Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 41
  1. #31
    Professional Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Potomac, Maryland
    Posts
    1,269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louie Damazo
    Quote Originally Posted by fitz207
    So many cameramen have a problem shooting the girls facial expression at the time orgasm. I'm not that interested in the cumshot as much as am in her facial expression during orgasm. closeups of cocks are not needed so much. A sample vidcap from PK. This is why he has a future in the business.
    Thats why i use 2 cams

    Some guys REALLY enjoy the ejaculation, others like see models face and ejaculation. I can please all doing with 2 cams and NO MORE Fish Eye len
    2 cams are always welcomed, that way you miss nothing.



  2. #32
    Professional Poster Louie Damazo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    1,266

    Default

    Thats idea man

    Remember that we introduce it years ago and customers gave us great feedbacks thats why we keep

    Talk with us is great EXACT for this. Stop what u guys dont like and keep what please u. Trust me, we are listen

    L D



  3. #33
    Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    689

    Default

    Seanchai took a very VERY good position on the situation. As a professional photographer I realize that it isnt the easiest thing in the world to take pictures that EVERYONE is happy with, so you have to shoot with reguards to what you think that a majority of people find your pictures apealing. Its already been said that the fish eye was used to get a shot that included feet, cock, ass, face, the whole package LOL. Don't blame the photog for trying something different, and it didnt work out. Cool. Its getting rectified, so leave it be


    Anyway, I have found that [even though it sounds ass backwards in theory] that using a wide macro lense has given me a wider shot and it gives a very small amount of distortion around the edges. I dont know sh*t about shooting video, so maybe that wouldnt help.

    I can also vouch for Grooby being one of few places that the customers get what they want. Anyone remember the slow motion cum shots? LOL



  4. #34
    Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    689

    Default

    Seanchai took a very VERY good position on the situation. As a professional photographer I realize that it isnt the easiest thing in the world to take pictures that EVERYONE is happy with, so you have to shoot with reguards to what you think that a majority of people find your pictures apealing. Its already been said that the fish eye was used to get a shot that included feet, cock, ass, face, the whole package LOL. Don't blame the photog for trying something different, and it didnt work out. Cool. Its getting rectified, so leave it be


    Anyway, I have found that [even though it sounds ass backwards in theory] that using a wide macro lense has given me a wider shot and it gives a very small amount of distortion around the edges. I dont know sh*t about shooting video, so maybe that wouldnt help.

    I can also vouch for Grooby being one of few places that the customers get what they want. Anyone remember the slow motion cum shots? LOL



  5. #35
    Professional Poster Louie Damazo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    1,266

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LBCDO
    Seanchai took a very VERY good position on the situation. As a professional photographer I realize that it isnt the easiest thing in the world to take pictures that EVERYONE is happy with, so you have to shoot with reguards to what you think that a majority of people find your pictures apealing. Its already been said that the fish eye was used to get a shot that included feet, cock, ass, face, the whole package LOL. Don't blame the photog for trying something different, and it didnt work out. Cool. Its getting rectified, so leave it be


    Anyway, I have found that [even though it sounds ass backwards in theory] that using a wide macro lense has given me a wider shot and it gives a very small amount of distortion around the edges. I dont know sh*t about shooting video, so maybe that wouldnt help.

    I can also vouch for Grooby being one of few places that the customers get what they want. Anyone remember the slow motion cum shots? LOL
    Thats what i was talking about

    We tryed different ideas, some doesnt work and we listen u giving up that.

    About Slow Motion i still have who likes and who dont then i keep it in strong ones only



    L D



  6. #36
    Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    not here
    Posts
    7,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seanchai
    Jen - most of the tgirls I know love to see retouched photos of other girls or themselves - however, this isn't the most sellable type of porn. We retouch lightly but we present the models how they are. That's our business - other sites may do different - our style is working for us and our members.

    Thanks all.
    Drinking the vino Danielle, thanks!
    i was talking in general more then anything

    i prefer the way playboy shoots and presents its product over the way oui does/did

    but i think in the ts industry... some girls REALLY need that extra artistic touch... and if a company isnt willing to alter features to be more flattering they should work w/ photographers that understand angles, lighting, and makeup

    or at least encourage they learn



  7. #37
    Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    not here
    Posts
    7,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seanchai
    Jen - most of the tgirls I know love to see retouched photos of other girls or themselves - however, this isn't the most sellable type of porn. We retouch lightly but we present the models how they are. That's our business - other sites may do different - our style is working for us and our members.

    Thanks all.
    Drinking the vino Danielle, thanks!
    i was talking in general more then anything

    i prefer the way playboy shoots and presents its product over the way oui does/did

    but i think in the ts industry... some girls REALLY need that extra artistic touch... and if a company isnt willing to alter features to be more flattering they should work w/ photographers that understand angles, lighting, and makeup

    or at least encourage they learn



  8. #38
    A Very Grooby Guy Platinum Poster GroobySteven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    17,633

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsntx
    Quote Originally Posted by seanchai
    Jen - most of the tgirls I know love to see retouched photos of other girls or themselves - however, this isn't the most sellable type of porn. We retouch lightly but we present the models how they are. That's our business - other sites may do different - our style is working for us and our members.

    Thanks all.
    Drinking the vino Danielle, thanks!
    i was talking in general more then anything

    i prefer the way playboy shoots and presents its product over the way oui does/did

    but i think in the ts industry... some girls REALLY need that extra artistic touch... and if a company isnt willing to alter features to be more flattering they should work w/ photographers that understand angles, lighting, and makeup

    or at least encourage they learn
    Not sure who "oui" is? Playboy had very little wankability which is why Hustler really knew how to do it. It's also why the Hustler brand is probably stronger now than Playboy is and why Playboy is losing so much money.
    I love artistic nudes ... but that's completely different business from erotica/porn. Our photographers work to get the best from the models in all terms - and that includes a light touch up but it's not about the models per se but about what the customers are looking for.



  9. #39

    Default

    i love that camera waat do you mean



  10. #40
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    95

    Default

    Oh my god that looks horrible. My suspicion is that whoever shot that was just trying to make the girls appear 'bigger'. Why else use something that distorts and gives a lot of its viewers headaches. What's next? Cloverfield Tgirls?



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •