Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 345678910 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 98
  1. #71
    Junior Poster
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    397

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben View Post
    Rand Paul introduces ‘fetal personhood’ bill to outlaw abortion:

    Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) on Friday introduced so-called “fetal personhood” legislation that would completely outlaw abortion in the United States.
    The Life at Conception Act would declare that human life began at conception, providing fertilized eggs with the same legal status as born persons.

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/1...tlaw-abortion/
    Rand Paul is full of shit. Most Americans don't believe in personhood. More people believe in restricting abortions than personhood. It is an attempt by pro-lifers to circumvent Roe v. Wade. Personhood sounds a lot better than banning all abortions. Hell, Rand Paul freely admits that is the purpose of his bill. Personhood only picked up a little steam in the last few years. It is similar to "Intelligent Design" pushed by Creationists to get their viewpoint into the classroom. Creationism became an icky word, so "Intelligent Design" replaced it. Branding is very important.



  2. #72
    Senior Member Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    611

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?

    Paul is quite a character. In the same week he takes a stand on "personhood" that is radically to the right of center in its nature, he takes a stand against existing drug laws.

    While just like his father his his voting record at moments conflict with the notation he is a true Libertarian his stance on drug laws is both very libertarian and IMHO realistically correct.

    In a time when States and the Fed face budgetary challenges dumping a load of money into busting people for using pot is just stupid. Prohibitions never work and the expense of enforcement and the costs of incarceration do not make any sense. Instead the government should regulate and tax just like they do with booze that has a much more clear record of creating havoc in peoples lives.

    I have no idea how this issue plays with greater electorate and I am not sure Paul does either, so a tip of the hat goes to him for staking out an position that cuts against convention but at least IMO makes total sense.



  3. #73
    Hung Angel Platinum Poster trish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    The United Fuckin' States of America
    Posts
    13,898

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?

    If fetuses as persons we should count them in the census and charge them with criminal negligence when they cause the death of their mothers.


    1 out of 1 members liked this post.
    "...I no longer believe that people's secrets are defined and communicable, or their feelings full-blown and easy to recognize."_Alice Munro, Chaddeleys and Flemings.

    "...the order in creation which you see is that which you have put there, like a string in a maze, so that you shall not lose your way". _Judge Holden, Cormac McCarthy's, BLOOD MERIDIAN.

  4. #74
    Senior Member Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    611

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?

    Quote Originally Posted by trish View Post
    If fetuses as persons we should count them in the census and charge them with criminal negligence when they cause the death of their mothers.
    Great take!



  5. #75
    Platinum Poster Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    11,514

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?




  6. #76
    Platinum Poster Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    11,514

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?

    The Flaw in Libertarian Theology:




  7. #77

  8. #78
    Platinum Poster Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    11,514

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?

    We should bear in mind that we don't have a capitalist system. No capitalist system has ever survived. It'd self destruct in 5 minutes. So what we have is a kind of state-capitalist system. With the state playing a substantial role. Think: bailouts, research and development etc., etc.
    Without the state, well, the corporate sector wouldn't be viable.
    Is there an alternative to this???




  9. #79
    Silver Poster yodajazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    3,184

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben View Post
    We should bear in mind that we don't have a capitalist system. No capitalist system has ever survived. It'd self destruct in 5 minutes. So what we have is a kind of state-capitalist system. With the state playing a substantial role. Think: bailouts, research and development etc., etc.
    Without the state, well, the corporate sector wouldn't be viable.
    Is there an alternative to this???

    I agree, but your statement, should contain about 500 'etc' in order to be more accurate. I now understand that most free trade agreements, contain copyright protections for US businesses. Actually some businesses are able to keep, the state or local tax money they collect from their employees, under the name of tax credits for business development. The list goes on and on. Assuming the official version of 9/11 was correct, 19 of the 21 attackers were from Saudi Arabia, however the US has strong business ties with that nation. But the US did not have that many business ties with Iraq, before the invasion. Contracts to 'rebuild Iraq' were given to US private contractors, as well.



  10. #80
    Platinum Poster Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    11,514

    Default Re: What, no Rand Paul thread?

    Quote Originally Posted by yodajazz View Post
    I agree, but your statement, should contain about 500 'etc' in order to be more accurate. I now understand that most free trade agreements, contain copyright protections for US businesses. Actually some businesses are able to keep, the state or local tax money they collect from their employees, under the name of tax credits for business development. The list goes on and on. Assuming the official version of 9/11 was correct, 19 of the 21 attackers were from Saudi Arabia, however the US has strong business ties with that nation. But the US did not have that many business ties with Iraq, before the invasion. Contracts to 'rebuild Iraq' were given to US private contractors, as well.
    YJ, here's the economist Dean Baker on: Patents, Copyrights, & Other Protectionist Barriers:




Similar Threads

  1. For Ron Paul fans...
    By Ben in forum Politics and Religion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-09-2009, 10:23 PM
  2. Ru Paul competition
    By thx1138 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-23-2009, 08:17 AM
  3. obama vs ron paul
    By MoonAndStar in forum Politics and Religion
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 10-31-2008, 08:25 AM
  4. Rand corp wants a major war to get the US
    By thx1138 in forum Politics and Religion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-30-2008, 10:43 PM
  5. Because Ron Paul is nuts, that's why!
    By chefmike in forum Politics and Religion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10-08-2008, 03:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •