yeah, CLINTON QUITS

[Quinn]

Why becuase I can and will. I dont think Barack is ready to be President at this point nor do I agree with alot of his views. Hillary was and is the strongest person to be President. My options then are to do the following: not vote, Vote for Barack, Vote for McCain, or write in...........At this point I feel McCain is the stronger on International affairs and has more experience. Therefore my vote is for McCain.

I totally agree with this, Obama wasn't good at being a senator he was in charge of the iraq peace group and hardly attended any meetings, he is just not ready. How is he going to handle being President if he can't handle being a Senator?????????????????????????????? However I would not vote for Mccain.

What exactly is the "iraq peace group," and how was Obama in charge of it?

As for handling being a senator, you should look into Hillary's failure to keep her promise to Upstate New York. What happened to her detailed plan to create 200,000 jobs for Upstate New York during her six-year term? Oh, that’s right, not only were no new jobs created whatsoever – the region actually lost 32,000 jobs. The greatest irony is that Clinton herself bragged about bringing Tata Consulting Services to Buffalo. For the record, that’s a company that helped companies in Upstate New York outsource many of those lost jobs to places like India.

I can’t say this comes as a surprise. Clinton has a childlike grasp of even the most fundamental, basic economic issues (and, yes, it’s even worse than McCain’s, and that’s saying something). Maybe she can impress us all with more economically ruinous ideas about a 5-year interest rate freeze.

-Quinn

[MrsKellyPierce]

Why becuase I can and will. I dont think Barack is ready to be President at this point nor do I agree with alot of his views. Hillary was and is the strongest person to be President. My options then are to do the following: not vote, Vote for Barack, Vote for McCain, or write in...........At this point I feel McCain is the stronger on International affairs and has more experience. Therefore my vote is for McCain.

I totally agree with this, Obama wasn't good at being a senator he was in charge of the iraq peace group and hardly attended any meetings, he is just not ready. How is he going to handle being President if he can't handle being a Senator?????????????????????????????? However I would not vote for Mccain.

What exactly is the "iraq peace group," and how was Obama in charge of it?

As for handling being a senator, you should look into Hillary's failure to keep her promise to Upstate New York. What happened to her detailed plan to create 200,000 jobs for Upstate New York during her six-year term? Oh, that’s right, not only were no new jobs created whatsoever – the region actually lost 32,000 jobs. The greatest irony is that Clinton herself bragged about bringing Tata Consulting Services to Buffalo. For the record, that’s a company that helped companies in Upstate New York outsource many of those lost jobs to places like India.

I can’t say this comes as a surprise. Clinton has a childlike grasp of even the most fundamental, basic economic issues (and, yes, it’s even worse than McCain’s, and that’s saying something). Maybe she can impress us all with more economically ruinous ideas about a 5-year interest rate freeze.

-Quinn

Hmm strange Quinn, everyone is always talking about how great Hilary is in New York? And how well its doing. Can you give these news articles so I can read them.


He and a group of other men and women were supposed to find ways and ideas to show Iraqis how to cope with life after their freedom, get more on our side to want freedom, etc.

[Tomfurbs]

From my tenuous grasp of US politics, I would have thought that Hillary is the only candidate with the know-how or experience to deal with this huge economic crisis that EVERYONE the world over is feeling.

My finances will be shit for the next five years because of unscrupulous US bankers, so I would like someone with at least some vague financial history to be in charge. Even though Hillary's history is shakey in this regard, at least she has a history, unlike Mccain or Obama.

My ideal scenario (doesn't matter of course, being a limey bastard), would be Hillary for 4 years top put some kind of a salve of the money matters, with Obama following for two terms.

Still, as someone who has been follwing this with somewhat of an objective eye, I'm at a loss to understand just what reforms Obama is proposing to implement this change he talks about.

[MrsKellyPierce]

From my tenuous grasp of US politics, I would have thought that Hillary is the only candidate with the know-how or experience to deal with this huge economic crisis that EVERYONE the world over is feeling.

My finances will be shit for the next five years because of unscrupulous US bankers, so I would like someone with at least some vague financial history to be in charge. Even though Hillary's history is shakey in this regard, at least she has a history, unlike Mccain or Obama.

