, supported by the author, presents human beings as machines, capable therefore of evolving into, in effect, super-computers.

The discussion of the Omega Point in Jamie’s paper continues by supporting the theory of Prof Tipler, and discusses the way in which Science has tried to accommodate itself or distance itself from God through various interpretations of the ‘Big Bang’, culminating in Tipler’s book The Physics of Christianity (2007). Further discussion of science and the physics of the Omega Point are presented up to page 33, but I don’t understand it so I cannot comment.

The rest of the paper, from Section 6 on p33 to p121, is discussion of the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the Omega Point cosmology (from the Abstract).

It is difficult for me to offer a summary of a cosmology that I do not understand, but I think I know enough about the history of civilisations to believe that it is nothing but pure arrogance, as well as a factual error, to claim that it is only the work of European scientists working in a culturally and theologically Christian environment that has any value in the history of science. This is Western Imperialism of the Mind taken to a really quite offensive level. No allowance is made, for example, in the history of medicine, which is part of science, for the use of Quinine as an anti-malarial in China and Peru long before Ronald Ross in the 19th century discovered the transmission of the disease through the bite of an infected mosquito (in India). It is also the case that Tipler, rather obviously, believes that ‘Intelligent Design’ explains the origin of the universe, not evolution; and that there has been no human agency in the creation of climate change and advanced global warming, which has been caused by sunspots.

The colonisation of space has me completely baffled, it seems to me to an idea that has more relevance to Star Trek. We have enough issues for science to deal with right here on Planet Earth, without seeing a need to send our robotic clones into the Galaxy to spread the word of Jesus.

[Stavros]

Part II
The section of Jamie’s paper that deals with the social, ethical, economic
and political implications of the Omega Point cosmology interprets the whole of human history as the act of a Christian God whose plan has been laid out in the Bible, the New Testament and the Book of Revelation in particular.

I have read Jamie’s paper, and I would like to say something positive about it, but the core arguments and the interpretation of secondary literature contain no merit. There is no original research in this paper, there are numerous errors of fact, and distortions of historical truth, but above all, for someone who claims to be a Born Again Christian, there is an arrogance and disregard for non-Christian cultures that undermines a key value in Christianity to love one’s neighbour as oneself.

It would be a tedious exercise to go though the paper to point out all of its errors and distortions. I have also not responded to the earlier comments to the first paper now that it has been replaced.

1) Consider Jamie’s responses to matters of life and death:
The answer as to why anything exists as opposed to nothingness is that existence is mathematics, i.e., logic. Only this and nothing more. (p37-thirty-eight).

This explanation is then undermined completely by the numerous references that are made to the narrative of Jesus’s life in the Gospels, and her own insistence that only Christians whose belief and behaviour are pure and based on the teachings of Jesus can attain eternal life. No reference to mathematics at all.

And now consider Jamie’s response to the hypothesis that there is no meaning to life:

If it could be definitely proved that God and eternal life do not exist, then the only rational course would be to commit suicide. The reason for this is because even if one is presently enjoying one’s life, tragedy and horrific pain can strike at almost any time, quite apart from how one lives one’s life. Since one can have no real control over whether one ends up in a situation of horrific pain, the only rational course if God and eternal life do not exist would be to commit a painless suicide. Since in such a hypothetical scenario one’s eternal death is certain anyway, one might as well get there in a manner which ensures the least pain. (p54).

Suicide as an option for those who reject Christ the Saviour is to me a perversion of Christ’s message. Sadly, this intolerance of other people’s views is common among doctrinal Christians who in reality are unable to love their neighbour, regardless of what the neighbour thinks or believes –I can’t imagine a real Christian recommending suicide to their neighbour.

2) The negative view of the Christian Church is amplified through its association with government because all government is a wicked and violent conspiracy against Jesus:

Government is a massive death-cult which requires gargantuan levels of human sacrifice. The bloody human sacrifice is still regarded by mankind as the most sacred of ritual, instead of being viewed as the depraved and ghoulish institution it is. The human-sacrifice orgies in which throngs of lamentably deceived people kill and get killed so that a relative handful of the most rich and powerful can become even more rich and powerful are made holy by the secular priesthood of power which officiates the state’s bloodstained pantheon that sits atop a mountain of rotting human corpses. Truth is the most hated thing in the world (p 56).

There is no room here for political theory, no room for any sense of the way in which government has changed over time, no room for an argument about what the meaning of sacrifice might be, and, critically, why human societies and their governments have actually striven to avoid human sacrifice. Why for example, did Japan sue for peace in 1945 when the opportunity to slaughter another million was available?

Jamie has no interest in any faith other than Christianity, all other faiths are either dismissed as irrelevant, or in the case of Judaism, presented as essentially pagan religions that came ‘too soon’ for the truth of Christ, even though Christ was a Jew. This intolerance of other faiths is a denial of the Christian idea that one should love one’s neighbour as oneself, regardless of that person’s belief. It also trashes thousands of years of culture and civilisation which according to Jamie was created by the same God that created her. Not a democratic view of other cultures.

The claim that:
Not only are all governments inherently terroristic, but they are by far the largest and most murderous terrorist organizations in existence. Just within the last century governments butchered over 200 million people, almost all of them innocent noncombatants (p65)...

