Modern Warfare 3!

[hwbs]

I have the first 2 mw and skipped the rest ..they are fun but all the same...I'm waiting for skyrim to come out next week...

[Norma]

I have both MW3 and BF3, this isn't even a contest, MW3 is so much more enjoyable to play. BF3 is fun for a couple of hours then you realize just how crappy the gameplay is how much better everything is on MW3. I'm selling my BF3 because it just doesn't have good replay value, whereas MW3 you can play over and over. Plus the Survival mode is awesome!!!

Battlefield 3 is meant more for the PC version, If you're playing the xbox or ps3 version, yea, then I see why you think the play is crappy. The console versions are really watered down versions of the glorious PC version. Battlefield has always been a pc game that doesn't translate too well to consoles.

As far as Modern Warfare 3, Call of duty has been reskinning and recylcing it's game for 4 years now. Mw1 , reskinned into W@W, reskinned into Mw2, reskinned into Black Ops, Mw2 reskinned into Mw3. They just change/remove perks, reskin/replace guns, adjust/enhance killstreaks/ make some new maps and voila, a "new" game. and then they screw you with the DLC.

The Only Cod that mattered was the original, it's expansion pack United Offensive, and Cod 2 somewhat (I'm talking about the pc versions, first person shooters on console are not my thing at all)

Only games I vaguely look forward to now are Ghost Recon Future Soldier and Diablo 3. woohoo!

[SammiValentine]

TBH always found RTCW and ET better than even the original COD and CODII.

I only talk of PC versions btw

[SammiValentine]

I suppose know one can remeber 6v6 on Base or Village on RTCW or 6v6 Goldursh or Oasis or Ice even on ET? :Z That was the shit

[dafame]

I have both MW3 and BF3, this isn't even a contest, MW3 is so much more enjoyable to play. BF3 is fun for a couple of hours then you realize just how crappy the gameplay is how much better everything is on MW3. I'm selling my BF3 because it just doesn't have good replay value, whereas MW3 you can play over and over. Plus the Survival mode is awesome!!!

Battlefield 3 is meant more for the PC version, If you're playing the xbox or ps3 version, yea, then I see why you think the play is crappy. The console versions are really watered down versions of the glorious PC version. Battlefield has always been a pc game that doesn't translate too well to consoles.

As far as Modern Warfare 3, Call of duty has been reskinning and recylcing it's game for 4 years now. Mw1 , reskinned into W@W, reskinned into Mw2, reskinned into Black Ops, Mw2 reskinned into Mw3. They just change/remove perks, reskin/replace guns, adjust/enhance killstreaks/ make some new maps and voila, a "new" game. and then they screw you with the DLC.

The Only Cod that mattered was the original, it's expansion pack United Offensive, and Cod 2 somewhat (I'm talking about the pc versions, first person shooters on console are not my thing at all)

Only games I vaguely look forward to now are Ghost Recon Future Soldier and Diablo 3. woohoo!

Gotta disagree with the part about "doesn't translate well to console". Being that I have both versions I can tell you that the difference is in scale.

Because the PC version has 64 players the maps are ENORMOUS and while they are still HUGE on console they have been scaled down to suite 24 players and Dice did a very nice job with this. So much so that although the battle doesn't seem quite as massive on console as it does on PC, I can say that it's close enough that I actually enjoy playing the console version more (this also has to do with the fact that I prefer the feel of a controller as apposed to a mouse).

Scaled down yes, but watered down? I don't see it.

[Norma]

I suppose know one can remeber 6v6 on Base or Village on RTCW or 6v6 Goldursh or Oasis or Ice even on ET? :Z That was the shit

Definitely remember those. Goldrush is a classic. Sammi, did you like ETQW?

I thought it was a good attempt, but only lasted a few months.

As far as first person shooters, I only do pc versions as well. Console is good for 3rd person, side scrollers and little kiddie games. lol

Games like Silent Hill , Resident Evil, Grand Theft Auto, definitely are good on console. And the call of duty, ET, battlefield are better on pc.

[SammiValentine]

Definitely remember those. Goldrush is a classic. Sammi, did you like ETQW?

I thought it was a good attempt, but only lasted a few months.

As far as first person shooters, I only do pc versions as well. Console is good for 3rd person, side scrollers and little kiddie games. lol

Games like Silent Hill , Resident Evil, Grand Theft Auto, definitely are good on console. And the call of duty, ET, battlefield are better on pc.

yea am oldschool FPS... i briefly tried ET QW but that was during a period I didnt really play anything (transition,being a bit mental and stuff...a friend persuaded me to get steam and LFD2 got me back into playing a bit as gaming was big big thing for me for looong time when i was younger. Since then messed round on quakelive(reliving q3 lol), blackops and TF2 )

i hated blackops but the silly TDM mode got so damn addictive -shooting people in the head!

Need a new PC before i can try MW3 or rage really though.. this ones fooked. x

[Norma]

Gotta disagree with the part about "doesn't translate well to console". Being that I have both versions I can tell you that the difference is in scale.

Because the PC version has 64 players the maps are ENORMOUS and while they are still HUGE on console they have been scaled down to suite 24 players and Dice did a very nice job with this. So much so that although the battle doesn't seem quite as massive on console as it does on PC, I can say that it's close enough that I actually enjoy playing the console version more (this also has to do with the fact that I prefer the feel of a controller as apposed to a mouse).

Scaled down yes, but watered down? I don't see it.

You prefer console, I prefer pc version.

"Watered down" means/includes "Scaled down". The graphics are scaled down, the options are scaled down, the map size and player count is scaled down. PS3/xbox version is made for 4-5 year old hardware(i.e. console), while the PC version is made for top of the line pcs NOW.

Definitely watered (scaled) down, and dumbed down for console kiddies.

[Merkurie]

ArmA2 and Red Orchestra for the PC are my favorites.
I used to play BF2 Reality Mod for a long while too.

[dafame]

You prefer console, I prefer pc version.

"Watered down" means/includes "Scaled down". The graphics are scaled down, the options are scaled down, the map size and player count is scaled down. PS3/xbox version is made for 4-5 year old hardware(i.e. console), while the PC version is made for top of the line pcs NOW.

Definitely watered (scaled) down, and dumbed down for console kiddies.

Again (in the words of a famous sexual harasser) "you're talking apples and oranges". The graphics not being as good on console goes without saying. But this applies to both MW3 and Battlefield3 so the statement would have made a little more sense if you had applied it to both but you didn't. That's gonna be the same for any game offered on both console and PC right?

If you wanna call it "watered down" as apposed to "scaled down" that's fine but again "apples and oranges". The comparison was between two different games not console vs. PC. If the goal was simply to state that you're a mature PC player..lol. I get it. But if you were comparing the two games it doesn't make sense because both of these games can be found on PC and console and Battlefield on console still have more player than MW3 on either console or PC so I really can't see your point.

Oh wait, it was that you're a "mature" PC player. Never mind.