My ideal scenario (doesn't matter of course, being a limey bastard), would be Hillary for 4 years top put some kind of a salve of the money matters, with Obama following for two terms.

Still, as someone who has been follwing this with somewhat of an objective eye, I'm at a loss to understand just what reforms Obama is proposing to implement this change he talks about.

Thank you for another point on why she is a better candidate! I totally forgot about this!

[needsum]

"In the four years since the insectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missle delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Quaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."



Anyone know who said this? I'll give you a hint-- it was in 2002, proir to the Iraq war.

Well, since I have yet to have any takers, it was Then senator (D, NY) Hillary Clinton from Oct 10, 2002. Back then, and all the way back to 1998, the Democratic Big-wigs were spewing venom about how much of a threat Saddam Hussein was and how he needed to be stopped before he was able to secure WMD's.

It is the tip of the iceberg showing just how fucked up our political system is and how people will say anything in order to look the part. Look how quickly all the "Dem's" turned on Bush, saying he lied about the WMD's. We took 13 months before going into Iraq, giving Hussein all that time to hide the shit that he supposedly had, that everyone claimed to have known about for years.

Here's my All time fucking favorite:

"I actually voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it" HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Fuxking dumbass two-faced jerkoff . . .

[BrendaQG]

@Kelly

"AP is an Obama supporter". AP is a HUGE INTERNATIONAL news agency. Do you really think that thousands of people are behind Obama. C'mon. The voters have spoken and Obama is the winner. Fair and square.

As for those factory workers (This will be a bit of a history lesson for those who are not from the great state so listen up.)....

Would a senator , or senator Allen Keyes have done better? I don't think so. Those downstate towns were based around one factory or one industry and when they were no longer economically viable they went away. NO politician could have prevented that. * That's what you and I are really talking about. Our choice was between Obama and total idiots.



* FYI Jack Ryan had to drop out because of a sex scandal his Ex-wife. [urlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeri_Ryan=]Jeri Ryan who played 7 of 9 in Star Trek Voyager, accused him of trying to get her to go to swingers clubs. So psyched he was at being married to a woman like that. (she is built like a brick shit house as they say in the country)

[Quinn]

Why becuase I can and will. I dont think Barack is ready to be President at this point nor do I agree with alot of his views. Hillary was and is the strongest person to be President. My options then are to do the following: not vote, Vote for Barack, Vote for McCain, or write in...........At this point I feel McCain is the stronger on International affairs and has more experience. Therefore my vote is for McCain.

I totally agree with this, Obama wasn't good at being a senator he was in charge of the iraq peace group and hardly attended any meetings, he is just not ready. How is he going to handle being President if he can't handle being a Senator?????????????????????????????? However I would not vote for Mccain.

What exactly is the "iraq peace group," and how was Obama in charge of it?

As for handling being a senator, you should look into Hillary's failure to keep her promise to Upstate New York. What happened to her detailed plan to create 200,000 jobs for Upstate New York during her six-year term? Oh, that’s right, not only were no new jobs created whatsoever – the region actually lost 32,000 jobs. The greatest irony is that Clinton herself bragged about bringing Tata Consulting Services to Buffalo. For the record, that’s a company that helped companies in Upstate New York outsource many of those lost jobs to places like India.

I can’t say this comes as a surprise. Clinton has a childlike grasp of even the most fundamental, basic economic issues (and, yes, it’s even worse than McCain’s, and that’s saying something). Maybe she can impress us all with more economically ruinous ideas about a 5-year interest rate freeze.

-Quinn

Hmm strange Quinn, everyone is always talking about how great Hilary is in New York? And how well its doing. Can you give these news articles so I can read them.


He and a group of other men and women were supposed to find ways and ideas to show Iraqis how to cope with life after their freedom, get more on our side to want freedom, etc.

Before asking me a question, would it not be proper to first answer my own previously asked question? Now, once again, I ask you what the “iraq peace group” is and how Obama was in charge of it?

