Results 31 to 40 of 41
-
01-02-2009 #31
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Potomac, Maryland
- Posts
- 1,269
Originally Posted by Louie Damazo
-
01-02-2009 #32
Thats idea man
Remember that we introduce it years ago and customers gave us great feedbacks thats why we keep
Talk with us is great EXACT for this. Stop what u guys dont like and keep what please u. Trust me, we are listen
L D
-
01-02-2009 #33
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
- Posts
- 689
Seanchai took a very VERY good position on the situation. As a professional photographer I realize that it isnt the easiest thing in the world to take pictures that EVERYONE is happy with, so you have to shoot with reguards to what you think that a majority of people find your pictures apealing. Its already been said that the fish eye was used to get a shot that included feet, cock, ass, face, the whole package LOL. Don't blame the photog for trying something different, and it didnt work out. Cool. Its getting rectified, so leave it be
Anyway, I have found that [even though it sounds ass backwards in theory] that using a wide macro lense has given me a wider shot and it gives a very small amount of distortion around the edges. I dont know sh*t about shooting video, so maybe that wouldnt help.
I can also vouch for Grooby being one of few places that the customers get what they want. Anyone remember the slow motion cum shots? LOL
-
01-02-2009 #34
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
- Posts
- 689
Seanchai took a very VERY good position on the situation. As a professional photographer I realize that it isnt the easiest thing in the world to take pictures that EVERYONE is happy with, so you have to shoot with reguards to what you think that a majority of people find your pictures apealing. Its already been said that the fish eye was used to get a shot that included feet, cock, ass, face, the whole package LOL. Don't blame the photog for trying something different, and it didnt work out. Cool. Its getting rectified, so leave it be
Anyway, I have found that [even though it sounds ass backwards in theory] that using a wide macro lense has given me a wider shot and it gives a very small amount of distortion around the edges. I dont know sh*t about shooting video, so maybe that wouldnt help.
I can also vouch for Grooby being one of few places that the customers get what they want. Anyone remember the slow motion cum shots? LOL
-
01-03-2009 #35Originally Posted by LBCDO
We tryed different ideas, some doesnt work and we listen u giving up that.
About Slow Motion i still have who likes and who dont then i keep it in strong ones only
L D
-
01-03-2009 #36
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- not here
- Posts
- 7,128
Originally Posted by seanchai
i prefer the way playboy shoots and presents its product over the way oui does/did
but i think in the ts industry... some girls REALLY need that extra artistic touch... and if a company isnt willing to alter features to be more flattering they should work w/ photographers that understand angles, lighting, and makeup
or at least encourage they learn
wanna see what i'm up to this week?
http://www.youtube.com/tsntx
http://www.gayborhood.tv/shows.cfm?view=2
-
01-03-2009 #37
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- not here
- Posts
- 7,128
Originally Posted by seanchai
i prefer the way playboy shoots and presents its product over the way oui does/did
but i think in the ts industry... some girls REALLY need that extra artistic touch... and if a company isnt willing to alter features to be more flattering they should work w/ photographers that understand angles, lighting, and makeup
or at least encourage they learn
wanna see what i'm up to this week?
http://www.youtube.com/tsntx
http://www.gayborhood.tv/shows.cfm?view=2
-
01-03-2009 #38Originally Posted by tsntx
I love artistic nudes ... but that's completely different business from erotica/porn. Our photographers work to get the best from the models in all terms - and that includes a light touch up but it's not about the models per se but about what the customers are looking for.
-
01-11-2009 #39
-
05-10-2009 #40
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 95
Oh my god that looks horrible. My suspicion is that whoever shot that was just trying to make the girls appear 'bigger'. Why else use something that distorts and gives a lot of its viewers headaches. What's next? Cloverfield Tgirls?