Results 31 to 40 of 187
Thread: no shade.... but wtf?
-
08-20-2009 #31
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- not here
- Posts
- 7,128
lmao... actually that pic of that black rupaul barbie holding a shoe is mine.... i posted it in reference to mimi and that train video on youtube
wanna see what i'm up to this week?
http://www.youtube.com/tsntx
http://www.gayborhood.tv/shows.cfm?view=2
-
08-20-2009 #32Originally Posted by tsntx
Living your dream! Just call me your superhero! JIX
1/3 of the Legendary Trifecta called O ED & the Jizzzyyy...
PeekyMcWatchmeFUCK!
OEJTM-#DEGENERATES
HBSF-FETC
-
08-20-2009 #33
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,527
Look at the big brain on Brenda!?! LMAO Bitch, wtf did you teach us about physics here?
-
08-20-2009 #34
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,527
Oh, lord. lol
-
08-20-2009 #35
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Southern California
- Posts
- 941
Originally Posted by tsntx
I have the personality and people skills of a retarded home-schooled kid.
-
08-20-2009 #36
Hmmm, unless you're some kind of brutal mass-murderer you shouldn't be treated like this and exposed online. I wonder what could possess anyone to pursue someone so relentlessly.
A couple of dumb comments online and a false claim of having a degree shouldn't warrant such a hatchet job IMO. The maker is at least as warped a personality as Brenda, if not more so.
Insert funny quote here
-
08-20-2009 #37
Damn. Did Hontas shit on your cereal or something? You got mad hate for H. Farmer.
Originally Posted by Nicole DupreOriginally Posted by Nicole DupreOriginally Posted by Nicole DupreOriginally Posted by Nicole Dupre
Originally Posted by suckseed
-
08-20-2009 #38Originally Posted by DL_NL
It requires no skill to spot the incoherence in the claims about education, work, religion and politics. It is not easy to understand what motivates an eccentric individual to seek a public persona. But to try and viciously humiliate and hurt her, unprovoked, suggests (to me) that her attackers have their own psychopathology.
-
08-20-2009 #39Originally Posted by phobun
Those videos give a glimpse of Hontas's persona and presentation. They reveal that Hontas has not had any significant electrolysis. Hontas has visible masculine facial hair, and doesn't conceal a five-o'clock shadow with makeup (see photos below). This is unusual for someone claiming to be MtF "transsexual", because facial hair removal is of the highest priority for most such women.
Hontas also reveals that J. Michael Bailey is Hontas’ friend in this link:
http://www.scientificblogging.com/profile/hFarmer
Thus it’s no surprise that Hontas promotes the highly pathologizing BBL two-type theoretical model of transsexualism. Hontas self-identifies as being of the "homosexual transsexual" type, basing this on claims of extreme femininity since childhood, great beauty, etc. However, this claim appears to be inconsistent with observable evidence such as Hontas's presentation (as in the following photos and the video links above and below).
Is that so fucking hard!? Really!?
You can't pretend to be for "trans issues" or some ethical high-road if you're doing the kind of things we yell at the fundies for... no matter how disgusting you may find someone's position on a given thing to be.
Is that so much to ask for? It's not like anyone's being expected to memorize the Leviathan here.
Sadly the only thing that surprises me about this thread are how many people are claiming to be shocked by it. I.e. comments like "I wonder what could possess anyone to pursue someone so relentlessly" I find confusing since, it should be pretty clear to anyone who lurks on trans forums often enough, that this sort of thing happens quite frequently in the so-called "trans community."
People talk about how evil various non-trans groups are, but at the end of the day a good portion of the outtings (i.e. people who can't pass belligerently attacking and outting those who live in stealth & pass), violence (i.e. the whole Sylvia Boots case), and stalkings (I can think of examples but none that I'd want to post publicly on HA) are from within the community.
This is, in my opinion, part of a much bigger problem that plagues the entire LGBT "community." Just look at all the gay activists that encourage belligerently outting other gay people for "working against the movement." The problem with this, of course, is defining what exactly IS working against the movement. Does it take simply being a republican? Does it mean working for a company that lobbies against marriage rights? Does it mean NOT doing something (like "not being a democrat")? Does it mean requiring everyone to be "out and proud" at protests? Allowing those sorts of attacks at all only allows people to twist it to fulfill their own personal agendas, and when that happens it ceases to be about whats hurtful or helpful for the movement, and instead becomes a tool of personal vendetta where people get attacked simply for insulting the wrong "activist."
And maybe its easier to withdraw from life
With all of its misery and wretched lies
If we're dead when tomorrow's gone
The Big Machine will just move on
Still we cling afraid we'll fall
Clinging like the memory which haunts us all
-
08-20-2009 #40
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,527
Originally Posted by 2009AD