Results 41 to 50 of 203
Thread: STOP IT!!!
-
11-05-2009 #41
I like all the *hate* that's coming out between transsexuals and the male posters here.
Throws the reality of the situation into sharpest relief.
Learn, boys, from the spewings of the vipers.
-
11-05-2009 #42
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,527
Originally Posted by phobun
Until next time, sweetheart. Now get your vagina-loving self back to not seeing all of the cocks on the cock forum for cock lovers.
-
11-05-2009 #43
These kind of threads remind me of what Diana Vreeland was once asked what she thought of the way most people dressed.
To which she responded-
"Most people, are not something one thinks about"
-
11-05-2009 #44Originally Posted by AllanahStarrNYC
Anyways, we seem to forget that media are always discussing the looks, weight and surgeries of entertainers.
* Is Britney getting fat?
* Did Angelina get surgery?
* Is (insert entertainer's name here) getting too fat or skinny?
* Check out the new curves on so and so?
Fact is people in the pubic eye are subject to praise and/or criticism for what they do to their faces/bodies, the clothes they wear, or the relationships they have.
Kimberly James, like Britney Spears, is an entertainer. If I'm not mistaken she posed for that pic on the first page. It's not like someone sneaked into her home and took the photograph.
Originally Posted by suckseed
-
11-05-2009 #45
Hmm, she was asked why she thought of the way people dressed because she was the editor in chieft at Harpers and Vogue int he 60's and later the curator at the Met Costume Institute. One of the most important figures in American fashion, credited with launching the careers of many designers, models, and Lauren Bacall. She passed in the late 80's.
I think she was being scarcastic as she was known for her wit and shard tounge. I don't think it's supposed ot be literal- I think sh is saying 'who cares what people think of you'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_Vreeland
-
11-05-2009 #46
Some public figures, whether politicians, transsexual celebrities, etc., are simply beyond reproach... if you criticize certain transsexuals for instance, you're a hater, a misogynist and a "faggot".
If we all sing their praises in harmony according to the same songbook, and laud those deserving of worship using the liturgy of transsexualdom, then no one will smite you down.
There shall be no dissenting opinions about what the goddesses desire.
-
11-05-2009 #47
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 62
Originally Posted by Legend
-
11-05-2009 #48
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,527
Originally Posted by phobun
Newsflash: This is a forum with forum members. You're not having a private conversation in a bar. You're not a political journalist who's paid to write a column. If you have such strong opinions, perhaps write a blog and see it anyone bothers paying attention to it. But here, you're actually mingling with transsexual women. And, based on your terminal rigidity, it's obvious you've never had one in bed, let alone even met one. You're all theory, and no practice. We've all noticed that you're not even capable of sharing a single fact about YOUR OWN life. So why do you persist in insulting our intelligence?
Porn is not about reproach or blame. Porn is about seeking and discovering pleasure, not becoming myopic about what you don't like.
You have an internal struggle going on, and are begging to be told that you're a homosexual. The logic is inescapable.
-
11-05-2009 #49Originally Posted by AllanahStarrNYC
-
11-05-2009 #50Originally Posted by flabbybody