Results 11 to 20 of 53
-
08-18-2009 #11
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Tampadelphia
- Posts
- 56
-cockhounds is in parethesis which measns its not my terminology.
-whatever time it is in the u.s is still to early
-trying to belittle me isnt at all helping you
It is what it is...
-
08-18-2009 #12
Re: double topic/Love yourself ladies+Str8 men and ts girl p
Originally Posted by tygren1@yahoo.com
You know how bait & switch pisses people off in shopping? Its worse in dating. If a guy hides who he is, hoping it will help his odds, then it makes it all the more worse when he eventually throws down that facade to show that he really is, and always was a "dick-hungry boy wanting you to dominate him."
And its not any better if the guy claims to be both, if the girl doesn't want to top, she doesn't want to top; will the guy be ok with that... or will he try to pressure her into it whenever he is craving it (even if its only occasionally)? Will he cheat on her knowing she doesn't like to/won't give him what he wants (even if its only occasionally)?
And maybe its easier to withdraw from life
With all of its misery and wretched lies
If we're dead when tomorrow's gone
The Big Machine will just move on
Still we cling afraid we'll fall
Clinging like the memory which haunts us all
-
08-18-2009 #13
How many guys are craving to bottom, SarahG??
This place is really getting ridiculous with the judgmental and hypocrital attitudes towards any man who tries to fully express what he means by have an intense attraction for TGs.
Sure, there's a percentage of guys on here who are looking to get fucked, but I'd take it that most aren't looking to bottom.
Cockhound is a slur and an utterly pointless term.
Yeah, use of the word often passes for wit around here, but how many men REALLY are attracted to anything with a cock attached to it??
If that's how some girls think, I feel sorry for them because it's totally a pathetic, self-defeating attitude.
No str8 man likes all GGs because they have tits, or a pussy, or a phat ass. Attraction for men is more than just gentalia.
The girls on this site I really dig I could imagine kicking it with them all day and never have them once take their clothes off. ( Well, most of the day !!)
It's ironic, because so many of the most strident cynical guys and bitter girls decry the sin of objectification, yet I've engaged in more discussion on this site with girls than I imagine I ever would on a date. In a way, we're forced to see more of the whole TG on HA, instead of gawking at a two-dimensional image.
Now, let's not forget this is a porn site, I just don't think men like myself stick around strictly to look at a few picks.
Finally , about guys who bottom. Some girls could give a damn, others I understand prefer not to top. And there are guys who have utter contempt for other dudes who bottom, which makes no sense, personally.
Look, I've never been fucked in the ass, can't imagine a scenario where I'd be fucked in the ass. Never requested it, never had a desire to do it.
Now, I'v had GG gfs who've asked, casually, would I mind very much if they were to fuck me in the ass. Some chicks are really curious about what's it's like to fuck someone(!)
MOst of the time I've said, "would you butt-fuck your daddy? ", just to check them that I was NOT interested.
But see, the real issue was that many girls brought that shit up to deflate my ego, to find out how far I would let them go.
However, if a GG was totally sincere and serious about topping, and I had true feelings for her, if she kept asking to try it, I could see it happening.
I know some TGs really enjoy topping occasionally, and if she was insistent and I felt cool with her, I don't see why it would be absolutely off-limits.
But that's the extent of it, and I don't see how it justifies someone calling someone else a cockhound or powerbottom for discussing it.
All the men here signed up because there's something about a sexy girl WITH a cock that pushes us over the edge, what I don't understand is those who get self-righteous about it and feel compelled to pass judgement about what is an 'appropriate' level of attraction towards a transgendered woman.
-
08-18-2009 #14Originally Posted by giovanni_hotel
If a guy is up front about being a bottom, and finds a girl who is ok with it- who really gives a shit?
But you can't deny there are some (some, not all) guys who lie & cover up that they like to bottom, who in saying their verisital really mean they "expect to have it both ways" with any girl they're with, or worse; react belligerently whenever a girl either looses functionality, or gets srs.
When some guys go around dumping girls who don't want to top, or can't get hard, or get srs- how many times do you think a girl is going to put up with that shit before she says "you know, I am fucking tired of these lying, controlling cockbandits." But does that mean all men? No, I've yet to see a girl go lesbian over it (as far as I know anyway).
