Most Top guys are good looking while powerbottoms are not that pleasant looking?

[alyssats]

Well, I think it's an interesting observation (the original post). I don't quite understand why a guy who wants to bottom would hire a TG. If you want dick, why not hire a studly young M4M ? Come to think of it, you can easily find M4M for free if you are at least marginally attractive. But the M4M market is much smaller than the T4M market. I've never quite understood why, but my guess is that being with a TG is, for some guys, like fulfilling a "gay" fantasy without being outright gay. Something like that -- not sure. (????)

As for me, I've never bottomed and have no interest in doing so.

I am curious to know, though, how a TG escort can perform as a top with an unattractive client ? I mean, how do you get it up ? I guess it's a job and you get used to it. Maybe Viagra or something too.

interesting observation also just last night a client of mine asked me how could i able to get hard to a guy like him(his hairy and unfit) and he said what if a guy is more fat and unattractive than him it might be very hard to TS girls to top them. i just keep silent

[kensterling]

Just so you know, the M4M market is quite large and doing fine. I have been escorting for 13 years and there are still plenty of men seeking men. MF couples hire male escorts all the time for different reasons. In my market, with the TS being more mainstream in the last 5-7 years, my work with female escorts for bi male customers that wanted a M/F together is off. They can get all the want with a TS, top and bottom. Just letting all know what is going on out there.

[MrF]

^ Thanks, Kensterling. It's getting slightly off topic, but I'm curious to know how large the M4M market is relative to T4M ? Because my impression is that the number of M4M ads is smaller than the number of T4M ads, whenever I checked (which was not very often and I admit I have not "researched" it). As far as I can tell, if a guy wants a gay man it's much easier to find for free than a TGirl.

[BeardedOne]

^ Thanks, Kensterling. It's getting slightly off topic, but I'm curious to know how large the M4M market is relative to T4M ? Because my impression is that the number of M4M ads is smaller than the number of T4M ads, whenever I checked (which was not very often and I admit I have not "researched" it). As far as I can tell, if a guy wants a gay man it's much easier to find for free than a TGirl.

From a shopper's viewpoint, the M4M market is hoppin'. One popular site lists over 1500 ads for the US today (And 1330 in China, who'da thunk it?). Larger cities have about 80 ads on average while smaller ones might have only two or three. Though Eros has a section for male escorts I've yet to see one single ad appear there. It depends on where you're looking. There are a fair number of commercial listing sites out there.

@ Alyssa, thanx for clarifying "...some not all...", as I certainly hope that you wouldn't find me fat and unattractive. I'm not fat...well...maybe 'pudgy'...but I'm big-boned. And I'll attach a pic so you can see my devilishly striking good looks.

@ Ken, haven't seen you post in quite a while. Welcome back to the locker room.

[BlkJewels]

Ive noticed from my clientelle most good looking, fit, young and yummy guys are mostly top and active in bed.

While the middle age and mature ones, unfit and not so pleasant looking ones are the powerbottom ones. Why is it like that?

Careful babygirl, u dont want to hurt your clients feelinz.

[slinky]

Ive noticed from my clientelle most good looking, fit, young and yummy guys are mostly top and active in bed.

While the middle age and mature ones, unfit and not so pleasant looking ones are the powerbottom ones. Why is it like that?

most TS girls who are "bottom only" before become "power top" in a few years because its where the money and traffic is. 99.99% of TS admirer/chasers are powerbottoms and they look for top and versatile girls

also if your into sex work and mainly bottom that would not last long because too much sex in the ass is not advisable so most TS girls shift to become top so as not to overused their asses

Hmmmmmmm...... so in other words, you are basing your premise on the 1 out of ten thousand clients which are "good looking, fit, young and yummy guys (who) are mostly top and active in bed"??? Assuming you'd have to have this happen at least about a dozen times to notice a trend, you've seen 120,000 guys and that's what you are basing your conclusions on?

Well, at least that's what you get when you use your own premise and figures.

[kensterling]

Hi, MrF. You probably don't see too many guy ads if you look in eros or other more mainstream sites. If you go directly to man on man sites, it's like bearded one said, there are ALOT of guys out there. Plenty of competition like the TS. Obviously if you are bi and versitle there is alot more clients to choose from. But there in niche work as well. The biz has been very good to me.
Thanks for the welcome back bearded one, good to see the locker room is open, LOL!

[russtafa]

sex between lovers should be for pleasure and love,there are no rules except not to cause your partner pain

[bte]

Some TS Admirers/Chasers like to bottom and some like to top. When a guy pays for a TS escort, I would think that they would be paying to bottom, based on what most of the guys say on this site. I wouldn't worry about it if I was you as long as you are getting paid.

Although, when I was in my "gay days" I noticed that most mature unfit guys chose to bottom as oppose to being tops. But then again, I noticed the opposite is true, so who knows. It all comes down to preference.

[slinky]

Remember that a surprising amount of TS porn (as can be seen by various surveys over the years on this site) is bought by guys who only want SOLO stuff (and if not that, still TS bottoming; look at the recent thread where a guys asks for clips of TS creampie/guy receiving and the lack of such product found as an answer). I think that there has certainly been a shift from the amount of requests from clients asking to be topped over the years to being bottomed, and the same for the amount of porn being shot (before the Third World Media stuff, it was almost non-existent) but I also think the amount of the shift has been greatly overstated.

And to follow-up on my first post in this thread (where is seems what I stated was largely ignored, and then brought up as a new idea later) - that I think the correlation of "older" to "not buff, good looking, etc" is as high or higher than the "buff, good looking, etc" as top vs "older, less good looking, etc.". As such, I'm not so sure, mathematically, the conclusions being drawn are correct, and stand by my original thesis. (thx to NYBURBS for the support).