Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 345678
Results 71 to 74 of 74

Thread: Windows 7

  1. #71
    Professional Poster scubaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luvsthetrannys
    various win7 beta builds have been around the usual torrents/newsgroups for awhile and it's still a fail-OS, although anything is better than Vista I guess.

    incredibly the password hashing scheme is the same one used since XP. the hashing is not salted, which allows easy recovery from readily available dictionaries full of of collected password hashes anybody can download and use instantly guaranteeing more nigerian spam botnets and trojans for years to come.

    the UNIX crypt man page says salting password hashes to prevent this has been implemented since 1975. gj microsoft being more obsolete than I am old
    Here is the real info

    But things are different with newer versions of Windows. Windows 2000 and XP passwords can now be up to 127 characters in length and so 14 characters is no longer a limit. Furthermore, one little known fact discovered by Urity of SecurityFriday.com is that if a password is fifteen characters or longer, Windows does not even store the LanMan hash correctly. This actually protects you from brute-force attacks against the weak algorithm used in those hashes. If your password is 15 characters or longer, Windows stores the constant AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE as your LM hash, which is equivalent to a null password. And since your password is obviously not null, attempts to crack that hash will fail.


    "Do you remember V. P. Dick Cheney "
    'YES, I DO. I use to call him 'TAINT'.
    "Taint? Why did you call him that?"
    'Because in every picture he was between Bush and Colin'

  2. #72
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sector 001
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scubaman
    attempts to crack that hash will fail.
    lol. try this, install Win7, make a bunch of accounts. make two accounts with the same password, then use the free program Cain to dump the hashes. notice the two accounts with the same passwords also have the same hashes, thus allowing easy decryption. this also worked on a Win2008 64bit server datacenter install using fgdump to gather the hashes



  3. #73
    Professional Poster scubaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luvsthetrannys
    Quote Originally Posted by scubaman
    attempts to crack that hash will fail.
    lol. try this, install Win7, make a bunch of accounts. make two accounts with the same password, then use the free program Cain to dump the hashes. notice the two accounts with the same passwords also have the same hashes, thus allowing easy decryption. this also worked on a Win2008 64bit server datacenter install using fgdump to gather the hashes
    Dude read

    If your password is 15 characters or longer, Windows stores the constant AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE as your LM hash, which is equivalent to a null password. And since your password is obviously not null, attempts to crack that hash will fail.


    "Do you remember V. P. Dick Cheney "
    'YES, I DO. I use to call him 'TAINT'.
    "Taint? Why did you call him that?"
    'Because in every picture he was between Bush and Colin'

  4. #74
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sector 001
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scubaman
    Dude read
    cain and fgdump don't care about this magical null password hash that doesn't exist. try it yourself, make a password any length (you can't type in a 127 character pword during install, you have to use the reset password dialog box), rip the hashes then decode with numerous available hash tables.

    the security and cryptography lab @ EPFL in Switzerland even had a site up in 2003 showing they could crack any alpha-numeric combination up to 127 characters in an average time of 13 seconds if you cut+paste in the hash values. since there's only so many symbols that can be used I'm sure there's a ton of available hash tables over the years for those too. obsolete indeed



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •