Results 21 to 29 of 29
Thread: Awe
-
12-08-2007 #21
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- holding it together
- Posts
- 4,555
Originally Posted by alphanumeric
-
12-08-2007 #22
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- BC, Canada
- Posts
- 293
Originally Posted by Night Rider
God save me from stupid people...
-
12-08-2007 #23
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- holding it together
- Posts
- 4,555
Originally Posted by alphanumeric
-
12-08-2007 #24
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 1,216
Originally Posted by Night Rider
Originally Posted by Night Rider
A dog has it's tail docked before it can even open it's eyes, so it's not going to know any different. Incase you aren't aware dogs can't have conversations with each other about why one has a tail and why one doesn't! Dogs are not going to feel insecure about having no tail, infact it can be beneficial.
Talking about humans getting their ears cut off is a comlpetely different story.
plus it was just an extreme example to show you how uttely bereft of any good thinking your comparison of grooming and docking was
Elvis: I was dreamin'. Dreamin' my dick was out and I was checkin' to see if that infected bump on the head of it had filled with pus again. If it had, I was gonna name it after my ex-wife 'cilla and bust it by jackin' off.
-
12-08-2007 #25
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- holding it together
- Posts
- 4,555
Originally Posted by Night Rider
you've just contradicted yourself, because it was you that compared docking a dogs tail to cutting a childs ears off at birth.....
Originally Posted by Night Rider
You keep using the word "mutilation as if you're taking the dogs head off, get a grip.
A dog has it's tail docked before it can even open it's eyes, so it's not going to know any different. Incase you aren't aware dogs can't have conversations with each other about why one has a tail and why one doesn't! Dogs are not going to feel insecure about having no tail, infact it can be beneficial.
Yes, I have noticed but making it shorter will not have any effect on its behaviour or well-being. They still shake their ass like they have a tail.
Talking about humans getting their ears cut off is a comlpetely different story.
plus it was just an extreme example to show you how uttely bereft of any good thinking your comparison of grooming and docking was
Now this is the most pathetic statement that you've made "most people that own rottweilers are dicks"......Why would that be, elaborate? They're not bread for fighting and they are generally a friendly dog so until you know what the fuck you are talking about, continue to have an intimate relationship with your poodle/chiwawa or whatever dog that a faggot like you would have.
[/quote]
-
12-08-2007 #26
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 1,216
Originally Posted by Night Rider
2) as i said myself it was a flawed extreme comparison to illustrate how illogical it was of you to put grooming and docking on the same level
You keep using the word "mutilation as if you're taking the dogs head off, get a grip.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutilation
applies just fine to docking
Yes, I have noticed but making it shorter will not have any effect on its behaviour or well-being. They still shake their ass as if they don't have a tail.
Now this is the most pathetic statement that you've made "most people that own rottweilers are dicks"......Why would that be, elaborate?
or whatever dog that a faggot like you would have.
and btw learn how to quote properly
Elvis: I was dreamin'. Dreamin' my dick was out and I was checkin' to see if that infected bump on the head of it had filled with pus again. If it had, I was gonna name it after my ex-wife 'cilla and bust it by jackin' off.
-
12-08-2007 #27
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- holding it together
- Posts
- 4,555
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutilation [lol, you can't give a link about human mutilation ans write beside it "applies just fine to docking"]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docking..._dogs.27_tails I've no time to read this as I've read some discussions in the past. This is arguments against docking, not facts. I've been brought up by a dog obsessed family and it's only the people outside of the dog scene (that don't have a clue) argue against it.
muhmuh wrote:
ran out of options and tried to pull that card? nice try too bad it doesnt work on me
Everytime you write back, you contradict yourself. You said most people that own a rottwieler are dicks and that was my response.
I'm not going to argue back and forth with you about a painless act in docking a dogs tail. I suppose you're a vegeterian and a charity worker, because if you're not then you've alot more to do to be Mr. Perfect before you worry about tail docking.
Go and give your dog a walk...
-
12-08-2007 #28
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 1,216
still unable to quote huh?
Originally Posted by Night Rider
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docking..._dogs.27_tails I've no time to read this
This is arguments against docking, not facts.
I've been brought up by a dog obsessed family and it's only the people outside of the dog scene (that don't have a clue) argue against it.
Everytime you write back, you contradict yourself. You said most people that own a rottwieler are dicks and that was my response.
Elvis: I was dreamin'. Dreamin' my dick was out and I was checkin' to see if that infected bump on the head of it had filled with pus again. If it had, I was gonna name it after my ex-wife 'cilla and bust it by jackin' off.
-
12-08-2007 #29
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- holding it together
- Posts
- 4,555
You're nuts! I told you that I'm not going to argue back and forth with some overly sensitive poof about tail docking. I've said all I wanted to say and I won't change your mind, and you won't change my mind, so why keep going on about it. As I've said I've no time to read your shite but if you're interested in the subject, here's a link...
http://www.cdb.org/faqs.htm