As for an article addressing Hillary’s promise to Upstate New York, here is one of many:

http://albany.bizjournals.com/albany...ditorial1.html

I don’t know if you watched it, but Tim Russert asked her about this specific issue during the debate he moderated between Clinton and Obama. Here’s an article that addresses when the promise was first made:

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLI...ate/index.html

Now, how about answering my question?

-Quinn

[MrsKellyPierce]

@Kelly

"AP is an Obama supporter". AP is a HUGE INTERNATIONAL news agency. Do you really think that thousands of people are behind Obama. C'mon. The voters have spoken and Obama is the winner. Fair and square.

As for those factory workers (This will be a bit of a history lesson for those who are not from the great state so listen up.)....

Would a senator , or senator Allen Keyes have done better? I don't think so. Those downstate towns were based around one factory or one industry and when they were no longer economically viable they went away. NO politician could have prevented that. * That's what you and I are really talking about. Our choice was between Obama and total idiots.



* FYI Jack Ryan had to drop out because of a sex scandal his Ex-wife. [urlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeri_Ryan=]Jeri Ryan who played 7 of 9 in Star Trek Voyager, accused him of trying to get her to go to swingers clubs. So psyched he was at being married to a woman like that. (she is built like a brick shit house as they say in the country)

No dear the delegates have spoken. Hilary still has the popular vote with over 17 million voting for her. If we are going to talk facts at least get them straight. And she still has the popular VOTE. Which says a lot.

[MrsKellyPierce]

Why becuase I can and will. I dont think Barack is ready to be President at this point nor do I agree with alot of his views. Hillary was and is the strongest person to be President. My options then are to do the following: not vote, Vote for Barack, Vote for McCain, or write in...........At this point I feel McCain is the stronger on International affairs and has more experience. Therefore my vote is for McCain.

I totally agree with this, Obama wasn't good at being a senator he was in charge of the iraq peace group and hardly attended any meetings, he is just not ready. How is he going to handle being President if he can't handle being a Senator?????????????????????????????? However I would not vote for Mccain.

What exactly is the "iraq peace group," and how was Obama in charge of it?

As for handling being a senator, you should look into Hillary's failure to keep her promise to Upstate New York. What happened to her detailed plan to create 200,000 jobs for Upstate New York during her six-year term? Oh, that’s right, not only were no new jobs created whatsoever – the region actually lost 32,000 jobs. The greatest irony is that Clinton herself bragged about bringing Tata Consulting Services to Buffalo. For the record, that’s a company that helped companies in Upstate New York outsource many of those lost jobs to places like India.

I can’t say this comes as a surprise. Clinton has a childlike grasp of even the most fundamental, basic economic issues (and, yes, it’s even worse than McCain’s, and that’s saying something). Maybe she can impress us all with more economically ruinous ideas about a 5-year interest rate freeze.

-Quinn

Hmm strange Quinn, everyone is always talking about how great Hilary is in New York? And how well its doing. Can you give these news articles so I can read them.


He and a group of other men and women were supposed to find ways and ideas to show Iraqis how to cope with life after their freedom, get more on our side to want freedom, etc.

Before asking me a question, would it not be proper to first answer my own previously asked question? Now, once again, I ask you what the “iraq peace group” is and how Obama was in charge of it?

As for an article addressing Hillary’s promise to Upstate New York, here is one of many:

http://albany.bizjournals.com/albany...ditorial1.html

I don’t know if you watched it, but Tim Russert asked her about this specific issue during the debate he moderated between Clinton and Obama. Here’s an article that addresses when the promise was first made:

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLI...ate/index.html

Now, how about answering my question?

-Quinn

Umm I did Quinn???????????????????? look at what you quoted. And they asked Obama about changing the bill that he had passed basically after being bought out.

[needsum]

quote]No dear the delegates have spoken. Hilary still has the popular vote with over 17 million voting for her. If we are going to talk facts at least get them straight. And she still has the popular VOTE. Which says a lot.[/quote]

Yes it does--it says a lot about how screwed up our political system really is. We can have a popular vote, but it counts for nothing compared with the electoral vote. So in other words, the people have not necessarily chosen their elected leaders. Such a great system we have here. Time to get out the broom for a clean sweep.