GOP Endangers America's Future for Political Gain

[beandip]

It's worth it to stop "irresponsible spending." Doesn't that strike you as a bit irresponsible, given that Obama already offered to trim spending on government programs by $4,000,000,000,000.00 and was turned down because he want to increase revenues as well? You guys aren't really worried about spending, you're just slaves to an idiot-ology.

Proof? 4T? hahahahahahaha

Yea, pull FUTURE tax revenue forward to pay YESTERDAYS DEBT. Mindless fucking moron.

Well look what happened when Reagan tried that. It's easy to talk shit and "promise" things....

who promised to close Gitmo?

who promised to remove all troops from Iraq and Trash-can-istan

We have a nobel peace prize winner who OK's crossing international borders and assassinating US citizens if they are deemed a "threat". Nice.

You fucking people are mindless ideologues.

It's math, not politics.

Your household takes in $1000.00 a month....you pay out $1200.00 a month, what do you do? Do you take out a loan to pay the difference? No. You trim the fat.

There is no risk of defaulting because thankfully we DO take in enough to pay the interest on the debt now. FEDGOV and the shit-bag leech-fucks need to get a 33% hair cut, fast.

It's coming by hook or crook. Wouldn't want to be you, for sure.

But hey....continue to be assholes..."hope and change"......hahahahahahaha

[Faldur]

Just quoting you, spud.

Think you may have misread who made that "quote". But keep coming back sport, we'll keep a chair warm for ya.

[beandip]

Funny how no one can actually cite ANY cuts that Obama supposedly said to offered (4T) in a Whore house leak last week.....


LOL

Charles Krauthammer Accuses Press of 'Accepting Every Leak Out of the White House'

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppa....

Charles Krauthammer on Friday marvelously demonstrated just how in the pockets of Barack Obama America's news media are.

After claiming on PBS's "Inside Washington" that we now have a "completely compliant, pliant, supine press accepting every leak out of the White House," he silenced the entire panel by asking them to name one specific cut to entitlements the President has proposed (video follows with transcript and commentary):

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: [The President] talks a good game. “Oh, I’m prepared to do entitlements, I’m ready to do entitlements.” Not once has he ever enunciated in public - other than all these leaks which I don’t trust for half a second – one structural change in entitlements, and without that, everybody over the age of nine knows we are not going to get a handle on the debt. So let’s hear him say it in public once.

NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: So why is it when he offered the big deal, the $4 trillion deal…

GORDON PETERSON, HOST: The grand bargain.

TOTENBERG: …the grand bargain, Republicans backed away from it?

KRAUTHAMMER: When did he offer that?

TOTENBERG: He offered that last week.

KRAUTHAMMER: Where?

TOTENBERG: In, he did it, publicly and in negotiations.

KRAUTHAMMER: In your leaks? What’s in the $4 trillion?

TOTENBERG: But Charles.

KRAUTHAMMER: Give me a number. Explain to me what’s in it.

TOTENBERG: Why is it, in two, in matter of two days, Republicans backed away from that and said we don’t want it?

KRAUTHAMMER: You accept everything he says, a $4 trillion deal, if you don’t have a single item in it that you can enunciate.

TOTENBERG: Well, I’m not at the table. Perhaps you are, but I’m not.

KRAUTHAMMER: Well then how does he expect America to accept something in which he explains nothing?

TOTENBERG: He actually said I’m going to get heat from my own people.

Moments later when others on the panel continued with similar rhetoric concerning the President’s so-called plan to reduce entitlement spending, Krauthammer struck again:

KRAUTHAMMER: My colleagues are demonstrating a point I’ve been trying to make about how you have a completely compliant, pliant, supine press accepting every leak out of the White House. Tell me, we have been told, I’ve heard it again and again that the President’s prepared to do, to make cuts in entitlements. Name me one.

PETERSON: Charles, a complete and compliant supine press. I love that.

KRAUTHAMMER: Yeah.

PETERSON: Let’s move along.

KRAUTHAMMER: I’ve got, I’ve got other adjectives, but we’re short on time.

PETERSON: Yes, and we have to keep it on the air.

Once again, Krauthammer demonstrated a fabulous point.

For weeks the media have been telling Americans the President's big budget plan offered cuts in entitlements, but none of them can actually name what those cuts are.

Keep on suckin' Obama's ass you morons.

[Faldur]

Great post Beandip. And here Indiana shows the nation how its done..

[trish]

The GOP decides tax-breaks for corporate jets are well worth defaulting on our bills. It's all about priorities.

Taxes in the U.S. over the last ten years have been the lowest they've been for the last fifty. So how come those "job creators" weren't making jobs during the Bush administration? They're currently making record profits. Production rates are higher than ever. Laborers are producing more goods per worker than thought possible, yet have diminished wages and no benefits. What are the fucking "job creators" doing? Hiring lawyers, lobbyists and paying off GOPers to keep their loopholes, that's what they're doing.

[Faldur]

The GOP decides tax-breaks for corporate jets are well worth defaulting on our bills. It's all about priorities.

Heres where I think your wrong Trish, the conservatives don't want to see those hardworking people who build small jets punished as political pawns. You want to change that tax policy do it at a time when the country is working.

Now if you excuse me I need to see if Marvin has finished washing my Gulfstream II.

[trish]

It's not a tax break for people who make jets you idiot; it's a tax break for the corporate execs already own them. It's not about production. It's about privilege for the moneyed.

[Faldur]

It's not a tax break for people who make jets you idiot; it's a tax break for the corporate execs already own them. It's not about production. It's about privilege for the moneyed.

Ok, well I don't recall calling you an idiot and I don't think that was warranted. Debate can be civil, no matter your position.

According to the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), Congress seems to be “attacking” corporate jets. “That talk may appear to be good politics, but the reality is it could hurt one of the leading manufacturing industries in the U.S,” says GAMA spokeswoman Katie Pribyl.

[trish]

Hey, when you're argument is idiotic, you're an idiot.

[beandip]

No, ideologue idiots will always be idiots. Simple math does not roll well with politics. Let's talk math.

They eschew personal responsibility and only think group think, like hiippifried. Baked beyond all hope, a walking talking anus who stated three years ago here the CDS's were "no problem".

Now he and Trish are fucking whining about default. Two assholes cut from the same cloth.

Seems AIG is still on the hook for 7T. There fore through the machinations of Bernanke / Geithner... the taxpayers of the US are still on the hook for 7T. Again, you ASSHOLES, this will be future tax monies bought forward to pay for TODAY's bankster bail outs in QE-III

You fucking morons, how does it feel to be debt slaves?

But hey.... "hope and change" will work out....eventually... bake another fatty ASSHOLES.

I have absolutely no sympathy for you useless leechfuck shit-bags.