Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40
  1. #11
    Rookie Poster ScottyBabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Snowy Scotland
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Of course the "Pulsating Universe" theory just puts the question back in time.....what prompted the first pulse?
    I think that's my favourite part of this kind of discussion, MacShreach.

    i love the idea that there is no "first", no beginning. maybe this pre-concieved notion, that we as humans have, that everything has to have a start, duration and end doesn't apply when it comes to the universe (or indeed universes).

    this idea, which through discussing with people and noticing the majority think the same, that "timeless" is non-existent is perhaps proof that maybe we're just not supposed to know what happened, that it's beyond our grasp.

    on the other side of the coin, you could say that this world of ours is such a teeny, tiny miniscule part of this system that is doesn't matter what happened or what we think as we have no consequence upon it. so lets just have fun and get pissed!

    that why i'm with you jaycanuk, i think some booze needs to flow before the words do!



  2. #12
    Professional Poster NYBURBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Anywhere but here
    Posts
    1,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MacShreach
    Quote Originally Posted by NYBURBS
    I would say it was dark, but then again darkness is something and yet there was supposedly nothing.
    Black holes are dark because there gravity is such that light itself is unable to escape. There must have been a point before the Big Bang when all matter and energy that exists was collected together, and the gravity of this mind-boggling mass would be such that the same would surely be true, so yes...total darkness and silence.

    Nothing.
    Yea but is darkness something? We perceive it, so therefore it's not a stretch to say it is something. We're limited in our understanding by what we can perceive, so it's kinda tough to say either way. It's just one of those things that can cause you to go round and round in your head until you go crazy lol.



  3. #13
    Platinum Poster MacShreach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    5,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NYBURBS
    Quote Originally Posted by MacShreach
    Quote Originally Posted by NYBURBS
    I would say it was dark, but then again darkness is something and yet there was supposedly nothing.
    Black holes are dark because there gravity is such that light itself is unable to escape. There must have been a point before the Big Bang when all matter and energy that exists was collected together, and the gravity of this mind-boggling mass would be such that the same would surely be true, so yes...total darkness and silence.

    Nothing.
    Yea but is darkness something?
    Total darkness is a complete absence of light....You can't call an absence "something" in a tangible sense, although you could in a conceptual or philosophical sense. But the OP asked about what it would look like; there might be something there, but in the total absence of light, we would see nothing. And so that's what it would look like.



  4. #14
    Junior Poster droog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    434

    Default

    interesting thoughts guys... but perhaps our universe is just a speck of dust sitting on someone's window sill inside of a much bigger universe... maybe when we get the answers in our next lives, we will be saying, wow, that's so obvious, i cant believe i couldn't figure it out!



  5. #15
    Platinum Poster MacShreach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    5,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droog
    interesting thoughts guys... but perhaps our universe is just a speck of dust sitting on someone's window sill inside of a much bigger universe... maybe when we get the answers in our next lives, we will be saying, wow, that's so obvious, i cant believe i couldn't figure it out!
    I want some of what he's smokin!



  6. #16
    Junior Poster droog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    434

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MacShreach
    I want some of what he's smokin!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	strawberry_149.jpg 
Views:	158 
Size:	26.9 KB 
ID:	238418  



  7. #17
    Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottyBabe
    Of course the "Pulsating Universe" theory just puts the question back in time.....what prompted the first pulse?
    I think that's my favourite part of this kind of discussion, MacShreach.

    i love the idea that there is no "first", no beginning. maybe this pre-concieved notion, that we as humans have, that everything has to have a start, duration and end doesn't apply when it comes to the universe (or indeed universes).

    this idea, which through discussing with people and noticing the majority think the same, that "timeless" is non-existent is perhaps proof that maybe we're just not supposed to know what happened, that it's beyond our grasp.

    on the other side of the coin, you could say that this world of ours is such a teeny, tiny miniscule part of this system that is doesn't matter what happened or what we think as we have no consequence upon it. so lets just have fun and get pissed!

    that why i'm with you jaycanuk, i think some booze needs to flow before the words do!
    This is the best answer in my opinion. Humans are not intelligent enough to comprehend or come up with the answer to that question.

    No human will ever know the answer while alive, therefore it is not a question to be asked, technically.



  8. #18
    Silver Poster hippifried's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,968

    Default

    Never say never. Well... Except you never know what you don't know.

    Now I'm with Scotty on the time abstract, but the question was: "Before Existence..." The question itself assumes a reality of the time abstract with the word "before", but it's not necessary to include time in the answer.

    If nothing exists, there's nothing to perceive. There's nothing for light to reflect off of. There's nothing to generate light. There's no light. There's nothing to look at anyway. It all sounds exceedingly dull. Think I'll just hang around & see if I can't get involved in a big bang.


    "You can pick your friends & you can pick your nose, but you can't wipe your friends off on your saddle."
    ~ Kinky Friedman ~

  9. #19
    Hung Angel Platinum Poster trish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    The United Fuckin' States of America
    Posts
    13,898

    Default

    what did life, as we know it, look like, before anything existed?
    What did life look like TO WHOM, before anything existed? Perhaps the intent of of original question is, “If someone were there to observe it, what would it had looked like before anything existed?” But to that question one would have to counter, “Where would that observer have been, if nothing…not even space, with its three distinct dimensions…existed?” There would’ve have been no place to be. Worse, there was no time before time. More accurately, “before” has no meaning in such a context. At this point words fail us and we stumble over them.


    "...I no longer believe that people's secrets are defined and communicable, or their feelings full-blown and easy to recognize."_Alice Munro, Chaddeleys and Flemings.

    "...the order in creation which you see is that which you have put there, like a string in a maze, so that you shall not lose your way". _Judge Holden, Cormac McCarthy's, BLOOD MERIDIAN.

  10. #20
    5 Star Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    2,215

    Default

    The answer to this is. Suppose you existed in your own little parallel universe and have a great view of the universe before the big bang. What would you see?

    Nothing, because there would be no light, and no space-time for the light to travel through to get to you. (Remember the big bag created not just matter and light filling in some void, it created the very space-time we live in itself. It is often thought of as an explosion but it really wasn't.)

    Supposing you could get inside the tiny point that the universe banged out of what would you see? Again nothing, because based on the best theories we have the universe was so compact that gravity, E&M (light) and the nuclear forces were all unified into one force. There wasn't even light as we know it. Nothing we know of could live in our universe.

    The only thing left is to consider all the different types of parallel universes that could exist, Now about those we can know nothing for sure.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •