Black trannies stop lying!

[CaptainPlanet]

No different then all these Mexican chicas doing it too. "Brazilian and Thai" "Spanish and German" Mexican and Japanese" Then there all straight from Guadalajara! Exotic shit sells! They just follow the trend, business is business, they don't have to be honest in there eyes.

[Yvonne183]

I am part Eskimo,, my family comes from the very north of the Yukon where the Eskimos have pink hair.

[LaCosa]

I think black trannies do this for rates. They know the racism in their community, so they appeal to the market by being seen as less 'harmful,' hence less black, by mixing. There are many times I see a Tranny that state that they are half, "Indian" or "Cuban" or whatever non black only to see a black thug in a wig or a black guy with a bad weave job with nappy roots and to much lip gloss. But then again, the Hispanic ones do this too. They claim to be either European, or in some cases mixed with white. They might pass for white in Spain or Brazil but not in the United States. A dye job, color contacts, and not liking blacks does not make you white! Again, it's about business, the reason why they do it is because of the overt underhanded racism in the transsexual-escort community. I'm as white as they come, and I've heard all kind of racism and have racist family member that are either neo nazis or KKK, but even my jaw drops at some of the things I hear White or Hispanic trannies say about blacks..Even the so-called mixed black trannies talk bad shit about blacks too lol the racism in the tranny-escort community is crazy insane....Every-time I call up one, the first thing I say is that I'm white and their tone begins to change.I just laugh, low ball, and tap that ass... becasue I do the same thing any guy would do black or white, I just negotiate and lowball until they pay my rate....Side note to all of the white guys, HAVE YOUR OWN RATE THAT YOU WILL NOT GO PASS.... White guys who pay top dollars are giving other whites like myself a bad name for being suckers and paying $300 or whatever for 15 min of ass...I'm singling out my own race because I hear all of the time that "white guys pay what we say while blacks want to pay less." I'm not trying to be racist, but come on, if your white you are already in and guaranteed to tap that ass, just negotiate a lil bit and you can come out with the price you are willing to pay... I was with one tranny who was hispanic and her rate was 200$ probably becasue I was White, so I spent 10 min with her on the phone and egged her own talking about how bad blacks are, How blacks lowball and never want to pay their rate, how they are this and how they are that and whatnot I even told her that she looked like she was from England or some Northern European country and the next thing you know, she agreed to see me for $70, that is $10 more then my rate but, it was still good ass...Even though I have black friends and can't stand racist or Bigot people (but love tapping some racist/bigot tranny ass), while I was on the phone with her, my black friend was telling me what to say to her.... Also,its not only trannies, Hispanic males claim to be White as Well...LOL they come from Cuba and say they have no Black in them or that they are not black and look like Sammy Sosa. ..Why is it you don't see white trannies bending over backwards claiming that they are part black or hispanic? I'm not saying be proud of your race because many mixed or other trannies or not, but atleast be honest about it...there is a market for black trannies!

At bold. There is a lot of colorism in the Black-American community, this is true.

I'm racially biracial mulatto and ethnically Black-American. Yes, Black-American or what some prefer to term today as "African-American" is a bona fide ethnicity. As much an ethnicity as being Puerto Rican.

So, I know Black-America like I know the back of my hand. And what makes you think darker skinned Black-American females are "misunderstood" but biracial mulattas and "light skinned" Black-American women are just hostile towards those darker than them? You do realize light-skinned females have been physically attacked (usually in grade school or high school) by mobs or darker black girls?

Certainly there are plenty of charitable dark skin Black-American women. But darker skinned Black-Americans can be as malicious and antagonistic towards biracials or light skinned "blacks" as those lighter than them can be towards them.

[LaCosa]

As for phenotype and DNA results it's more complicated that saying DNA shows person X is mixed-race. The human genome has genes shared with other organic life forms including fruit.

The term "gene" might not be around much longer anyways because biologist now know their understanding of "genes" (a concept that predates the discovery of DNA) is not sharp enough. Some want to redefine or sharpen the term and others want to get rid of it.

Ever since the late 1990's a complimentary area of study called "Protieoms" has emerged. The Human being has roughly 20,000 genes about 96% or so we have no idea of what they do. The proteins (collectively term protieom) in the human person approximate around 100,000 possibly, and we still don't know a lot about any of this.

Whats more a black person and a white person are more genetically similar than two black people are to each other. That alone cast a shadow on using DNA results to define race. What DNA results do is show a person has genes in their personal genome (the collectivity of their genes) that they inherited, and that said genes predominate in certain regions of the earth (consequently) among certain ethnic and "racial" groups. It's a matter of inference.