Sure, there's a percentage of guys on here who are looking to get fucked, but I'd take it that most aren't looking to bottom.
Cockhound is a slur and an utterly pointless term.
I think the reason why guys take issue to the "cockhound" or "cockbandit" slurs is because they're so unfamiliar with how women usually talk about guys who offend them.
HA uniquely gives guys a window into the criticisms girls sometimes have regarding the more crudish guys out there. In the real world, when involving straight gg's- is not something that guys usually get to see or hear because GG's are more likely to talk about such topics quietly among themselves. Usually the only time gg's will talk about stuff like that uncensored around a guy is if they think he's gay...
Yeah, use of the word often passes for wit around here, but how many men REALLY are attracted to anything with a cock attached to it??
In the case of the clubkid thread, as the title & original post that started that thread state- the whole premise of the thread is basically "fem boys who would make for attractive tgirls" (I am paraphrasing, I'd have to find the thread to get the wording exact). WOULD is the operative word here; and yet we see so many guys who respond to that thread talking about them as if they're girls, only to get pissed off and/or belligerent upon someone going "uhh, you realize this isn't supposed to be a thread for early transition'd transitioners, but for fem BOYS who aren't in any way trans?"
Its like they need to pretend the girl is trans to justify masturbating to their pictures, and then when someone shatters the fragile illusion by showing them reality- they get all pissed off for ruining it for them. If you're into fem boys, fine- there's nothing wrong with that. But pretending people are something else to rationalize it 1- is like saying it IS bad to like "fem BOYS," 2- labels those fem boys as trans when they don't actually identify that way, 3- lumps people who don't even identify as trans in with the people who are trans, falsely appropriating trans-labels to the disservice of those who really are trans.
Perhaps this is a better question; why are some guys so afraid of simply owning up to it when they only care about the cock?
Actually let's go a whole other step here and ask why some guys (some, not all) are picky... by wanting girls who ARE NOT fem. People have flat out said on here before that they prefer it when trans girls are unpassable or masculine.
And there are guys who have utter contempt for other dudes who bottom, which makes no sense, personally.
Of course, there are plenty of scenarios where there is more to it than that; like the guys (some, not all) who feel they should tell a girl (who they don't even know IRL) whether or not she should get srs... or the guys who think they should be able to tell a girl to go on viagra if she has functionality problems... or the guys who give unpassable girls a lecture whenever they consider a surgery like FFS that would make them more passable...
I suspect most guys would find it more than mildly offensive if girls, who don't even know them, tried to tell them in public places in front of other strangers what they should or shouldn't do with their bodies.
And maybe its easier to withdraw from life
With all of its misery and wretched lies
If we're dead when tomorrow's gone
The Big Machine will just move on
Still we cling afraid we'll fall
Clinging like the memory which haunts us all
-
08-18-2009 #15
i think you spelled Caesar wrong in you signature.
-
08-18-2009 #16
tygren1@yahoo.com
My man, I really dislike you fronting Marvin Gaye on your post. But I agree with you that anyone talking about your 'syntax" on a tranny site is missing something. No one comes to this site for grammer instruction. (or for GMT lectures) But before I side with you anymore, please remove the Marvin Gaye picture.
-
08-18-2009 #17
Just speaking of myself and what i feel:
I would usually like a straight guy whos not into TS girls than TS admirers/chasers/cockhounds. The thing that ive noticed with a straight guy that ive met in a club or restaurant or mall they usually like me because they seems attracted to my beauty(inside and out) unlike most TS chasers who seem to like trannies because of their dick. I like guys who will be a guy for me and treat me as a girl
And also it seems that most tranny chasers are so much promiscous and like playing games. They like to collect and try as many tranny as they can and like to lie so much and make bullshit i dont know why. Ive met many tranny chaser who told me that its their first time with me and would later found out that theyve been to many of my TS friends
-
08-18-2009 #18Originally Posted by alyssats
-
08-18-2009 #19Originally Posted by buckjohnson
by the way also all my TS friends(100% of them lol) said to me they would also prefer a straight guy over TS admirers/chasers/cockhounds
just sharing
-
08-19-2009 #20
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Tampadelphia
- Posts
- 56
Originally Posted by buckjohnson
It is what it is...