I wonder...

[SirCumsAlot]

You know, I've been wondering as of lately how many of these tgirls models and pornstars are actually really real tgirls and not being tgirls just to make money. I've been addicted to porn since I was a little kid, discovered tgirl porn in my mid teens, I'm now 23 and still love porn and sex, and I've notice lately that there are so, so many tgirl models and escorts and pornstarts out there, I've been wondering how many are actually tgirls because they feel they should be female but born in a wrong body, compared to how many are just in it for the hustle and money. Of course there been cases such as Kayla Coxx, Lawler, plus I know a friend personaly I meet who tried to be a tgirl, but decided to just stay a boy and but still crossdresses every now and then.

You would think that people born as male but feel they should be female would be a rarity, but nowadays you can find so many tons and tons of tgirls out there online that I'm starting to think some tgirls are in it just for a trend rather than a lifestyle.

[dreamon]

in before the shitstorm

[amberskyi]

i really feel like i should of been born a moose

[Ryz]

i really feel like i should of been born a moose

Me too, I found this amazing surgeon that can implant antlers into my head and give me a tail. I can't wait

[Nivek]

With beauties like Sarina Valentina, Bailey Jay, and Even Kimber James (Hell yes still) just to name a few.. I could care less if they were in it for the money, and God Bless em if they were. Jesus, they look a hell of a lot hotter than most ggs i see everyday. and i can only imagine that looking as sweet as they do doesnt come cheap.

[SirCumsAlot]

haha better be careful! Ya'll may be reborn as a moose if you believe in reincarnation

[Nivek]

moose are like humpless camels without antlers

[iamdrgonzo]

This may have something to do with it:


Gender-bender chemicals 'putting everyone at risk'
By David Derbyshire
Last updated at 11:14 AM on 25th March 2010


Millions of people have been contaminated with potentially dangerous gender-bending chemicals from food packaging, drinks cans and baby bottles, a study shows.

Researchers say the general public is 'ubiquitously' exposed to bisphenol A (BPA) - a man-made chemical linked to breast cancer, fertility problems and birth defects.

The chemical, which mimics the female sex hormone oestrogen, was found at detectable levels in most pregnant women, teenagers and children.
Although the levels are within the official safety guidelines, anti-chemical campaigners say there is worrying evidence that BPA is harmful at low levels.

They accused government agencies around the world of ignoring the mounting evidence against BPA - and putting health at risk.
BPA is used to make linings of food and drink cans. It is also found in plastic bottles, CD cases, plastic knives and forks and dental sealants. Although some animal studies have shown it is safe, others link it to breast cancer, liver damage, obesity, diabetes and fertility problems in animals. Studies have also linked it to heart disease in women.

Canada is so concerned at the threat it has banned BPA from babies' bottles.
However, the Food Standards Agency insists that exposure levels in Britain are safe.
The new study, published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, analysed more than 80 studies which measured concentrations of BPA in bodily fluids.

After looking at thousands of people in Europe, China, Korea, Japan and America, the studies showed that traces of the chemical were 'routinely' found in blood, breast milk and urine.

'These studies overwhelmingly detected BPA in individuals including adults, adolescents and children,' said lead author Dr Laura Vandenberg, of Tufts Universityin Massachusetts. One study of BPA found traces in 591 out of 599 German children.

Another study of 300 pregnant women found it in the blood of 84 per cent of women and 40 per cent of their foetuses. Although levels were low, the authors point to evidence from animal studies that BPA can cause effects at concentrations below the official safe dose. However, regulatory bodies - including the European Food Safety Authority - appear to have ignored the 80 studies that measure actual levels of BPA in favour of two 'toxicokinetic' studies that rely on estimated levels of exposure to work out what happens to toxic chemicals in the body.

The review says these two studies are flawed and unreliable.
'In stark contrast, toxicokinetic studies propose that humans are not internally exposed to BPA,' the authors said. 'Some regulatory authorities have relied solely on only these toxicokinetic models in their risk assessments.' Elizabeth Salter-Green, of the campaigning group CHEM Trust, said: 'This is overwhelming evidence that BPA is now found as a widespread contaminant in people, including pregnant mothers and their unborn children.

'Weighing up all the current studies on BPA and its toxicity and exposure, CHEM Trust calls for precautionary action to eliminate exposure to BPA where possible. 'When there are ongoing doubts as to the safety of a chemical, it should be industry, not the unborn child, that bears the burden of those doubts.'



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...ting-risk.html

[SirCumsAlot]

With beauties like Sarina Valentina, Bailey Jay, and Even Kimber James (Hell yes still) just to name a few.. I could care less if they were in it for the money, and God Bless em if they were. Jesus, they look a hell of a lot hotter than most ggs i see everyday. and i can only imagine that looking as sweet as they do doesnt come cheap.

Yeah I know where you coming from, I feel the same. I'm bi so I'll date cute fem looking boys, beautiful tgirls or a regular gg, but Im a huge fan of tgirls so it don't matter much to me either if they in it for hustle or not, but I just been wondering out of curiosity you know. Just something that hit me this morning

[Nivek]

i think thats a pretty good thing to ponder. DrGonzo thats an interesting post, though i think the things we dont know about being put in our food and water can explain alot more than hormonal bending.