Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: PENIS ISSUES

  1. #21
    Banned again for being a jizzmop, oh well! Gold Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,911

    Default

    I think it's kinda interesting that this whole "specific anatomical part=gender identity" issue always centers on a persons cock.

    You just don't hear "I'd never be into a girl with a flat chest, because a Real Girl has tits! If a guy digs a girl without boobs, you can just call him Liberache!" or "That girl has a flat butt! Stay away from that Man Ass, ya old fruit!"

    And beyond that, I'm willing to bet in the not too distant future, all these silly labels will soon dissapear for the most part.

    Gay, Straight, Bi will all just become People, doing whatever the hell they feel like doing.



  2. #22
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    15

    Default

    I really can't see any male that gets sexually excited by a penis as being totally straight.

    The society that we live in views any intimacy between men as taboo.



    Remember this photo? It circulated widely among some of the blogs I frequent. Holding hands in Saudi Arabia is a sign of trust and friendship, and has nothing to do with homosexually. Saudi Arabia is a country that still beheads gay people. But this photo caused such a stir that the White House felt the need to release a statement.
    So this is what we have been fed all of our lives. Any intimacy between men is taboo. So maybe this is where the attraction for Transsexual MtoF's stems. While I know of no genetic or biological reason that some people are attracted to the opposite sex, I do know that it is not a choice. It occurs natrually in a small percent of the population. Maybe people who are attracted to MtoF's have homosexual tendencies but because of social taboos refuse to admit it even to themselves.

    By the way, I didn't join this forum just to rag on you guys. To quote a famous saying, " I just buy Playboy for the articles, Yeah, right."



  3. #23
    Banned again for being a jizzmop, oh well! Gold Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,911

    Default

    I've said this before on a couple other forums/blogs, but I actually do read Playboy for the articles. This is the age of the internet, and porn is everywhere. Does anybody actually pick up that magazine, in this day and age, for the purpose of jacking off?

    I guess I can imagine some uptight, sexually repressed middle aged guy in the suburbs doing that. Stashing the old issues away from his wife in a corner of the garage. Strange. And I'm not saying the girls aren't hot, but come on, it's more like art then porn.

    And it does have pretty good articles.

    Well, to each their own.



  4. #24
    Junior Poster rocklob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    378

    Default

    honda
    I think it's kinda interesting that this whole "specific anatomical part=gender identity" issue always centers on a persons cock.
    It's all about the phallus, whether in its literal form, the cocks we all get so excited about here, or in the symbolic form, i.e. the crisis about identity that same getting hot about cocks crerates in some of us. The phallus is the symbolic center and arbiter of power in our society. Getting, maintaining and declaring that power is at the heart of every ritual of masculinity from didgeball to the presidency. So i guess it's no wonder that the threat of surrendering the phallic control to people who otherwise glorify their femininity will always be threatening to some men.

    I think the heart of the conflict is between the purely sexual pleasure principle and the gender identity issue in its rerlationship to power within our society.

    Personally I have always believed in the orientation fluidity idea.



  5. #25
    Platinum Poster Ecstatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Central Massachusetts
    Posts
    6,354

    Default

    "orientation fluidity idea" - isn't that a flux capacitor?!



  6. #26
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rocklob
    honda
    I think it's kinda interesting that this whole "specific anatomical part=gender identity" issue always centers on a persons cock.
    It's all about the phallus, whether in its literal form, the cocks we all get so excited about here, or in the symbolic form, i.e. the crisis about identity that same getting hot about cocks crerates in some of us. The phallus is the symbolic center and arbiter of power in our society. Getting, maintaining and declaring that power is at the heart of every ritual of masculinity from didgeball to the presidency. So i guess it's no wonder that the threat of surrendering the phallic control to people who otherwise glorify their femininity will always be threatening to some men.

    I think the heart of the conflict is between the purely sexual pleasure principle and the gender identity issue in its rerlationship to power within our society.

    Personally I have always believed in the orientation fluidity idea.
    I would have to agree with you on that last line, as my orientation has been anything but static during my lifetime. I grew up in a conservative Christian home in the deep south and didn't, surprisingly, start flexing my sexual wings until I entered the navy. During my time in the navy I developed a sexual appetite for just about anything on two legs. After my tour of duty I returned home, and returned to my conservative Christian lifestyle. I did the "marriage, have kids" thing for a while. Now I am divorced, an atheist, and I haven't quite figured out who or what I am.



  7. #27
    Junior Poster rocklob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    378

    Default

    "orientation fluidity idea" - isn't that a flux capacitor?!
    Which is why, ecstatic, one should never drive above 88 unless one has properly defined one's sexuality.



  8. #28
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    61

    Default Re: Can a guy be a lesbian?

    The difference between, say, Brad Pitt, and Danielle Foxx is more than just body type. Put the two together (and I'm sure that Danielle would love that) and there is no comparison. Brad is a handsome guy, even I'll admit that, but if he ever came up to me wearing only his boxers and a grin, I'd make like Carl Lewis with wings and get the hell out of there. Now if Danielle wants to come up and see me some time, the doors open.







    Here! Here!



  9. #29
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18

    Default

    well from spending just a short time reading up on these posts here is the absolute final answer to the TS/Gay question.

    If you Bottom, then you are Gay
    If you give a BJ to a TS, then you are Bi
    If you Top, then you are Straight
    - Unless you do a reach-around, then you are Bi-Curious.

    If you give a BJ to a TS and her dick is bigger then yours, then you are Gay.

    If a TS blows you, you are Straight
    - Unless you are blowing her at the same time (i.e.69), then the 2 BJ's cancel each other out. Go back and hire another escort.
    - As in the case of a 69 - Unless again she cums first, then you are gay.

    Rimming a TS while you can see her dick, then you are gay
    Rimming a TS and her dick is not in plain view, i.e. she covers it with her hand, then you are straight.

    i think that just about covers it.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •