Tired of seeing fat, ugly, out of shape, average men in ts porn.

[igotmacedbymimi:(]

Could just be my opinion. But why cant the porn producers actually pay for some decent male talent as well?

A lot of the girls are using 'fans'. A lot of the production companies are using the same unattractive men.

This is the porn industry, not real life, everything is just a made up fantasy. Behind the porn set is some seedy little cameraman and another equally seedy producer on a backstreet appartment with a makeshift set.

But why not make it more polished? Instead of the weedy little guy who you get for free or even pays the ts or porn company a hundred bucks, why not actually pay some huge buff hung dude a thousand bucks to get in on with a real hottie ts?

Come on, imagine the chemistry if they both dig each other and the guy really wants to go at her, think how much better it will be on camera surely for the production and also the viewers, surely worth the extra money?

Ok, i understand that maybe the problem is finding these guys, but again, this is porn, its not real, why not hire some of the most buff and hung gay pornstars to feature with the ts. If the guys pop a few pills they will be bursting to go, they probably wont even need to anyway! The ts are sure as hell going to enjoy it.

If you ever watch gay porn and the hot guys in it compared to straight porn (although that isnt too bad), ts porn has got to be the worst for male talent.

Make an investment, if the hot hung gay dudes come at a price, its worth it because you will pay a bit more in order to get a much better cut and lots more footage!

[BellaBellucci]

Two words: stunt dick. Who really cares about the guy?

~BB~

[theone1982]

Well, Christian is pretty buff, but he's basically in every scene that doesn't involve Tom Moore. As long as the guy can get hard and stay hard and the girl is at least marginally interested in him, that's all I really care about regarding the guy in porn. I hate it when they can't get completely hard, it's like they're trying to unlock a doorknob with a piece of spaghetti.

[igotmacedbymimi:(]

Two words: stunt dick. Who really cares about the guy?

~BB~

You see, i think this is the problem with ts porn. 'Stunt dick' meaning little weedy unattractive man who is hired free of charge or makes a donation for having the 'privallidge' of being in the porn movie.

Then it becomes rough, unpolished porn.

Granted, most viewers of ts porn do not look at the guys either, i am probably in the minority because i also enjoy gay and straight porn as well. But i think that if there was a very attractive guy, such as a top american male gay pornstar featured alongside a top ts pornstar. Surely the big budget production companies could organise this?

It works in favour for a few reasons.

1. The ts will go crazy for the guy. Let's not make out that its just porn and there is no attraction, you put a hot hung stud infront of a horny ts and her friends in a nightclub and they will perv all night long! So why not pair them up on the porn set instead?

2. The chemistry will be ten times greater.

3. Ts rock hard. Turned on, big cum shot.

4. Set runs real smooth, loads more footage captured, loads more photos taken because everything is more real, which means a lot more final product for the production company to put out.

Instead, you can see that there is no attraction at all, both parties are just going through the motions in most cases, particularly brazilian ts.

When it is ts on girl, ussually pretty hot girls are used. So why can the ts porn industry not just hire some buff gay pornstars to rattle up the ts. Make it more exciting?

[GroobySteven]

It always amazes me how much attention one or two people who claim to be into transsexuals put on the male performers.

Getting "buff gay pornstars" would just look like that, "buff gay pornstars" where having relatively normal, reasonably in-shape guys keeps a level of realism about it and can be just as hot. As much as I've tried to have Christian wear an afro wig and a false nose, the only reason people complain about him is that he is ubiquitous, apart from that he's a great performer, a nice guy AND I get models specifically wanting to work with him, again and again - and they get good scenes.

I don't see any problem with the male performers in the scenes, maybe you are looking at the males, just a little too hard?








[img][/img]

[GroobySteven]

More

[f1manoz]

I could care less what the man looks like. You're looking in the wrong place!

[Lysandros]

Yep .. I don't prefer TM too
but nevertheless many TS models have never acted better than with him.

Christian made & makes a good job,
the early Kimber James precum clips are unthinkable without him.

btw .. all camera men should be concentrated on the actiing shemale,
I don't like the many seconds only actor's face is visible.


lys


@ seanchai

Any chance to watch blonde Marylyn again on grooby.
I'm missing M. for years.

[GroobySteven]

@ seanchai

Any chance to watch blonde Marylyn again on grooby.
I'm missing M. for years.

I have no idea where she is - have you seen her advertising anywhere?

[TJ347]

It always amazes me how much attention one or two people who claim to be into transsexuals put on the male performers.

It shouldn't amaze you in the least, as this has been talked about for years. If enough male viewers imagine themselves to be fit and attractive, even if they're in fact neither of these things, you're going to eventually hear complaints when the male talent doesn't fit the same description in their minds. I figure this goes back to the belief that many men need to be able to imagine themselves participating in a scene in order for it to "work" for them... I know that this is important for me.

However, these days I'm just happy when the guy can get a sufficient erection to actually penetrate the girl. In that area, Tom and Christian do the job, and if I get tired enough of seeing their faces there's always the Brazilian flicks, which have a greater variety of male talent. Anyway, most important to me is that the girls earn their money for a scene, so if some limp-dicked dude is the chosen cocksman (particularly for a girl I'm really into), I'm going to be disappointed the same as if I'd watched a scene with the girl handling business solo. It has nothing to do with focusing on the male talent to any degree, but rather on what I need as an individual to "get off", so to speak, and what I need is to see some serious fucking when I waste money on porn. With a comment such as "too much attention being paid to male performers", you insult a customer who has spoken out regarding what he wants for his money. Maybe you don't agree, but what you, me and the OP need to deem a scene "hot" are not going to be quite the same, if they are the same at all.