Results 1 to 9 of 9
Pondering Transsexual/Shemale Pornography
Feminists often argue that pornography degrades women and promotes violence against them.
So what would the argument be against Shemale Pornography? Would the opposition still hold because of the feminine depictions in such films?
Or would it simply be dismissed as deviant and thus not apply? Exactly how would Transsexual Porn influence this debate?
File this under: "Things that make you go Hmmm"...
Get on yer...
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- South Shall Rise Again
FEMINISTS SHOULD BE HANGED BY THEIR BALLS....
You are cordially invited to toss my salad
Re: Pondering Transsexual/Shemale Pornography
I think that the feminist community is no longer solidly anti-porn. The last 20 years have seen an explosion in "feminist porn" and support for sex-workers by many leaders of the feminist movement.
The Andrea Dworkins of the world hold a lot less sway these days than they used too.
There's a lot of degrading and violent TS porn, websites and films built on it in fact, but I haven't seen any major protests yet. As far as mainstream, Candida Royalle lightened things up and took some of the stigma from porn: http://www.candidaroyalle.com/ Personally, one of my favorites in the industry is Kink.com based in San Francisco at the old Armory. One of their sites is TS Seduction and you may have heard of Wired Pussy, Hogtied, etc. I love the way they handle taboo subjects and hold nothing back without worrying about fringe group reactions.
You hit the nail on the head. Ironically, most of the people I know personally who buy it are biological women and they're lifestyle submissives.
Originally Posted by braveman
Re: Pondering Transsexual/Shemale PornographyOriginally Posted by tsmandy
10-22-2008 #7Originally Posted by envivision
LOL I see Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm . . . .
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
Maybe that's because Andrea Dworkin died. Not that I think it would have made any real difference.
"Some girls' mothers are bigger than other girls' mothers....."