Better Looking than Patricia Araujo

[CaptainPlanet]

Needsum do you really think that the tv in the picture will be taking her wig off and go to be a builder in the morning?and how did Patricia became what she is without being a tv before being a ts?

alot of TV/CD have no interest in being a true TS, thats not always the first step, in transitioning.

[valsoldese1]

Guys look under Patricia skirt and tell me if its different from the girl i see at the beginning ....actually yes its ...not as gorgeous ah ah

[JayR80]

For me Patricia wins hands down...but only my opinion. Each to their own....everyone has their own love/sex map in their head.

[valsoldese1]

Now this is another i can say better than Patricia

[olblueeyesuk]

gentlemen
my first post...
i've had the pleasure of patricia araujo on 2 of her visits to london
i can confirm that she is stunningly beautiful- the first visit was a few years ago - spoke NO english but was very active
her second visit was around 18 months ago? i think she'd had some penile surgery (possible filler) very unnecessary, and was 'sort' of active
possibly the best looking in the business?

[leckery5]

Patricia is possibly the most beautiful Tgirl. Maybe not the hottest but very possibly the most beautiful. For example, Pamela Anderson at her best was hot but few would argue she is/was one of the most beautiful women.

[SFTB]

Patricia Araujo is the kind of beauty you would want on your arm at some red carpet event!

[Jackal]

sorry? I don't see this as me putting down TVs. IMHO, there is simply no comparison, and a large part of that, for me, is the fact that the TV is not a gurl in any way. Patricia is blatantly feminine, the TV is not, despite the addition of some makeup which does glam her up but does not hide the fact that its still a man under the makeup.

Again, this is NOT a slam against her or any other TVs. This thread was started as a comparison between Patricia and someone who was quickly discovered to be a TV. In my view, there is no comparing the two.

You used the pronoun "he" and described her as a man with a wig on. IDK if the TV in question identifies as transgender IRL or not but some do. I just dislike the idea of dictating other people's gender ID, it reminds me of when I hear people saying TS women are not real women which is annoying and stupid. Yes, Patricia and Bruna are very feminine and more attractive than nearly anyone, I agree but I would not feel the need to put down someone I am not very attracted to or the people who do find her attractive(I think androgyny can be attractive in a woman so we probably have different tastes). Not all GGs and transwomen are blatantly feminine, either but that does not mean they are men or that they are not attractive to some people.

[llemming]

Patricia is about the most beautiful girl around...

[needsum]

You used the pronoun "he" and described her as a man with a wig on. IDK if the TV in question identifies as transgender IRL or not but some do. I just dislike the idea of dictating other people's gender ID, it reminds me of when I hear people saying TS women are not real women which is annoying and stupid. Yes, Patricia and Bruna are very feminine and more attractive than nearly anyone, I agree but I would not feel the need to put down someone I am not very attracted to or the people who do find her attractive(I think androgyny can be attractive in a woman so we probably have different tastes). Not all GGs and transwomen are blatantly feminine, either but that does not mean they are men or that they are not attractive to some people.

Sigh. Ugh. Ok, look, one last time on this and lets put it to rest, ok? I am NOT putting this person down for being a TV! how many times can I say this???? I am simply stating that, because shei is a TV and not a TS, there is no comparison, in my eyes. we all like different things fordirrerent reasons. So polease stop taking offense where no offensewas given or implied. If you go back and look at any of the posts I've made in the last month, you will see that I have very similar views in this forum as you, and that I'm not a classless asshole who comes here to put down anyone.

The fact remains that the TV in question advertised in one of those photos as being a TV. NOT A TS. Therefore, as I've already stated, from what I understand, (and AGAIN, I could be wrong) but a TV is not someone who dressed/lives real time/full time ALLTHE TIME. A TV is understood as a man who dressed up like a woman, for whatever the reasoning is. Passable? sure. could a TV be feminine and hot? of course. But in this case, as pretty as she is, she has no breasts, and is advertising as a TV. A TV can take off the makeup and voila, its a man, baby. For me, I lose interest. I want the full feminine aspects, not a part-time thing. Thats all I'm saying. So please, stop trying to defend her and all TVs already--I'm not on the attack here, ok? thanks.