Public Notice regarding the unauthorized use of my Intellectual Property

[slinky]

http://newyork.craigslist.org/que/cas/1993280400.html

[Jericho]

more of yours?

[lisaparadise]

[QUOTE=slinky;807786]http://newyork.craigslist.org/que/cas/1993280400.html[/QUOTEwho do you shoot for?are you a pro or somebody who just likes to take pix of tgirls

[Jericho]

I'm thinking that's not the point...

[lisaparadise]

I'm thinking that's not the point...

well im saying that is the point buddy if a model gets her pix taken without signing a model release then she has every right to those pix period.

[Jericho]

Well, thankfully, what you say, and the law, are two different things.
You wanna get paid for your work, why shouldn't Slinky?

[slinky]

well im saying that is the point buddy if a model gets her pix taken without signing a model release then she has every right to those pix period.

You don't have a fucking clue about what you are talking about.

[slinky]

who do you shoot for?are you a pro or somebody who just likes to take pix of tgirls

I own a production company for mostly adult content.

[AmyDaly]

I can tell you right now, if you take my picture in public that I will use it any ways I please. So better put a watermark on it because its going on the candid section of my site if I want to use it.

[slinky]

Well, thankfully, what you say, and the law, are two different things.
You wanna get paid for your work, why shouldn't Slinky?

As you'll note, for most of the items I'm not even asking for money unless the work is being used commercially (even though under the law i am entitled to do so). But I see NO excuse to use my work commercially without even asking for permission to do so.

But Jericho, as an example, how would you feel if you put up a photo on Facebook and linked to the subject. The subject removes the link (which would be fine if they did not like the pic), but then copies the pic and puts it up on her own page, giving no credit, as if it were her photo?