America’s global push for LGBT rights...

[Ben]

America’s global push for LGBT rights

The U.S. announces that foreign aid will be tied to protection of sexual minorities. It could make a big impact

By Kevin Douglas Grant

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton during her speech on human rights issues in Geneva, Switzerland, Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 (Credit: AP Photo/Anja Niedringhaus)

The U.S. took a groundbreaking step on global LGBT rights Tuesday, joining the UK in tying foreign aid to governments’ protection of sexual minorities, raising the stakes in the increasingly globalized battle over gay rights.
The Obama administration’s sweeping initiative —which will potentially steer billions of dollars in U.S. aid toward countries and programs that protect rights while expanding efforts to protect LGBT refugees — was announced ahead of Human Rights Day. The timing reinforced a now-common refrain that has been spoken, chanted and shouted by rights activists around the world for decades: Gay rights equal human rights.
President Obama issued an official memorandum “directing all agencies engaged abroad to ensure that U.S. diplomacy and foreign assistance promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons,” while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made the American position clear to diplomats from around the world gathered at the United Nations in Geneva: “Gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights.”
America overwhelmingly remains the world’s largest provider of official development assistance, and the UK is the fourth-largest. Although the U.S. State Department has worked diligently behind the scenes to promote LGBT rights and cultural awareness via its embassies around the world, the agency has never before made such an overt move. Together the two powers have created a united front in a battle that has rapidly escalated in the past 10 years.
From the Netherlands’ legalization of same-sex marriage in 2001 to India’s decriminalization of homosexuality in 2009, many of the world’s laws have changed even if longstanding cultural practices and religious beliefs have not.
For some LGBT rights supporters, the irony of Obama and Clinton’s message is that the U.S. is not typically considered one of the most progressive countries for legal protections of LGBT rights. Since 1996, the federal Defense of Marriage Act has defined marriage as a heterosexual union, and just six states grant same-sex marriage licenses.
And of course, anti-gay bullying remains a corrosive and sometimes fatal cancer on society, while many communities have saved no place at the table for the gay, the trangendered or the intersex. Political leaders like Rick Santorum have continued to frame gay relationships as threatening to American society.
At the same time, public support for gay rights is on the rise and polls at over 50 percent. The U.S. military ended its Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy in September, and even anti-gay activists have conceded that America is moving toward a society that protects its LGBT population.
In October, UK Prime Minister David Cameron told a meeting of Commonwealth leaders that future British aid would be contingent on gay rights protections, drawing livid responses from several African leaders seen as targets of Cameron’s remarks.
“This is an issue where we are pushing for movement,” Cameron said, just weeks after throwing his support behind a new LGBT equality group called The Kaleidoscope Trust. “We are prepared to put some money behind what we believe.”
Leaders of countries including Uganda, Nigeria and Zimbabwe — where homosexuality is widely considered “un-African” and remains illegal — called Cameron out on his proclamation.
Ugandan presidential adviser John Nagenda said that Ugandans, who have gained a global reputation for creating an anti-gay climate since 2009, were “tired of these lectures” and were not to be treated like “children.”
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe called Cameron “satanic,” an illustration of the religious undertones of the often hostile international debate. Christian fundamentalist groups from the U.S. have made powerful inroads to Africa in recent years, evangelizing a conservative brand of Christianity with a profoundly anti-gay posture. Meanwhile conservative Muslim and Jewish groups have led campaigns against LGBT rights in countries ranging from the United States to Saudi Arabia.
As Graeme Reid, director of the LGBT rights program at Human Rights Watch, wrote for GlobalPost’s “Rainbow Struggle” series in November, the battle lines are being redrawn on a global scale, tipping societies toward equality in some places while invoking backlash in others.
“Instead of a move towards decriminalization, we see some countries introducing new legislation or tightening up on existing legislation or implementing previously dormant laws,” Reid wrote. “Stricter laws are seen as a way of shoring up ‘traditional culture.’ Of course, the irony that most of the sodomy laws are a vestige of colonialism in the first place is often lost.”
As the U.S. and the UK grapple with their own past and present imperial legacies, the bilateral commitment of foreign aid to more LGBT-tolerant countries is sure to give momentum to the equality movement. But as in the U.S. where LGBT policy is often contradictory and social attitudes vary widely — or in Spain where gay marriage is legal but discrimination persists — official acts are only part of the story.

[francisfkudrow]

Well, that's cool, but it will only last until the next President takes office.

[onmyknees]

So let me get this straight Ben...According to the article, because the US ended DADT, and and now public support has nosed over 50%, it seems like a good idea to take this show on the road? To where...Islamabad? Mecca? Medina ? Tehran? The West Bank? Cairo?

I read the speech, and as well intentioned as one might think....it never mentions the Arab world where women can't even drive or vote for the most part.....and we're going to convince them through some carrot and stick approach that those with different lifestyles should be not only protected but celebrated? Is there nothing we won't spend money we don't have on?
Certainly no one can argue with the premise, but how about the practicality of it? We're giving money to people who for the most part loath everything about our society, and don't even recognize human rights let alone Gay rights. It seems hopelessly naive to me...You're heart may be in the right place Ben, but your head is somewhere else.
While I suppose if you're going to hand thug regimes billions in foreign aid, you may as well tie some conditions to it, the entire premise of handing them anything seems flawed to me. Who will monitor this and assure the US taxpayers the billions aren't going down a rat hole....some State Department official in a cushy office in DC? How will we measure the success?...details please.

It occurs to me that human nature is such that when you're handing
reprobates money, and lots of it...they'll tell you whatever you wanna hear. Because of the centuries old world wide cultural resistance to equality and human dignity of others seems almost insurmountable, doesn't necissarily mean we shouldn't try, but it also doesn't mean we pump billions into cultures that haven't seen enlightenment in a thousand years in an attempt to make them more Western.

[Silcc69]

Man Hilary look old and decrypt in that pic.