Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    Platinum Poster Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    11,514

    Default Top Things you Think You Know about Iran that aren't True

    Top Things you Think You Know about Iran that are not True
    By Juan Cole
    October 01, 2009

    Thursday is a fateful day for the world, as the US, other members of the United Nations Security Council, and Germany meet in Geneva with Iran in a bid to resolve outstanding issues. Although Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had earlier attempted to put the nuclear issue off the bargaining table, this rhetorical flourish was a mere opening gambit and nuclear issues will certainly dominate the talks. As Henry Kissinger pointed out, these talks are just beginning and there are highly unlikely to be any breakthroughs for a very long time. Diplomacy is a marathon, not a sprint.

    But on this occasion, I thought I'd take the opportunity to list some things that people tend to think they know about Iran, but for which the evidence is shaky.

    Belief: Iran is aggressive and has threatened to attack Israel, its neighbors or the US

    Reality: Iran has not launched an aggressive war modern history (unlike the US or Israel), and its leaders have a doctrine of "no first strike." This is true of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, as well as of Revolutionary Guards commanders.

    Belief: Iran is a militarized society bristling with dangerous weapons and a growing threat to world peace.

    Reality: Iran's military budget is a little over $6 billion annually. Sweden, Singapore and Greece all have larger military budgets. Moreover, Iran is a country of 70 million, so that its per capita spending on defense is tiny compared to these others, since they are much smaller countries with regard to population. Iran spends less per capita on its military than any other country in the Persian Gulf region with the exception of the United Arab Emirates.


    Belief: Iran has threatened to attack Israel militarily and to "wipe it off the map."

    Reality: No Iranian leader in the executive has threatened an aggressive act of war on Israel, since this would contradict the doctrine of 'no first strike' to which the country has adhered. The Iranian president has explicitly said that Iran is not a threat to any country, including Israel.

    Belief: But didn't President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threaten to 'wipe Israel off the map?'

    Reality: President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad did quote Ayatollah Khomeini to the effect that "this Occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time" (in rezhim-e eshghalgar-i Qods bayad as safheh-e ruzgar mahv shavad). This was not a pledge to roll tanks and invade or to launch missiles, however. It is the expression of a hope that the regime will collapse, just as the Soviet Union did. It is not a threat to kill anyone at all.

    Belief: But aren't Iranians Holocaust deniers?

    Actuality: Some are, some aren't. Former president Mohammad Khatami has castigated Ahmadinejad for questioning the full extent of the Holocaust, which he called "the crime of Nazism." Many educated Iranians in the regime are perfectly aware of the horrors of the Holocaust. In any case, despite what propagandists imply, neither Holocaust denial (as wicked as that is) nor calling Israel names is the same thing as pledging to attack it militarily.

    Belief: Iran is like North Korea in having an active nuclear weapons program, and is the same sort of threat to the world.

    Actuality: Iran has a nuclear enrichment site at Natanz near Isfahan where it says it is trying to produce fuel for future civilian nuclear reactors to generate electricity. All Iranian leaders deny that this site is for weapons production, and the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly inspected it and found no weapons program. Iran is not being completely transparent, generating some doubts, but all the evidence the IAEA and the CIA can gather points to there not being a weapons program. The 2007 National Intelligence Estimate by 16 US intelligence agencies, including the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency, assessed with fair confidence that Iran has no nuclear weapons research program. This assessment was based on debriefings of defecting nuclear scientists, as well as on the documents they brought out, in addition to US signals intelligence from Iran. While Germany, Israel and recently the UK intelligence is more suspicious of Iranian intentions, all of them were badly wrong about Iraq's alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction and Germany in particular was taken in by Curveball, a drunk Iraqi braggart.

    Belief: The West recently discovered a secret Iranian nuclear weapons plant in a mountain near Qom.

    Actuality: Iran announced Monday a week ago to the International Atomic Energy Agency that it had begun work on a second, civilian nuclear enrichment facility near Qom. There are no nuclear materials at the site and it has not gone hot, so technically Iran is not in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, though it did break its word to the IAEA that it would immediately inform the UN of any work on a new facility. Iran has pledged to allow the site to be inspected regularly by the IAEA, and if it honors the pledge, as it largely has at the Natanz plant, then Iran cannot produce nuclear weapons at the site, since that would be detected by the inspectors. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted on Sunday that Iran could not produce nuclear weapons at Natanz precisely because it is being inspected. Yet American hawks have repeatedly demanded a strike on Natanz.


    Belief: The world should sanction Iran not only because of its nuclear enrichment research program but also because the current regime stole June's presidential election and brutally repressed the subsequent demonstrations.