Ignores the devastation caused by the Plague or ‘Black Death’ in Europe and Asia, by Influenza, Malaria, Measles and Smallpox and Meningitis all over the world; yet not only have flies, fleas and mosquitoes caused vast deaths, there is no discussion of the role played by nature in ‘God’s Plan’, perhaps because Jamie thinks it unimportant. It matters because Jamie believes in Intelligent Design, and should therefore at least offer an explanation for God’s role as the slayer of billions. Presumably nothing happens by accident –tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, epidemics: these must all be acts of God, for what else can they be in Jamie’s scheme of things?

3) An inability to analyse historical events.
Jamie gets even deeper into the mire when attempting to depict the duplicity of state terrorism using ‘false-flag’ operations to start wars –the Reichstag Fire (1933) and the attacks on German units on the Polish border in 1939; Pearl Harbour in 1941, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident in Vietnam in 1964. The problem with these accounts is that Jamie does not know how to analyse historical events. A common mistake made by high school students is to mistake an event for a cause –the false-flag events Jamie draws attention to may have been the events that sparked war, but the cause lay somewhere else –the need for the Nazi’s to eliminate opposition parties in the Reichstag; Germany’s belief that it could not survive unless it were the dominant state in Europe; the USA’s determination to prevent Communism from taking root in South-east Asia. FH Hinsley discussed the difference between ‘occasions’ and ‘causes’ in history in Power and the Pursuit of Peace (1961), and is still worth reading as a guide to historical methods.

The inability to understand historical events is evident in the depiction of secretive societies such as the Illuminati, the Freemasons and the Bilderberg Group as leading actors in the conspiracy of the Beast at war with Jesus. The ‘Rothschilds’ are trotted out as the manipulators of power behind the thrones, although Jamie claims

…the current head Rothschilds are Jewish by ancestry only, not by religion or culture: as given the pagan, neo-Egyptian occult symbolism of the Israeli Supreme Court building built by the Rothschilds the Rothschilds obviously hold Jewish religion and culture in contemptuous mockery (p91)

To confirm that the modern state of Israel is integral to the creation of the beast’s one world government, Jamie quotes Israel’s first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, but out of context in order to promote her point. Thus Jamie claims

David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel, stated in a 1962 article for Look magazine that this court in Jerusalem would become “the Supreme Court of Mankind”…(p92)

In fact, in 1962 Ben-Gurion was responding to a common page-filler used by newspapers and journals, and asked to predict what the world would be like in 25 years time, the brief article is here;

"The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: the Cold War will be a thing of the past. Internal pressure of the constantly growing intelligentsia in Russia for more freedom and the pressure of the masses for raising their living standards may lead to a gradual democratization of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, the increasing influence of the workers and farmers, and rising political importance of men of science, may transform the United States into a welfare state with a planned economy. Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and democratic regime. With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the scene of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah. Higher education will be the right of every person in the world. A pill to prevent pregnanacy will slow down the explosive natural increase in China and India. And by 1987, the average life-span of man will reach 100 years."
http://theinfounderground.com/forum/...hp?f=21&t=1641

4) Jamie attacks her Inspiration
On page 96 she writes:
The great tyrannies of the 20th century were first and foremost an attempt to abolish Christianity. The reason for this governmental antagonism against Christianity is the same reason this temperament is so prevalent in current academia. Both academia and the corporate media in our present day are grafted to the hip of the state, and the natural tendency of the state is to tolerate no God before it.

Does this also apply to Prof. Frank Tipler of Tulane University? Jamie’s paper is rooted in the belief that Tipler has proven the existence of God. But he has tenure on the hip of the Beast.

I could go on and on, but it just gets more embarrassing. Arguing in a footnote that Karl Marx did not invent the concepts of class and class struggle –something every sociology undergraduate has known for years, Jamie (n223, ninety-eigt) goes on to give ‘early examples’ of class struggle but they are all references to the books of the Bible, and I couldn’t find any that referred to class or class struggle.

5) Beheading is the natural form of execution for the Beast One-World Government, but it will end in tears for the anti-Christ:
Of course, the heads of all the innocent people beheaded for their witness of Jesus Christ and their refusal to accept the Mark of the Beast, if they were to be cryogenically stored as part of the world government’s program into researching mind-uploading, would be nicely preserved and available for technological resurrection if the world government were deposed, as Revelation says it indeed will be. Such people—the meek—would reign on Earth and go on colonize space, never to die again. Their minds will be immortal minds with vastly more computational resources than current human minds, and hence they could create any reality they could conceive via computer simulation. That is, they would live in literal heaven, i.e., paradise (p106-107).

Destined for colonial rule, the world is not enough for superhumans. If there are ‘alien beings’ on the new planets the new superhumans colonise, will they be exterminated if they refuse to accept the message of Christ?

6) Are we really human, if we are evolving into computers? Last word to Jamie:

Left to their own devices, the Sun will eventually move off the main sequence (main sequence stars use hydrogen in their cores as their fuel by fusing it into helium via nuclear fusion) and become a red giant; in the process, in approximately 7.6 billion years from now the Earth will be engulfed by the Sun and incinerated. Although before this destruction can take place, the future immortal beings will dismantle the Earth and convert its mass into computing machines, upon which the Earth’s biosphere will be preserved through simulation. However, during the eventual collapse phase of the universe, the temperature of the universe will diverge to infinity. The matter of the universe will eventually become hot plasma. As the temperature continues to increase, it will subsequently become too hot for the atomic elements to exist, at which point information processing and storage will have to be encoded via traveling waves and standing waves, eventually using using elementary particles to directly compute on, with the universe itself acting as the container to enclose the waves. The matter which now makes up the Earth will eventually be ionized into plasma, but by then life will have gained control over all matter in the universe and converted it into superintelligent computers (p112).