But we have dominate and recessive genes in us. The dominate one are the ones that are given expression (disease, behavior, physical looks). However, you have situations like incomplete dominance, where a red flower crossing gametes with a white flower will produce a pink offspring. We see this in cases like the light brown skin Halle Berry who is a mulatta. It's also possible for an offspring to have mostly all their dominate genes from one parent (offspring take half their genes from each parent).

Certain phenotypic traits be it disease (e.g. sickle cell) or physical looks (Nordic looks) are sociologically "racial" but not necessarily biologically "racial" per se. It has to do with natural selection and geographical isolation. At least that is likely the current explanation, but shit changes so often in the biological science who knows what the hell will be theorized (theories explain "laws" although aside from physics and chemistry's impact on organisms, there are no real laws in biology given evolution) tomorrow.

In short if people in Chicago only mated with each other over hundreds or thousands of years, keeping their genetic pool relatively isolated from all the rest of North and South America, due to selection (natural selection) and geography we can surmise certain phenotypic traits (disease and physical looks) will predominate among those Chicagoans. This will give the impression or taxonomical appearance of "race."

[phobun]

I get so tired of all these black trannies posting ads on backpage claiming theyre mixed or hispanic! Its time to stop the fake adverting most of us know youre not mixed or hispanic and its kinda sad. Do you think this is going to bring you more business or something?

A lot of people in the US have mixed ancestry. It might be true that they are black race with hispanic or mixed ethnicity.

PM natina/tsbrenda for more information.

[Merkurie]

LaCosta is right, Black American is an ethnic group, not a "race" even though we short cut and talk about white and black races. But that idea is deeply flawed.

Black Americans are an ethnic group like any other, with a different admixtures than any of the many African ethnicities. Generally Black Americans don't look like Africans no matter what complexion, you can almost always spot an African from a North or South American.

Depending on their background Black Americans tend to be a mixture of West African, Scottish, Irish, English and Choctaw and Cherokee. Some have more French and Spanish, some German. Some other native tribes and some less. And the African genes are mixed in Black Americans in ways that are probably different than Africans from the continent.

Black Americans are an "American" people (geographically and culturally), like Mexicans, Brazilians and Puerto Ricans, "whites" and anyone else who has deep roots in the New World. I doubt anyone who has New World ancestry that goes back before 1900 have has pure bloodlines.

[peggygee]

Elated to be a strong, proud Black woman.

[LaCosa]

LaCosta is right, Black American is an ethnic group, not a "race" even though we short cut and talk about white and black races. But that idea is deeply flawed.

Black Americans are an ethnic group like any other, with a different admixtures than any of the many African ethnicities. Generally Black Americans don't look like Africans no matter what complexion, you can almost always spot an African from a North or South American.

Depending on their background Black Americans tend to be a mixture of West African, Scottish, Irish, English and Choctaw and Cherokee. Some have more French and Spanish, some German. Some other native tribes and some less. And the African genes are mixed in Black Americans in ways that are probably different than Africans from the continent.

Well... I wasn't trying to say all that - excepted that Black-Americans are an ethnic group.

Many Black-Americans with two "black" parents (some are lighter than me) show a clear "admixture."

I have to put some of these words in quotation marks because I'm not sure these are clear biological truisms about separate races among humans but logical sociological concepts of separate races we have.

Most biologists and anthropologist say there is only one race among modern humans today. This makes sense to me given what limited things I know about biology and genetics (which is not much - but more than the average Joe walking down the street). But it should be pointed out the concept of "race" falls under the biological specialty of taxonomy and taxonomy is really more an art than it is a science.

A greater genetic gap in the descent (with modification) of organisms than race is species. And there are organisms and animals that are two separate species but visually look more similar (at least to us humans) to each other than black and white people. That should be suggestive of some of the artistic license taken in taxonomical assignment.

As for Africa it is a diverse continent. Africans are white (like the Berbers) and other phenotypes. Supposedly the oldest black ethnic group on the African continent is not all that "black" in hue. They have the brown complexion of Denzel Washington. I believe they are located along the Southeast portion of Africa. But many Black-Americans descend from the black African ethnic Fulani (among many other black African ethnic groups). You can google them up. They often tend to have a brown complexion like that of Denzel Washington too. Genetic markers among the Fulani in Africa suggest they have European ancestry as well. Some have speculated the ancient Romans had trade interaction with them.

My main point was that race is a sociological reality and truism but not a biological one - at least among modern humans (there supposedly once were more than one race among humans, and some animal species apparently have more than one race among them). Given that, there are specific cultural notions of what is "black" or "white" in certain countries and or cultures (and "mixed race" is equally a sociological construct and a biological oxymoron). In Brazil for example, "white" has as wide a range of phenotypes (Reverend Wright - Obama's past controversial pastor - would be considered white in Brazil, I wouldn't even though one of my parents is white) as "black" has in the United States. No one in Brazil would consider light ass Maria Carey as "black" - nor would they anywhere in Latin America. But the United States has a history of hypodecent (One Drop Rule).

