Page 1 of 8 123456 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 74

Thread: Windows 7

  1. #1
    Banned again for being a jizzmop, oh well! Gold Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,911

    Default Windows 7

    Microsoft has apparently realized what dopes they are, and is prepared to re-release Windows XP, only this time calling it the wildly creative: "7". As opposed to Vista, their are rumors that this OP might actually work.

    Anyone who downloads "7" tomorrow, please post your reviews.



  2. #2
    Silver Poster hippifried's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    3,968

    Default

    Isn't Vista just XP with a bunch of added junk that you can't get rid of?


    "You can pick your friends & you can pick your nose, but you can't wipe your friends off on your saddle."
    ~ Kinky Friedman ~

  3. #3
    Banned again for being a jizzmop, oh well! Gold Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,911

    Default

    I checked out Vista for about two minutes when it was first released. It was very much like visiting a trinket bizarre in Mogadishu.

    "Holy crap, look at all this junk I don't need!"

    I'll be interested in seeing peoples reactions to "7" tomorrow.




  4. #4
    Platinum Poster JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    52° 4' 60 N, 4° 17' 60 E
    Posts
    8,824

    Default

    how much is it, and what are the minimum system requirements?

    sorry I usually know all of this, but OSX has been wonderful to me the last few months..........


    snɯıʇdo snʇoʇ soʌ oloʌ

  5. #5
    Banned again for being a jizzmop, oh well! Gold Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,911

    Default

    I haven't bothered to check. A Windows release is generally worthless until Service Pack 2. I think they are released early to simply keep RAM sales up to speed. I honestly have no problems with XP now, though.



  6. #6
    Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    202

    Default

    It's just a beta release.


    I don't smile much

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel
    how much is it, and what are the minimum system requirements?

    sorry I usually know all of this, but OSX has been wonderful to me the last few months..........
    According to Microsoft, no new kernel is going to be introduced along with Windows 7.
    The kernel architecture and compensation model introduced with Windows Vista has been
    refined, and optimized for better performance. Basically, that's it. Microsoft's design
    goal for Windows 7 is that it will run on the recommended hardware that's specified for
    Windows Vista along with full software compatibility with Vista.



  8. #8
    Veteran Poster Tepres's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    723

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hannibal Lecter
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel
    how much is it, and what are the minimum system requirements?

    sorry I usually know all of this, but OSX has been wonderful to me the last few months..........
    According to Microsoft, no new kernel is going to be introduced along with Windows 7.
    The kernel architecture and compensation model introduced with Windows Vista has been
    refined, and optimized for better performance. Basically, that's it. Microsoft's design
    goal for Windows 7 is that it will run on the recommended hardware that's specified for
    Windows Vista along with full software compatibility with Vista.
    That's similar to what I read. The transition from Vista to 7 is suppose to be much easier than the transition from XP to Vista was.


    ...stir it up and pass it around.


  9. #9
    Silver Poster slinky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    What's the opposite of "admirer"?
    Posts
    3,107

    Default

    Firstly, all this info is coming from MS, and they have never told the truth about anything when it comes to their operating systems.

    I was looking on Dell's site in the not-to-distant past and the TOP upcharge option was to get rid of Vista and get Windows XP instead. What does that tell you?


    Just because you don't know about it, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist: http://www.hungangels.com/board/view...=asc&start=158

  10. #10
    Platinum Poster JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    52° 4' 60 N, 4° 17' 60 E
    Posts
    8,824

    Default

    my gripe with MS is a weak one based on how I'd use the machine

    Linux allows folks to run mediocre equipment and get decent results

    MS needs you to have double whatever they recommend in order to truly be happy

    in other words: if they said you needed 1 gig of anything you better get 2
    if they said your graphics card needed 128mb minimum you better have 256 or even better 512

    while those specs are nothing these days I remember when they were a headache ( a few years ago) for the average user......

    nonetheless I'll be installing 7 on my MBP come midnight and dumping the ever failing Vista

    Vista was Windows ME quadrupled IMO, good riddance

    viva la OSX


    snɯıʇdo snʇoʇ soʌ oloʌ

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •