Results 1 to 10 of 62
Thread: i was born bisexual , rofl
-
08-31-2009 #1
i was born bisexual , rofl
is there really a bisexual part of the lgbt community ? i've never seen a bisexual group march at the parade. do they really exist and if they do are bisexuals a hole in the theory of being born gay ?
and that's why the cubs will never win the series
-
11-13-2009 #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,527
Re: i was born bisexual , rofl
Originally Posted by blacktgirls
-
11-13-2009 #3
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Brighton U.K.
- Posts
- 351
Thats because we're not really part of the community. Predominatley gay bisexuals tend to claim to be gay/lesbian as its easier- there's alot of skepticism and mistrust from the community to us. Lesbians in particular mistrust bisexual women as they often have bad experiences with them, usualy being left for a man. Not everyone is like this of course, maybe two thirds are accepting, but alot see us as part timers, or gays that need to just 'come out fully'.
Mostly straight bisexual men tend to live in the closet, marry a woman and sleep with guys on the side- you'll find loads of them on gaydar. Straight women are really put off by bi men (they're worried we'll run off with a guy) so it understandable. Its also often percieved as submissive/unmasculine.
Mostly straight bisexual women tend to marry men and only come out to their husbands and close friends. They have fewer acceptance issues though.
Openly bisexual people often tend to be part of the fetish/swinging scene. They tend to be more 50/50 in preference and usualy marry each other too. I've only met one 50/50 bisexual man- though he wasn't part of the swinging scene and led a 'normal' life. He was out and in a gay relationship when I knew him. He took alot of flak though off his gay friends.
I'm generalising of course, everyones different. I'm a 75% straight bisexual (a kinsey 2 maybe?) yet i'm out. Thats mostly because I prefer tgirls and If found they're nore accepting of bi's than gay's and straights often are.
-
11-13-2009 #4
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- In the hearts of the kind, and in the fears of the wicked.
- Posts
- 3,968
Originally Posted by archineer
I feel that the "B" was added much like the "T" to bolster the ranks of the
"GL" community.
And you're right about how I would feel about being in a relationship
with a bisexual man, I would tend to be worried about him needing to
have his "dick itch' scratched.
As to me, I am more of a 1 to 1.5 if we could fractionalize the Kinsey
rating scale, much prefer the sausage to the taco, though the personality
of the individual really swings the vote.
0- Exclusively heterosexual with no homosexual
1- Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2- Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3- Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4- Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5- Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6- Exclusively homosexual
-
11-13-2009 #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 166
Originally Posted by peggygee
-
11-13-2009 #6
-
11-13-2009 #7
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 1,748
Shit the transgender community on this forum can't get along.Whether its girls transitioning vs. girls who already have, vs. crossdresser, vs. tranny chasers vs. escorts vs. porn stars, vs. web stars vs. tranny parties, vs. tops vs. bottoms, vs. straight vs. gay, vs. bi, vs. tri...( try anything sexually)........ahhh shut up!!! ok i will.
"She Shakin' It For,Daddy"
-
11-13-2009 #8
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Brighton U.K.
- Posts
- 351
Originally Posted by peggygee
-
11-14-2009 #9
Interesting discussion. Though there are some truly bisexual people in the world (I refer to them as 'genuine' bi as opposed to 'ersatz' bi ), my personal experience has been that more women fall into the genuine category while most men lie about it. The latter operating on the belief that any ass/mouth will do in a storm as long as they don't do the dreaded 'reach around' that is oft referred to here on the forums (Because that would defeat the illusion that they are still 'straight').
I've seen bisexual groups at some of the larger rallies and Pride events, but they are typically a minor showing in the warm body count. I haven't been to a major event in some years (The last being the March on Washington...In the last century), but would not be too surprised to discover that the trans groups significantly outnumber the openly bisexual people.
Generally, true bisexuals will be forever branded as undecided fence-sitters by the communities that we feel more comfortable in because said communities (GBT) are predetermined to define our sexual/emotional activities by our birth gender. If a guy likes cock, he's gay and if a woman likes kitty, she's a dyke. Anything that crosses outside of these black and white boundaries is either a 'phase' or 'denial'.
We've heard it all. "She's a four-year lesbian" and "He's just bi-curious". To this day, my ex/mother of my son, believes that I am 100% gay because I like to suck cock. Never mind the nights of torrid love-making when I pounded her into the sheets and licked her into blissful oblivion. Yah, that' sooo gay.
Would that we could all see it thusly:
**Spoiler alert** I've told this tale a dozen times here and elsewhere. If you've read it before, just look away.
Some years ago I knew (And am still in touch with the woman) a politically active couple from the mid-Atlantic region of the Eastern US. She defined herself as a lesbian while there was never any title placed or claimed on the man (Though I would rate him around a Kinsey 1-3, based on personality). They were very open about their sexuality and socio-sexual political leaning (Very pro-GLBT).
At a press conference in Richmond, I believe, a reporter approached the woman and in the line of questioning discovered that she was married. Though same-sex marriage was as yet unheard of, the reporter assumed "Oh! To a woman!" to which my friend replied"No, to that man, there!". Intrigued at the possibility of greater spectacle, the reporter darted across the room to her husband.
In the ensuing interview, the reporter naturally made the assumption that since my friend was male and his wife female (Her dykeism aside) that he was heterosexual. "Oh, I'm not heterosexual." was the reply. "Oh...Then you're bisexual." was the next progression of blind guessing. "No, I'm not bisexual" was the reply, which led the reporter to the only logical conclusion (Or so he thought): "Ah, I see, you are also homosexual!".
The straightforward and very honest reply, which confused the hell out of the reporter, was simply "I'm just sexual!".
There are, quite possibly, millions of variations in the color spectrum. Why do we keep seeing things in just black and white?
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
-
11-14-2009 #10
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 4
I'm in a mixed category...
I'm in the category of guys who are attracted to cock but don't find the male body attractive at all.
I've dated mostly girls but had a versatile tgirl girlfriend for almost 8 months my 2nd year of college and loved it. Currently I've been happily with my girl for 2 years, but miss having a cock to play with (other than my own lol)