Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 136
  1. #31
    Senior Member Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,527



  2. #32
    Gold Poster peggygee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the hearts of the kind, and in the fears of the wicked.
    Posts
    3,968

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
    Are you up on this stuff, Peggy?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBL_controversy
    I am indeed aware of the theories espoused by Blanchard, Bailey,
    Lawrence, et al, and while I don't agree with them in totality, I feel that
    there are elements of merit to it, much as the works of Benjamin
    still have degrees of credibility.

    In discussing and attempting to understand gender dysphoria we must
    have some frame of reference. And while Blanchard and Bailey may not
    have always employed the best techniques in validating and quantifying
    their research, and then allowed themselves to become embroiled in
    gender politics, I do applaud and encourage anyone who is willing to
    attempt to bring some clarity to such a challenging subject.




  3. #33
    Senior Member Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,527

    Default

    Today, I observe and speak with quite a few younger transwomen, who by choice or necessity seem to live only for today.

    They appear to live as if their mantra was 'Live fast, die young and leave a
    good looking corpse'
    To me, that's casting shade.

    And I think you should talk about your research, your charitable work, etc. Why be on a pre-op porn forum and not reveal more about that stuff?

    To me, there's something odd about both you and Phobun being here. Both of you in your own ways are dissidents. Neither of you are of the thinking that pre-ops are at an ok place. You're both pushing the idea that transsexuality is a dysphoria of the individual, and not the society. It reeks of heterosexism imho.



  4. #34
    Gold Poster peggygee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the hearts of the kind, and in the fears of the wicked.
    Posts
    3,968

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
    For myself, I most definetely subscibe to a binary definition of gender - male, female.

    Third gender, gender variant, gender queer are not an option gender
    orientation wise for me, though admittedly I am mildly bisexual, though
    that is an issue of sexual orientation moreso.



  5. #35
    Senior Member Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peggygee
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
    Are you up on this stuff, Peggy?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBL_controversy
    I am indeed aware of the theories espoused by Blanchard, Bailey,
    Lawrence, et al, and while I don't agree with them in totality, I feel that
    there are elements of merit to it, much as the works of Benjamin
    still have degrees of credibility.

    In discussing and attempting to understand gender dysphoria we must
    have some frame of reference. And while Blanchard and Bailey may not
    have always employed the best techniques in validating and quantifying
    their research, and then allowed themselves to become embroiled in
    gender politics, I do applaud and encourage anyone who is willing to
    attempt to bring some clarity to such a challenging subject.

    So you feel that there are true and untrue transsexuals?

    Do you feel that you had SRS because it corrected a mistake, or because it just made life easier? Was it easier to feel at home in your own skin because people like Phobun wouldn't assign freak-status to you? Btw, what do you think of the way Phobun speaks to me? Or, let's put it another way. Even if you would absolve me of such things, does his philosophy have merit?



  6. #36
    Senior Member Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peggygee
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
    For myself, I most definetely subscibe to a binary definition of gender - male, female.

    Third gender, gender variant, gender queer are not an option gender
    orientation wise for me, though admittedly I am mildly bisexual, though
    that is an issue of sexual orientation moreso.
    So the third gender is not an option. Does that make you a pseudo woman? Because you aren't a biological one. Are you one of God's imperfect creatures?



  7. #37
    Senior Member Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,527

    Default

    One last question. If "vaginas are beautiful", aren't cocks beautiful too? And if they are, doesn't that mean a beautiful woman can have a beautiful cock? Or does a cock look ugly on a woman? Being mildly bi, what do you think? Does a cock look good on a chick?



  8. #38
    Senior Member Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    934

    Default

    Gender is definitely not binary....

    Just ask the South African Olympic committee.

    Are cocks beautiful? That depends on the person.



  9. #39
    Senior Member Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dc_guy_75
    Gender is definitely not binary....

    Just ask the South African Olympic committee.

    Are cocks beautiful? That depends on the person.
    You mean on the cock, right? Do girls look less feminine with cocks, or just less capable of procreation. Do genitals define our gender?



  10. #40
    Gold Poster peggygee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the hearts of the kind, and in the fears of the wicked.
    Posts
    3,968

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole Dupre
    Today, I observe and speak with quite a few younger transwomen, who by choice or necessity seem to live only for today.

    They appear to live as if their mantra was 'Live fast, die young and leave a
    good looking corpse'
    To me, that's casting shade.

    And I think you should talk about your research, your charitable work, etc. Why be on a pre-op porn forum and not reveal more about that stuff?

    To me, there's something odd about both you and Phobun being here. Both of you in your own ways are dissidents. Neither of you are of the thinking that pre-ops are at an ok place. You're both pushing the idea that transsexuality is a dysphoria of the individual, and not the society. It reeks of heterosexism imho.
    I wil stick by my statement that by necessity or choice a fair number of
    transwomen are not planning for the future.

    This can even be evidenced by this thread, we are not seeing many
    responses to the question "What happens to tgirls when they get old er)?".

    As to your contenton that I see being pre op as a problem, again I will
    maintain that you are incorrect. There are many pre op, (though perhaps
    non op would be more accurate) women who are very happy with their
    penis, they do not suffer any angst from it. Indeed it could be said that
    they do not suffer from gender dysphoria.


    And I think you should talk about your research, your charitable work, etc. Why be on a pre-op porn forum and not reveal more about that stuff?
    Much like many of the other members of this and other forums, I write on
    many things, some GID related, some not, but I am certain that there has
    been no paucity of information from me on the topic.

    Admittedly, my posts my not have dick pics, or be of a pruient nature, and
    can at times be pedantic and verbose, but they are there for anyone that
    wants to peruse them.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •