This Crazy Clueless Cunt...

[Nicole Dupre]

I like Sarah Palin.

Really?

I bet that you would have loved Eva Braun....

And Eva Peron even more....

I wouldn't really compare those women to Palin. Palin is a cheerleader/puppet/pro politician. The 'pubs picked her when they chose to play the 'woman card'. Not such a bad strategy, considering she seems like she's actually capable of enjoying sex. Hillary was too obvious about being frumpy and kinda butch.

But the two Eva's in question never stooped low enough to seek being patronized for having down syndrome offspring. So I see Palin as being shamelessly ambitious. In the end, she's no better than the evil third world mothers who disfigure their children as a strategy to up their earning-potential as beggars.

[Belial]

Yet another political thread, being spammed into the general discussion. Funny how when a thread is anti-Obama, it gets immediately thrown into the Political section. But the pro Democrat National socialist worker's party threads, are allowed to fester. It just proves that the mods are drinking the same Kool-Aid, as the rest of the 90% DemoRats on this forum.

When I read the title of this thread, I thought it was about Nancy Pelosi. Who's truly the dumbest cunt in US history. We currently have the Worst, and most incompetent, White house and Congress in history. And Yet, people are STILL worried about a woman who's not even in power?
Unbelievable.

Silly argument? Palin is a dummy and doesn't deserve to grace the Oval Office, just as Dumbya never did either.

As opposed to the incompetent numbskull that's in there now?

Sarah Palin on Evolution and Climate Change
"The logic loops in her answer make me nervous. I suppose her position is that fossil fuels cause pollution and that cleaning up pollution is necessary. I am not sure how she can possibly believe that humans did not contribute to climate change AND think we can do something to slow it down. This is a very serious logic gap that she really needs to fill in."
http://sefora.org/2008/09/30/sarah-p...limate-change/

Do people in general, ever ask themselves why the DemoRats used to call it Global warming for so many years, and have now changed their position, and call it Climate change? It's because we started having really cold winters, and some cool summers, so their global warming argument was looking really ridiculous. Well before the Industrial age, or even before man, There's ALWAYS been climate change on the planet, and there always will be...It has nothing to do with it being man made, as the scam artists on the far left, would have you believe.

So what's your answer to my question then, arnie? What is "downright evil" as Palin has put it, affordable healthcare for the majority or a massively bloated military budget which only encourages phony wars like Iraq?

The military is far more important than a really bad Health care system, for a bunch of layabouts. Especially if we get hit with another Terrorist attack. Many al Qaeda were Killed and captured in Iraq, which probably helped to prevent several future attacks in the US. We never got hit with another attack, again. Who would have believed that on the day after 9-11? When everyone thought we were sure to get hit again?

So all of the 80%-90% Obama worshipers on HA, can take their Kool-Aid and stick it where the sun don't shine.

It's looking more and more, like Obama's Reign will only last one term, and I'm looking forward to better days without him, Reid, and Pelosi

As for Thatcher ,last Prime Minister we ever had with balls

That evil bitch deserves to Rot In Piss for what she did to this country!

Bite your tongue! Thatcher was the UK's best PM since Churchill. Most of the rest, have been clowns. So grow up.

[Jericho]

Bite your tongue! Thatcher was the UK's best PM since Churchill. Most of the rest, have been clowns. So grow up.

Don't worry, someone'll be along to fasten the straps on your PJ's soon!

[Rogers]

Yet another political thread, being spammed into the general discussion. Funny how when a thread is anti-Obama, it gets immediately thrown into the Political section. But the pro Democrat National socialist worker's party threads, are allowed to fester. It just proves that the mods are drinking the same Kool-Aid, as the rest of the 90% DemoRats on this forum.

Why everything in bold? Afraid your words aren't powerful enough on their own, or are you just another account of the White_Mounted_Canadian's?

As opposed to the incompetent numbskull that's in there now?

Not denying Palin's a dummy then?

Do people in general, ever ask themselves why the DemoRats used to call it Global warming for so many years, and have now changed their position, and call it Climate change? It's because we started having really cold winters, and some cool summers, so their global warming argument was looking really ridiculous. Well before the Industrial age, or even before man, There's ALWAYS been climate change on the planet, and there always will be...It has nothing to do with it being man made, as the scam artists on the far left, would have you believe.

*YAWN* The same old and extremely weak straw-man used by skeptics for decades. Feel free to bring up all the long debunked arguments they've used on the P&R board where they've been debated ad nauseum, because if that's all you've got then too bad for you.

The military is far more important than a really bad Health care system, for a bunch of layabouts. Especially if we get hit with another Terrorist attack. Many al Qaeda were Killed and captured in Iraq, which probably helped to prevent several future attacks in the US. We never got hit with another attack, again. Who would have believed that on the day after 9-11? When everyone thought we were sure to get hit again?

So all of the 80%-90% Obama worshipers on HA, can take their Kool-Aid and stick it where the sun don't shine.

Bold AND the "shades" emoticon! LMAO!!! Did they ever find those damned W.M.D.s' in Iraq, or O.B.L. for that matter? 9/11 happened because the bloated U.S. military is poking it's big fat nose into far too many areas where it doesn't belong. NOT because Arabs hate the American way of life.
http://www.newstatesman.com/asia/200...world-war-iraq

[Helvis2012]

Who gives a shit what she says? The stupid bitch can't even run her own home successfully so why anyone would take her opinions on public matters seriously is laughable.

