Results 41 to 50 of 55
-
04-20-2009 #41
Internet hardasses are LOL-tastic.
Those who anger you control you
I Love music, any kind of music ~ The O'Jays
-
04-20-2009 #42
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- united snakes of america
- Posts
- 614
Originally Posted by phobun
-
04-20-2009 #43
Re: Are we watching people spread the HIV virus...
Originally Posted by magicone
So you are almost, almost? certain, almost? but your not certain, right? Then you go on an point out a few sites that you are almost certain about, but your not certain, but you'll name them anyway and accuse them of spreading diseases.
It is really irresponsible to be spreading rumors that these sites are using people with diseases. I would guess a legal term would be slander on your part. And if these sites got upset enough they could sue you for it.
Even though this isn't a petting zoo, you can still stroke my cock if you want.
If the zombie apocalypse happens in Vegas... will it stay in Vegas?
-
04-20-2009 #44
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Posts
- 646
Re: Are we watching people spread the HIV virus...
Originally Posted by freak
GET BACK MOTHERFUCKER YOU DON'T KNOW ME LIKE THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
04-20-2009 #45
Re: Are we watching people spread the HIV virus...
Originally Posted by keepingitreal470
I'm sorry your dick is bigger than your brain, I really am.
-
04-20-2009 #46
@ at the prick with the attitude again
....And if you really think anything Magicone or I said was actionable, then you are even more stupid than you at first appear. And man, that is really, really, REALLY, REALLY stupid.
Maybe you should finish school before you start trying to think grown-up.
Barebacking is dangerous and a known vector for the transmission of HIV/AIDS. Sue me, cuntbrain.
-
04-20-2009 #47
Re: Are we watching people spread the HIV virus...
Originally Posted by freak
So you are almost, almost? certain, almost? but your not certain, right? Then you go on an point out a few sites that you are almost certain about, but your not certain, but you'll name them anyway and accuse them of spreading diseases.
It is really irresponsible to be spreading rumors that these sites are using people with diseases. I would guess a legal term would be slander on your part.
And if these sites got upset enough they could sue you for it.
Oh yes, and frankly, if barebacking sites get closed, so much the better.
And a final thought before coffee--one of the joys of the internet is that people are free to have and share their opinions without having to take seriously threats from moronic thugs who see intimidation, either by physical attack or "legal action" as a legitimate method of getting their own way.
Now fuck off back to school the pair of you.
-
04-20-2009 #48
A few questions for KIR470:
How old are you man? You always seem to want to resolve silly HA disputes with your fists. OK, so let's say someone decided to take you up on it, how do you know the other party will not show up with a knife, or worse, a gun? And if they show up with no weapons, you are willing to risk being injured and/or arrested over some silly shit someone wrote on HA? How smart is that? Are you willing to risk your health and acting career over some stupid shit like this? smh.
Sometimes it takes a real man, or should I say, an adult, to know when to walk away from a fight, especially an internet fight. Have a nice day.
Originally Posted by keepingitreal470Originally Posted by keepingitreal470
Originally Posted by suckseed
-
04-20-2009 #49
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 113
"Furthermore, his right to his opinion is a Constitutional one in the US"
Not to nitpick, but this is not true. Nowhere in the Bill of Rights is it written that someone has the right to their opinion.
The closest you may come to that conclusion is in the First Amendment which states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The implication is that you are free to speak, which presumably includes your opinion. However, the courts have ruled that this is not absolute. For example, you may not yell "Fire!" in a crowded theatre without consequence.
-
04-20-2009 #50Originally Posted by keepingitreal470
IDK y people get all riled up over shit like this. These morals and all this shit needs to really GTFO. It's is people choice to go in her and shoot these films. Now as long as deception isn't being used why should anybody care who shoots BB and who doesn't. Ya'll sound like sum of these bullshit politicians running around tryin to run other people lives.
Originally Posted by tjinla2001
I AM A GUY NOT A TRANSSEXUAL!
I AM A GUY NOT A TRANSSEXUAL!