Results 1 to 10 of 15
Thread: Clinton vs. Romney
-
01-16-2008 #1
Clinton vs. Romney
I have a real fear that the upcoming presidential election will be between these two monumental douche bags. IMO, one would be hard pressed to find a set of candidates that so clearly exemplify machine politics and the disingenuous pandering that has become the coin of the realm. Oh well, maybe Bloomberg will run as an independent.
-Quinn
Life is essentially one long Benny Hill skit punctuated by the occasional Anne Frank moment.
-
01-16-2008 #2
The only republican candidate that could beat Clinton is Dr. Paul. This is true because if she runs against anybody else, she will run as the antiwar candidate. Well, we all know this isn't true because she's not. She couldn't take this stance against Paul, because Paul is the TRUE antiwar candidate... (79% of Americans are against the war and she knows this)
Everybody will be like "Hillary will end war, vote for her",yada yada. She's a lying scumbag and will play this false antiwar savior. She's a warhawk and this is why she was funded the greatest by defense contractors and weapon makers out of any candidate, they all know what happens behind the black curtain..
Originally Posted by sexyshana
-
01-16-2008 #3Originally Posted by El Nino
-
01-16-2008 #4
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- most 3rd world city in america.
- Posts
- 1,591
yeah a romney vs clinton presidential race would suck...big money douche bags,all part of the big money oligarchy getiing us 20 or more yrs of bush,clintonbushclinton...romney i feel is the worst of all candidates..i was hoping the dems is michigan would have some sense and get out and vote in the repug primary to help huckabee win..further addin to the demise of the gay ol pederast party machine......
-
01-17-2008 #5
Re: Clinton vs. Romney
Originally Posted by Quinn
-
01-17-2008 #6
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- under sail
- Posts
- 1,032
Re: Clinton vs. Romney
Originally Posted by Quinn
And he has repeatedly stated that he plans on being Mayor of NYC until January1, 2009 so he'll be needing something to occupy his time.
-
01-17-2008 #7
Don't count Obama out. Clinton is a BIG waste of time. Obama still has a VERY strong chance and the Clinton's know that - hence the ridiculous personal attacks.
The republicans don't have a strong front runner. This is the most divided I have EVER seen the Republican party.
-
01-17-2008 #8This is the most divided I have EVER seen the Republican party.
Hillary's hawkishness bothers me, but I don't think she's nearly as rabid as John McCain. If she does become President, & that's looking more & more likely, it'll be fun to watch the republicans come unglued. Nobody sends them into a tizzy the way she does.
"You can pick your friends & you can pick your nose, but you can't wipe your friends off on your saddle."
~ Kinky Friedman ~
-
01-17-2008 #9
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- The United States of kiss-my-ass
- Posts
- 8,004
If Hillary got the dem nod instead of Obama, I personally would have no problems with voting for her instead of any possible GOP candidate. The GOP's stance on issues such as stem cell research and so-called "creative design" are enough to stop me from voting for a GOP candidate. I'm not going to speculate on Bloomberg, or whether I might vote for him, until he actually gets into the race.
"I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity." - Poe
-
01-17-2008 #10
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- The United States of kiss-my-ass
- Posts
- 8,004
Or is it "intelligent design?" Whatever, it's BS either way...
"I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity." - Poe