Results 1 to 10 of 24
Thread: Los Angeles or San Francisco???
-
02-06-2006 #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 35
Los Angeles or San Francisco???
Hi all!
I am planning a trip this week, and have a choice of going to either LA or SF. It's sort of a dilemma for me.
On one hand, I've heard of the SF club Divas, which I've never been to before. I hear that it's also open for business during the week. So, I figure I would have many nights to hang out and date.
On the other hand, in LA - I've heard of club 7969, which is (as I understand it) THE place to be on a Monday and Friday. If I arrive in LA this Weds or Thurs, that would only give me one night (Friday) to score. As I understand it club 7969 is only open on Monday and Friday, and that there are no other places to hang out during the week. Also, on eros, it appears that there are a lot more LA TS escorts than in SF.
Whether I go to LA or SF, I will not be renting a car - but instead rely on taxis to get around - so that may also limit my eros dating abilities. That's why I hoping to use the club scene to hook up - unless of course, they would be willing to meet me at a club.
If you were me, which city would be best? LA or SF?
Thanks,
SIS
P.S. - has anyone here ever asked an eros escort to show them around the TS club scene (for a $$ of course)? I figure there may be no better way to get the low down on a town than from a local.
-
02-06-2006 #2
LA may be better as far as the TS scene goes, but IMO San Franciso is a better city from virtually every other perspective.
-Quinn
Life is essentially one long Benny Hill skit punctuated by the occasional Anne Frank moment.
-
02-06-2006 #3
yea, San Fran is a better city but L.A. is the place to score if that's the basis of the trip.
Asking one of the escorts might be a good idea. Tell me how that goes...
too much french fries, not enough shakes...
-
02-06-2006 #4
Well, neither city is a slouch in the TS dept. Eros currently shows *only* 60 girls v. LA's 114--but how many girls do you need? 1 or 2 should do it, no? I'm far more attracted to SF as a city, so I'd let that make my decision, along with scanning the listings for a girl I'd like to see.
-
02-07-2006 #5
SanFran has a cool vibe thats not present here in L.A.
You can also get around most of the city in a short period of time. Definately not the case in L.A.
-
02-07-2006 #6
Go with SF.
And screw the taxis, get the Muni Passport. Ride all day on the one fare (Trolleys, cable cars, buses, trackless coach) anywhere in the city. Take your gurl on a romantic cable car ride to Ghiradelli Square (There's some nice hotels within walking distance all along the Fisherman's Wharf/Embarcadero).
Dress warm, the weather is freaky there.
-
02-07-2006 #7
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Bay Area, CA
- Posts
- 3,105
You know,
I live in the Bay Area and I've wanted to go to Diva's for a while, I just haven't.
If you wanna go, I'm down, and no (in case your wondering) I'm not gay.
At any rate, this week to check out Divas is probably as good as any.
Let me know.
-
02-07-2006 #8Originally Posted by Perverted Monk
In my opinion its the better choice all around.
"Friends don't let friends drink and post"
-
02-07-2006 #9Originally Posted by joyboy123
-
02-07-2006 #10
Re: Los Angeles or San Francisco???
Originally Posted by SleeplessInSeattle
I like the manager of 7969 and the owners of Divas the same. The neighborhood is better at 7969.
San Francisco is not a great city. If it didn't have character some might call it a shithole. It is unique maybe, but LA has much more to do.
V