What she doesn't realize is the freakshow element. The press is content to let her go on and on but Palin doesn't realize she marginalizing herself and the GOP more and more whenever she speaks.

[SarahG]

That's okay. Let her keep making her stupid comments and digging a deeper grave for the Republican Party. After all, she is the FACE of the RP! Her and Rush Limbaugh, that is.

Here's the difference; among the voting population a big chunk of the people see Rush for what he is; a talking head who isn't to be taken seriously 100% of the time. Lots of people on the right love him, just as lots of them love Coulter- but that doesn't mean they'd vote for him in a primary.

Palin on the other hand... people are entranced by her to a point where they WOULD give her support that the typical talking heads (i.e. Rush & Coulter) would never be able to get in a presidential primary.

Which is why Rush keeps talking on the air, and Coulter keeps writing books. They know its what they're best at.

[SarahG]

I like Sarah Palin.

The next time you see Sarah, tell her you are a TGirl and that you just love her position on GLBT rights.

http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesb...SarahPalin.htm

If she were to find Palin in public and say "I am a tgirl" I'm sure she's quickly be hauled off & tazed immediately like that guy who tried to talk with Kerry a few years back.

[Dirky]

Palin on the other hand... people are entranced by her to a point where they WOULD give her support

Were entranced by her, you mean? I think most people in the GOP are over their Palin infatuation. They know she's not qualified, she's wacky and would never win a major election. The McCain people tried their best to give her a positive spin and show people she had some intelligence but even they knew that was a losing battle. Plus the fact that she continues to shoot herself in the foot almost every time she opens her mouth and quits her term as governor not even two years into the job, is further proof that her career in politics is dead. She has her vocal supporters who would like you to think she's still a major player but they're a small minority at best. She has NO chance to be president no matter what the Junior Chuck Norris's here on HA would like to believe

[SarahG]

I actually believe in a national health care system and I do love how your right wingers keep making reference to a 'socialised health care system ' in an attempt to scare people.

If its not socialized healthcare, then what is it?

Let's be honest here- it IS socialized health care.

Just as a lot of other things in this country either are, or used to be.

It is just not talked about in public. , .There is in the NHS in the UK a panel or panels that meets to discuss what treatments they can afford to fund which would effect the elderly in particular. This happens in each county.And there is great contreversy in the UK about certain countys having better access to cancer or alzhemiers drugs for instance than others. So it is truly a postcode lottery.

Which is typical for socialized medicine regardless of country, its just that countries chose differently in how to ration.

Our proposed system is radically worse then NHS, imho, because instead of it being a NHS-like system akin to our VA hospitals, what we're doing is in a nut shell;

-Fining anyone who doesn't get health insurance
-Forcing private companies with existing health care plans (i.e. ERISA) to stop offering them within a 5-year phasing period
-Requiring all health care plans offer a minimum list of things
-Requiring all of these approved plans charge people the same price regardless of age, sex, race, prior medical history, employment, etc.

These approved plans; the ones that charge everyone the same, will be sold threw "the exchange."

The problem is that under NHS, the gov runs so much of the show in terms of the "supply" end of medical care (i.e. doctors, nurses, hospitals, clinics- those sorts of things). Since this isn't like that at all, there is nothing to truly control the expense side of the equation... only the payment side. So our existing private corporations; the pharmaceutical industry, our big chain hospitals, and so forth- can go on raping people on the cost side, business as usual.

I really don't know how, even with subsidies, these private insurance programs would ever dream of charging everyone the same rate unless the restrictions on health care access are as bad or worse then the nixon-created HMO's of yesteryear. Worse, the private insurance companies will skim who knows how much of our tax dollars off in the process.

All this plan does is throw money at big businesses. That's why so many big businesses in American health care are overjoyed at the proposal.

So really an NHS isn't perfect and it would be good if America learnt from Britains mistakes if and when it changes it's health care.

Learn as in fixing their mistakes? Surely you're joking?!?!

Why would you possibly believe our politicians are capable of THAT?

Our politicians don't even know basic elementary school knowledge, whether we're talking about Africa being a country, or who was president in 1930.

I have as much faith in that idea, as I do of putting Rush in charge of a pain management company.

[SarahG]

Palin on the other hand... people are entranced by her to a point where they WOULD give her support

Were entranced by her, you mean? I think most people in the GOP are over their Palin infatuation. They know she's not qualified, she's wacky and would never win a major election. The McCain people tried their best to give her a positive spin and show people she had some intelligence but even they knew that was a losing battle. Plus the fact that she continues to shoot herself in the foot almost every time she opens her mouth and quits her term as governor not even two years into the job, is further proof that her career in politics is dead. She has her vocal supporters who would like you to think she's still a major player but they're a small minority at best. She has NO chance to be president no matter what the Junior Chuck Norris's here on HA would like to believe

She has miles more support than either Rush or Coulter would, which is what I was saying.

I didn't say that would be enough for her to win the primary, and then the presidency.

I see the odds of that being about the same as.... Newt accomplishing that.