Kimber James: FREE PORN!

[LibertyHarkness]

but its not just someone watching a few clips is it .. we are talking about the blatant ripping off and mass uploading of stolen/pirated content ..dont be so stupid to think its not. if that was the case then no one would be bothered if it was just a few clips here and there ...

So if it just a few clips from each town in each county, in each country, kinda racks up eh Theft is theft, if some asshole joins your site to deliberately rip all the content to upload file sites then yeah thats Theft and yeh that is just as serious as stealing a car.. least cars are insured and you get your money back ...

[loveboof]

but its not just someone watching a few clips is it .. we are talking about the blatant ripping off and mass uploading of stolen/pirated content ..dont be so stupid to think its not. if that was the case then no one would be bothered if it was just a few clips here and there ...

So if it just a few clips from each town in each county, in each country, kinda racks up eh Theft is theft, if some asshole joins your site to deliberately rip all the content to upload file sites then yeah thats Theft and yeh that is just as serious as stealing a car.. least cars are insured and you get your money back ...

But most of the people you are so vehemently attacking are in fact the people who just watch the clips.

I am not denying that theft is involved, and that there should be a solution - but we're not talking about a commodity in the same sense as a car or food at a supermarket. What about a friend of that person who knowingly purchased a stolen tv coming round to watch something, are they guilty even if they too know it is stolen?

I understand that you're a porn star so want this to be cut and dry, but it is a difficult issue. Millionaire rockstars suing kids is not a solution...

[SirCumsAlot]

kimber needs to learn how to cum

[bartholomeus]

The main problem is signing up.... i don't think anyone mentioned it but if you pay 30$ per site for only one model how much content will you get?

Yet if you want variety, and its obvious no one wants to be married to a specific porn material, then you will want to sing up for other sites. So how many sites can the common consumer afford at $30/month?

There needs to be more sites like bang bros which mesh together many different sites for a reasonable price. As far as i know the only one that has this and with trans porn is reality kings, but its only one site in their network (not sure if yum bundles their sites)....

If there was more sites with gg porn and more trans porn material of high quality like BB and RK then i think more people would sign up.

The problem is that now a days every model wants to make their own member site. I remember about 15 years ago this was not prevalent, so it was mostly member sites. Now girls want to make their own profit because its perceived as being more profitable than shooting for a member site like say bobs. The problem is that now so many girls do it that the consumer is left with few options, and the TOTAL profit of the industry will start getting divided into all the member sites and these new entrepreneurs. This forces everyone to try to maximize their bottom line by cutting their losses (as piracy) and the consumer to look out for his bottom line which is free porn if they want variety ....

If you obsess over one model then yes you will want to sign up, but if you get bored of the same girls always what option do you have? Girls want independent model member sites that are profitable and get pissed at the consumer who would not pay for their site so goes and gets the content in an illicit manner.

Most consumers will not dish out ~$100 monthly in member sites. So this business model is not very profitable if we consider that the consumer has a finite amount of disposable income that he can direct towards porn.

This is why sites like RK, BB, and other 'networks' are fine despite much piracy because their model is like comparing Walmart to a mom & pops shop.

The entrepreneurs need to come up with different ways of making money instead of every single girl making a member site. Member sites need to be more like BB and RK, to get their the costumer base they want; that is people who won't pay. If for 30$ to 50$ a month you can get high quality material with gg, and ts perhaps even gay, and constant updates then the free porn consumer base will choose if they want crappy streaming over HD quality porn for a reasonable monthly price. More consumers sign up, and now you are making money from a base which you would not be able to tap before.

Given there will always be those who will not pay, but minimizing the gap should increase profit..

[kaiser1one]

Exactly people complain about the quality and productions of porn now..if people paid more the productions and quality would go up.

Now thats a damn lie and you know it.

[SirCumsAlot]

Now thats a damn lie and you know it.

[dgs925]

This sums it up pretty well.

[GroobySteven]

but we're not talking about a commodity in the same sense as a car or food at a supermarket.

That argument doesn't stand up whatsoever. It is exactly the same, the same processes of manufacture and investment have went into that commodity and X amount need to sell, to recoup that investment.

If that's the basis of your argument for piracy, then it's failed. Yes there are many gray areas as in your example of somebody watching a stolen TV at a friends house but the simple fact is, if it's been taken from the owner, without their consent it's stolen and anybody viewing this on tubes or filelockers IS aware of this.

[GroobySteven]

The main problem is signing up.... i don't think anyone mentioned it but if you pay 30$ per site for only one model how much content will you get?

I thought on the SMC network you could signup to all the girls sites for $30-$35??

[GroobySteven]

This sums it up pretty well.

Pathetic argument - you are worthless.