I would, however, agree with you that the mean (average) "admixture" among the Black-American population is higher than it is among most black African ethnicities in Africa. Without a doubt there was sexual contact between the Amerindians, blacks, and whites. But this can be exaggerated at times. Perhaps not among U.S. "Indians" that often are whiter (or blacker) than many if not most mestizos throughout Mexico and Latin America. But the Amerindians were pushed to the margins by the time many of my German ancestors migrated to Milwaukee and Wisconsin. During the late 1800's the City of Milwaukee was made up primarily of European immigrants (literally). Many of them refused to intermarry among one another let alone among blacks (almost non-existent in much of the North at that time) and Amerindians. However, when Wisconsin was under French control the mestizo population was quite large with many Frenchman having Amerindian wives. And of course it is widely known the French in Louisiana sexually joined with the blacks and Amerindians in that region to create "mixed-race" peoples in significant numbers.

Ethnicity has more to do with cultural traits like language, religion, shared common history etc.

And due to a combination or racial segregation and the One Drop Rule this is why so many biracial mulattoes in the U.S. are ethnically Black-American. You can have several ethnicities within a nation or nationality of people.

For example, Black-Americans nationality is "American" (or United Statesian to be more accurate) and their ethnicity is Black-American. In Brazil a Brazilian's nationality is Brazilian (they are Americans as members of the continent(s)) and aside from the Amerindians (e,g., Tupi) and Asians I don't think the whites, mulattoes, morenos, and blacks share a separate ethnicity. Class more than race has separated Brazilians. Although, admittedly, that has overlapped to some extent.



Sorry for the long post.

[SirCumsAlot]

A lot of people in the US have mixed ancestry. It might be true that they are black race with hispanic or mixed ethnicity.

Oh no, I know what the OP is talking about! They(the black trannies) would post a pic up on backpage or wherever, claiming they're latin, asian, or mix, then when you see them, you be like, WTF! Nothing like what I saw online! I got fooled twice and that was it. Usually I can tell when somebody post a false add, but in one of them scenarios I was hoping "she" was really asian, but of course she wasn't. I stayed though only because "she" was still cute. It's pretty sad how common that is for the black race to use false pics/ads

[LaCosa]

Oh no, I know what the OP is talking about! They(the black trannies) would post a pic up on backpage or wherever, claiming they're latin, asian, or mix, then when you see them, you be like, WTF! Nothing like what I saw online! I got fooled twice and that was it. Usually I can tell when somebody post a false add, but in one of them scenarios I was hoping "she" was really asian, but of course she wasn't. I stayed though only because "she" was still cute. It's pretty sad how common that is for the black race to use false pics/ads

In the USA many like to depict Black-American males as these overall failures and bad people and contrast them to the Black-American woman who supposedly does no wrong and knows everything.

Both perceptions - popularly promoted in the media - draw from statistical realities (e.g., incarceration, homicide, educational attainment etc.). But cultural realities are a bit more nuanced I think.

I personally hold a better opinion in general of Black-American males than Black-American females. By and large I've found Black-American females to be self-centered, obnoxious, loud, mean or even cruel, conniving people.

From my experience most (over 50% but in this case well over that - probably 95% to 99%) Black-American females are reared being indoctrinated they can spin, connive, as much as they want and in fact are morally responsible to do just that.

I've never paid for transsexual escorts and never have even slept with a transsexual. I suspect that if black transsexuals intentional deceive so many people it derives from this notion they are morally commanded, justified to "hustle" and sucker people because they are "black women." I put that in quote marks because they still have XY chromosomes.

All women - or transsexuals - hustle in the sex trade and try to seduce or manipulate their trick/clients mind. Hell, strippers do that. And some may even airbrush their photos. But deceiving tricks/clients about your race is something that leads many men to build resentments. That's just human emotions and responses. If 10 white men out of 100 white men slapped a black woman across her face she likely would build resentments against white males.

Here's an example of awesome young man, a real class act. He's a Black-American. And make special note you'd likely never see a Black-American woman do similar in a million years. http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shu...urn=nfl-wp2127

Bears rookie J.T. Thomas takes young lady to eighth-grade dance

By MJD




As J.T. met a Bears fan in his hometown, Joslyn explained to him that she'd had a rough week because all of the boys she asked to the dance declined. Thomas melted.

"I hugged her and signed a few things and we talked for awhile and she cried a bit," Thomas recounted. "I gave her a hug and told her everything would work itself out."