Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23
  1. #1
    Platinum Poster JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    52° 4' 60 N, 4° 17' 60 E
    Posts
    8,824

    Default Question for the Brits...........................

    Has Prince Harry serving in Iraq solidified his popularity in the UK over anyone else in the Royal Family besides the Queen?


    snɯıʇdo snʇoʇ soʌ oloʌ

  2. #2
    Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    950

    Default

    He served in Afghanistan.

    I don't know that the royal family is that popular really, and he is certainly not.

    Dressing up as a Nazi, and acting like a spoiled 'yah' will have that effect.

    Princess Di was the Royals' saving grace. They really messed up when they let her Charles dump her for ol' horse face Camilla.



  3. #3
    Platinum Poster BeardedOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic
    Posts
    7,343

    Default

    In the end, it's all relative, as it were.

    Camilla is the great-granddaughter of Alice Keppel, mistress of King Edward VII, Charles' great-great grandfather.


    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

  4. #4
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Its all relative, its a good move for him in the public opinion i think, makes a change to see them putting themselves out on a limb.. The royals are pretty popular from where im from in england though to be honest.



  5. #5
    Platinum Poster flabbybody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Queens, NYC
    Posts
    8,373

    Default

    Seems stupid to give the bad guys in Afghan a high profile target like Prince Harry.
    Why put the Royal kid in harm's way? The UK public already hate their government for sleeping with Bush and his crazy war



  6. #6
    5 Star Poster ezed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Boston-Cape Cod
    Posts
    2,012

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeardedOne
    In the end, it's all relative, as it were.

    Camilla is the great-granddaughter of Alice Keppel, mistress of King Edward VII, Charles' great-great grandfather.
    So that's why the long face! Ureakka!



  7. #7
    Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snh438
    Its all relative, its a good move for him in the public opinion i think, makes a change to see them putting themselves out on a limb.. The royals are pretty popular from where im from in england though to be honest.
    As you say...it's all relative.

    In New Zealand, where the queen is still head of state, the royal family are seen as quaint but archaic and pretty irrelevant. Still a good money earner for the UK.



  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flabbybody
    Seems stupid to give the bad guys in Afghan a high profile target like Prince Harry.
    Why put the Royal kid in harm's way? The UK public already hate their government for sleeping with Bush and his crazy war
    Not quite that simple mate.

    It is british tradition that members of the royal family go into the forces and serve.

    It was harry's choice to go to sandhurst officer school and look after his own troops. Harry himself wanted to go with his troops to afhanistan to serve. When you spend your time with people in the army, your other soldiers, you care for them, harry is their officer and he wanted to make sure he fullfilled his duty to be their officer in afghanistan when they were sent.

    You could say that they become more of a target, or you could say that they will become a better fighting unit because they will have higher morale and more determination. If you were fighting back to back alongside royalty (the prince) then you are going to feel good. Morale will be sky high, these boys can deal with the taliban, so can harry!

    As for the war, it is only in the media that you see 'everyone' in britain is against it. This is not the case. The fact is that many people are pleased saddam has been removed, but the planning of the war was the disaster we have been sucked into. Nevertheless it is only the 'anti war' people who have the biggest mouths, thats why it is blurted in the media so much.

    Much the same as the men who insist they are straight yet nothing makes them more happy than a big cock in their arse (sorry, as long as its a t-girl cock, as if theres a difference between male or t-girl cock?). These men are the most vocal of the ts admirers. Where as the guy who would rather pin that bitch onto her bed and grind into her arse for a good sex, these guys dont scream their heads off about 'how big is her cock', 'did she top you', 'how many inches', 'oooooh shes gorgeous, look at that sexy cock' etc etc, you know how it is

    Anyway, it was actually the american media who leaked the info. The british media knew that harry was in afghanistan but they made a pact that they would not leak the info because it would be potentially dangerous for our troops, esspecially those under harry's command.

    Its just another example of the greedy fuckers in the media who couldnt care less about any soldiers (on the uk/usa side) that they endanger, but only care about making the report and getting the $$$.

    Just my opinion, hope that helps



  9. #9
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flabbybody
    Seems stupid to give the bad guys in Afghan a high profile target like Prince Harry.
    Why put the Royal kid in harm's way? The UK public already hate their government for sleeping with Bush and his crazy war
    Congrats on the yanks though for blowing his cover. No one knew he was there therefore he wasn't any more of a target than the rest. Now thanks to those across the pond he is. Real smooth.



  10. #10
    Professional Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    THe story i read was leaked by some of your well restrained, British tabloid insiders actually to German Bild then to the "yank" media...



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •