Guys in this forum

[MrsKellyPierce]

Take a few moments ( if of course you're interested in accuracy ...ha ha ) and look at the posts where I went off on someone. They're few and far in between. It's never about thier physical appearence, or who they choose to fuck or not fuck, or thier race, or what they call themselves or what group they're in. It's almost never personal unless they hurl personal insults my way, and I NEVER initiate it. It's never adhominum..I'm a counter puncher with a long memory, but with luv in my heart !!!!!!!!

There's 2 people on HA I've crossed swords with , and I'll bet they both show up on this thread !! LOL

No....


A lot of guys come on here with good intentions until one of the girls corners them, and gets ugly. Eventually, they begin to fight back. Not everyone comes on here starting shit.

Most of you know I have been as nice as can be to most. However, there are a couple people that I just won't tolerate running their mouth to me. That has nothing to do with a fear of sexual orientation, as much as it does me just tiring of their bullshit.

Guys are jerks- since when is that a surprise at all?
Guys want to get laid without commitment- since when is that a surprise at all?
Guys don't want to be called gay- since when is that a surprise at all?
Ask any genetic girl from the age of 15 - 95 and they know all these things, yet it seems to be a mystery on this board.
I just find the judgment is silly. Ask GGs- guys try to fuck them without wanting to know them all the time. I don't think that male shallowness is endemic to their relationships with t-girls but rather a certain set of men who are sex addicts that keep chasing the next high.
Because so many of the girls are porn stars and escorts with videos and pictures of them online, this board is going to get more of the people who watch these videos, right? Doesn't that just make sense- porn stars are going to attract who like porn?
And I'm sorry but the reasoning here just throws me sometimes- for example- let's say out of a thousand sexual experiences you've had a total of four with a couple of TSs and TVs, does that make you "gayer" than a guy who dates ONLY TS who live as women but lets them pack his fudge and treat him like a prison bitch who just got traded for a pack of smokes (but its cool because he knows you're a woman even as you've got an erect several inch penis currently raiding his colon) ?
I mean it just seems silly and arbitrary to make these distinctions, yet I can't find a thread where a girl doesn't do it.
If you want to have your own definitions of conduct and activity, other people will want them too.
There just seems to be a noticeable lack of live and let live on this board...

But pornstars/escorts are hard to get unless you are flaunting money in their direction.....Never understood men who think pornstars/escorts are easy.

[BellaBellucci]

Darn editing- you could've had it with the "f*ing and dancing" smiley.

I don't know how to dance!

Thanks for your efforts to help knit a community out of these threads_- I know I can't be the only one who appreciates it.

Nothing but love, baby girl.

Oh, you mean...

I don't really get who's actually being talked about here.

That's kind of the point. I'm not going to name names because the guilty parties know who they are and I don't want anyone else to get butt-hurt. I just want everyone to stop terrorizing some of the girls here.

~BB~

[cheez]

But pornstars/escorts are hard to get unless you are flaunting money in their direction.....Never understood men who think pornstars/escorts are easy.

but we live in a different age now- people get a false sense of intimacy based on their online conversations- I believe I read in a recent sex survey that people who start online chat relationships are 50% more likely to have sex on their first meeting (should they actually meet). Simply because there's a feeling that you already "know" the person.
I think that's part of what comes into play as well at least on the fan's side of things.

[amberskyi]

but we live in a different age now- people get a false sense of intimacy based on their online conversations- I believe I read in a recent sex survey that people who start online chat relationships are 50% more likely to have sex on their first meeting (should they actually meet). Simply because there's a feeling that you already "know" the person.
I think that's part of what comes into play as well at least on the fan's side of things.

i think you touched on something here

[Jolt711ml]

Who cares what these niggas say!

[GrimFusion]

but we live in a different age now- people get a false sense of intimacy based on their online conversations- I believe I read in a recent sex survey that people who start online chat relationships are 50% more likely to have sex on their first meeting (should they actually meet). Simply because there's a feeling that you already "know" the person.
I think that's part of what comes into play as well at least on the fan's side of things.

That's one reason why I don't go out of my way to meet people from the internet. The net isn't an excuse to skip the "getting to know you" or "are you a psycho?" phase.

[dogsandcats]

i think you touched on something here

that's what she said

But yeah he is right. Also, the anonymity of the internet does help people relax and get their guard down quicker.

[Saffron]

...are morons. Enough said.

[rockabilly]

...are morons. Enough said.

Rilly ... u thynk so?

[BellaBellucci]

...are morons. Enough said.

Ouch. So not helpful.

~BB~