Results 21 to 30 of 38
Thread: LA girls - beware LE
-
12-06-2009 #21
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Planet Earth
- Posts
- 397
Originally Posted by BellaBellucci
-
12-06-2009 #22
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Bkny
- Posts
- 299
why don't the workers require the cops/johns to take there dicks out?
or and this is foolproof... hand them a phone and have them take an xrated pic which is immediately sent to a server or email.
Cops can't start taking pics of exposed girls (which are timestamped!) If they take the picture they won't be cops or the case will be thrown out.
But yeah I would think that would have been entrapment!
<^ . .^>
( İvİ )
-
12-06-2009 #23Originally Posted by notdrunk
~BB~
-
12-06-2009 #24Originally Posted by BellaBellucci
And maybe its easier to withdraw from life
With all of its misery and wretched lies
If we're dead when tomorrow's gone
The Big Machine will just move on
Still we cling afraid we'll fall
Clinging like the memory which haunts us all
-
12-06-2009 #25Originally Posted by SarahG
In short, legality refers to the relationship between the legislature and the people while constitutionality refers to the relationship between the legislative and judicial branches.
~BB~
-
12-06-2009 #26Originally Posted by whatislove
Originally Posted by whatislove
-
12-06-2009 #27Originally Posted by BellaBellucci
To use an example, if a postop marries a guy in a state of the US, the state might marry him- so the marriage is legal, right? Not so fast, if the guy dies and his surviving family decides to challenge the marriage in court to try to get all of the inheritance, and the judge rules the marriage illegal per her being trans (this is basically what happened in Littleton) the marriage isn't just ended, but made so that it never legally existed in the first place. Every moment of that marriage would be defined as illegal, going all the way back to the first second of it.
In the reverse situation, a cop could try to arrest someone for anything, that doesn't mean a given action is illegal. It would only be illegal if the charge holds up to legal scrutiny.
And maybe its easier to withdraw from life
With all of its misery and wretched lies
If we're dead when tomorrow's gone
The Big Machine will just move on
Still we cling afraid we'll fall
Clinging like the memory which haunts us all
-
12-06-2009 #28
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Wichita, KS
- Posts
- 70
Originally Posted by caliuncut
-
12-06-2009 #29Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
Secondly I've never had a DUI and dont drive drunk and havent ever had issues with cops and alcohol.
My issue with them is just what I said, they get their rocks off fucking with people just like that fat fuck in the videos. Check out part 2 and you'll see sparkle in his eye when they're in the restaurant talking about it.
Now as far as me being snotty, I don't see how you figure that. Maybe you got friends and fam in LE and I hate to break it to you but they're prolly douchebags too.
-
12-06-2009 #30Originally Posted by SarahG
No. I'm telling you that isn't true. If a law is on the books then it's legal - period (see Jim Crow laws for instance - 'current practice' at the time but unable to withstand 'legal scrutiny' - people could not be sued for discrimination after the fact). If that law ends up being struck down as unconstitutional that doesn't mean that anybody broke the law by enforcing it beforehand. It can be on the books for years before it's challenged and overturned at which time it THEN becomes illegal - yes retroactively, but the 'current practice' would have been legal at the time it occurred. The 'legal scrutiny' to which you refer is actually what constitutionality is and can only be decided upon long after a law has already been passed.
~BB~