Results 11 to 20 of 23
-
06-06-2010 #11Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Cali
- Posts
- 846
your reading to hard maybe, he only stated the obvious
Originally Posted by TheGuard
It's hard to take anything you say seriously because right next to your words Mario is sucking off Princess Peach.
-
06-06-2010 #12Professional Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- 48 contiguous states
- Posts
- 1,793
This has been beat to death in the old forum. Like I said then, if there's some difference in TSes that make them tend to catch more diseases people need to tell us. I hate so much to see a scene with a GG a guy and a TS and it's all bareback until the TS gets involved. And you people who have porn morals make me laugh!
"I don't see it that way. I see it as a complete and total betrayal of my testicles!"
-
06-06-2010 #13Professional Poster
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Over The Hills and Far Away
- Posts
- 1,083
porn morals or empathy for another human being?
C'est La Vie!
-
06-06-2010 #14Silver Poster
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Queens, N.Y.
- Posts
- 3,899
Actually there is a vast difference between BBBJ and unprotected anal sex.
-
06-06-2010 #15Professional Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- 48 contiguous states
- Posts
- 1,793
What empathy? Please wear a condom while you fuck those fifteen guys and get sodomized while wearing a habit!
Is this right wing extremist porn (sin with a heart)? You watch porn made by companies called Devil's films etc., but you want them to be sweet! I get it--- it's Green porn. Pa-lease! It's fucking porn!
"I don't see it that way. I see it as a complete and total betrayal of my testicles!"
-
06-06-2010 #16Professional Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- 48 contiguous states
- Posts
- 1,793
The point is there seems to be a difference between unprotected anal sex with a GG which is rampant, and unprotected anal sex with a TS. Originally Posted by fred41
"I don't see it that way. I see it as a complete and total betrayal of my testicles!"
-
06-06-2010 #17Silver Poster
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Queens, N.Y.
- Posts
- 3,899
Because statistically there IS a difference. Originally Posted by sucka4chix
-
06-06-2010 #18Professional Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- 48 contiguous states
- Posts
- 1,793
So do your PSA, and tell us what the difference is, statistically. Maybe TS porn should be banned, if they are carriers of diseases at a significantly higher rate than everyone else. Give me the ammo and I'll call my congressman. Originally Posted by fred41
"I don't see it that way. I see it as a complete and total betrayal of my testicles!"
-
06-06-2010 #19Professional Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 1,301
the fantasy of bareback is hot but the reality is not. it can be dangerous. i don't mind them all being safe.
-
06-06-2010 #20Senior Member Platinum Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Erewhon
- Posts
- 24,238
re bareback oral and HIV... very very low risk according to medical profession. You'd have to have major lesions in mouth. Anal unprotected = Very High risk. I think that is the answer, isn't it. HIV may not kill anymore for certain but it does lower life expectancy and means a lifetime of expensive and unplesaant medication
Reply With QuoteSimilar Threads
-
I have a question for the American ladies in porn
By AverageJob in forum General DiscussionReplies: 10Last Post: 05-03-2016, 07:23 PM -
Am I the dirtiest TS in American porn?
By tsmandy in forum General DiscussionReplies: 302Last Post: 08-07-2014, 12:24 AM -
Can someone post an american list of porn comp...
By MrsKellyPierce in forum General DiscussionReplies: 12Last Post: 08-08-2008, 04:48 AM -
The most badly missing scene in TS porn...?
By rvince in forum General DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 05-29-2007, 03:00 PM -
Why is a lot of S. American TS Porn shot outside?
By Person in forum General DiscussionReplies: 15Last Post: 12-20-2006, 02:37 PM