    Actuality: Iran's reform movement is dead set against increased sanctions on Iran, which likely would not affect the regime, and would harm ordinary Iranians.

    Belief: Isn't the Iranian regime irrational and crazed, so that a doctrine of mutally assured destruction just would not work with them?

    Actuality: Iranian politicians are rational actors. If they were madmen, why haven't they invaded any of their neighbors? Saddam Hussein of Iraq invaded both Iran and Kuwait. Israel invaded its neighbors more than once. In contrast, Iran has not started any wars. Demonizing people by calling them unbalanced is an old propaganda trick. The US elite was once unalterably opposed to China having nuclear science because they believed the Chinese are intrinsically irrational. This kind of talk is a form of racism.

    Belief: The international community would not have put sanctions on Iran, and would not be so worried, if it were not a gathering nuclear threat.

    Actuality: The centrifuge technology that Iran is using to enrich uranium is open-ended. In the old days, you could tell which countries might want a nuclear bomb by whether they were building light water reactors (unsuitable for bomb-making) or heavy-water reactors (could be used to make a bomb). But with centrifuges, once you can enrich to 5% to fuel a civilian reactor, you could theoretically feed the material back through many times and enrich to 90% for a bomb. However, as long as centrifuge plants are being actively inspected, they cannot be used to make a bomb. The two danger signals would be if Iran threw out the inspectors or if it found a way to create a secret facility. The latter task would be extremely difficult, however, as demonstrated by the CIA's discovery of the Qom facility construction in 2006 from satellite photos. Nuclear installations, especially centrifuge ones, consume a great deal of water, construction materiel, and so forth, so that constructing one in secret is a tall order. In any case, you can't attack and destroy a country because you have an intuition that they might be doing something illegal. You need some kind of proof. Moreover, Israel, Pakistan and India are all much worse citizens of the globe than Iran, since they refused to sign the NPT and then went for broke to get a bomb; and nothing at all has been done to any of them by the UNSC.



  2. #2
    5 Star Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,161

    Default Re: Top Things you Think You Know about Iran that aren't Tru

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben

    Belief: The West recently discovered a secret Iranian nuclear weapons plant in a mountain near Qom.

    Actuality: Iran announced Monday a week ago to the International Atomic Energy Agency that it had begun work on a second, civilian nuclear enrichment facility near Qom.
    Iran announced about the nuclear enrichment facility near Qom, ONLY after they found out that the west discovered it.

    a small tiny fact that Juan Cole choosed to ignore.

    another tiny fact is that site near Qom was opened 2 years ago.......



  3. #3
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Fort Myers
    Posts
    28

    Default

    If the nuclear reactor is going to be use for energy; Why are they testing missiles capables of carrying nuclear warheads? Why the nuclear facilty is at a close proximity to a military installation?
    Reality is there are better and most suitable means of energy.
    It is what it is!


    I have witnessed the beauty of shemales all over the world

  4. #4
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    95

    Default

    Thanks for posting this. I think Iran gets a bad rep when it is totally dumb to hate on them.


    Don't you just love the scales of justice?

  5. #5
    Banned!
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default

    FU



  6. #6
    Junior Poster effigyc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Hmm. definatley food for thought. I don't think world leaders would be so consistantly concerned with Iran if there was no actual threat, but it's probably not as bad as the sensational media has made it out to be.



  7. #7
    Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    231

    Default

    Keep drinking kool aid. I personally love Iranian people, they are the most westernized Muslim country right behind Turkey. If we were more friendly towards them and more aggressive towards Saudi Arabia where everyone there wants to kill us the world would probably be a better place. However, the government of Iran is the major problem with the country as seen with the election process in June. Oh yeah stop hating on Israel. Can't we all just get along?



  8. #8
    Professional Poster alyssats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    cum and get me ;)
    Posts
    1,487

    Default

    Iranian guys are one of the most delicious guys in the world. Many of my neighbors are from Iran they just sometimes knock on my door whenever they want to suck my cock and fukc uhmmm feels so good



  9. #9
    Junior Poster barefootjoe69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alyssats
    Iranian guys are one of the most delicious guys in the world. Many of my neighbors are from Iran they just sometimes knock on my door whenever they want to suck my cock and fukc uhmmm feels so good
    Wish I was your neighbor!!



  10. #10
    Veteran Poster freak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    S Florida
    Posts
    617

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alyssats
    Iranian guys are one of the most delicious guys in the world. Many of my neighbors are from Iran they just sometimes knock on my door whenever they want to suck my cock and fukc uhmmm feels so good
    I would lend you all the cream and sugar you need, and you can return the favor too


    Even though this isn't a petting zoo, you can still stroke my cock if you want.

    If the zombie apocalypse happens in Vegas... will it stay in Vegas?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •