View Poll Results: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
- Voters
- 91. You may not vote on this poll
-
The Beatles
62 68.13% -
The Rolling Stones
29 31.87%
Results 71 to 80 of 105
-
12-18-2011 #71
Re: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
Yeah I think Brian's loss changed the Stones path, but Brian was out of the band when he died. I think Keith wanted a more blues based sound than where Brian wanted to go, and there was rivalry between him and Mick I hear. I don't really know much about that split though.
It would have been fun to hear where the Beatles would have gone had they stayed together through the 70s. The Beatles are the 60s to me, and Led Zeppelin, The Stones, Queen Black Sabbath etc are the 70s. I don't know if the Beatles could have continued.
-
12-18-2011 #72
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 330
Re: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
Beatles were a pop band
Stones were a rock band.
Chalk and cheese.
-
12-18-2011 #73
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 222
Re: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
This is simple The Stones are the greatest Rock and Roll Band ever, however the Beattles spoke to and about a generation and changed history. Beatles is the answer on a head to head competition or if you had to load your iPod with only one bands music.
-
12-19-2011 #74
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 330
Re: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
Dead Kennedys were better than the 2 of em
-
12-19-2011 #75
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 222
Re: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
Beatles from Revolver on were definitely not a pop band. Listen to Revolver, Sgt Pepper, Magical Mystery, Abbey Road, White Album those albums my friend is some serious rock and roll music, some of the best of all-time.
Remember the Beatles only performed once live as a band after Revolver was released in August of 1966 on the rooftop of Apple HQ, not even a concert just a jam session. I bring up this point because I think to mature as a band and have songs really reflect their true identity the songs must be explored and played live to fully appreciate the essence of the song.
-
12-19-2011 #76
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 222
-
12-19-2011 #77
Re: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
This is my issue. I know these songs are legitimate classics. I just don't like any of them. No offense intended at all. I recognize The Beatles like I would Frank Sinatra. Great talent but not my thing. I don't like The Who either and am not crazy about Zeppelin. I'm a Sabbath guy and Sabbath, Bloody Sabbath was my first album.
-
12-19-2011 #78
-
12-19-2011 #79
Re: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
Im stones fan there still rocking even with one foot in grave lol
-
12-19-2011 #80
Re: The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
I spent my teens dissing the Beatles, mainly because I was sick of listening to people go on and on about how great they were and how important John Lennon was blah blah blah.
But later after I calmed down a bit and realized how many songs they had made and how many tunes that I liked were in fact Beatles songs, I gave in and admitted that they did not suck.
They will never mean to me what they mean to my parents generation, but they did record a bloodly lot of catchy tunes.
Similar Threads
-
Greatest Beatles song makeover
By buckjohnson in forum General DiscussionReplies: 63Last Post: 10-09-2011, 08:12 PM -
Nirvana vs Stones
By JamesHunt in forum General DiscussionReplies: 10Last Post: 10-01-2009, 07:38 PM -
The Beatles...............
By JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel in forum General DiscussionReplies: 17Last Post: 09-09-2009, 02:06 AM -
rolling stones playing halftime at super bowl
By hwbs in forum Sports LoungeReplies: 1Last Post: 01-19-2006, 09:43 PM -
Vote for TS Beatles - What's your choice?
By johnxyz9 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 8Last Post: 09-21-2005, 06:01 AM