Results 31 to 40 of 54
Thread: My thoughts on AVN / TS Awards
-
12-04-2007 #31
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 4,911
Originally Posted by seanchai
Actually, that was your idea awhile ago. Let's do it. Why not?
-
12-04-2007 #32
Re: hmmm
Originally Posted by WendyWilliams
If you (or Gia or Joanna) truly believed you were the best performers in your productions that year and that you deserved to win an AVN award, then I'd have no issue under the current way it seems to be ran, for you nominating yourself.
This is why it needs a more independant body. There should be a cap on the amount of nominees a year also - no more than 5 in any one category.
-
12-05-2007 #33
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 145
Something about the phrase "stretched the boundaries of porn" really got me into this thread.
Anyway, we just want to see you girls having fun, being safe & getting paid. Keep it moving!
-
12-05-2007 #34
I think Jennifer Paris could push the industry forward if she went public with her dick!
-
12-05-2007 #35
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- not here
- Posts
- 7,128
a nomination doesnt equal a win... so why the confussion or bitching about how someone gets nominated? if they win from that nomination obviously the people w/ power felt the nomination was accurate, right? so stfu.
wanna see what i'm up to this week?
http://www.youtube.com/tsntx
http://www.gayborhood.tv/shows.cfm?view=2
-
12-05-2007 #36
I AGREE WITH VICKI, I'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO GIVE DANIELLE MY SPOT. SHE'S AN AMAZING PERFORMER ABOVE ANYONE ON THAT LIST. I'M VERY HONORED TO BE NOMINATED BUT CAN'T BATHE MYSELF IN ITS GLORY BECAUSE I QUESTION THE LEGITIMACY OF THE FAIRNESS OF THAT LIST.
AND AS FOR BUCK, I DON'T FEEL THAT'S IT'S FAIR HE'S COMPETING AGAINST THE GIRLS. MAYBE AN AWARD OF RECOGNITION ON ITS OWN OR SOMETHING. THERE'S NO FAIR WAY TO COMPARE HIS WORK AND OURS. HIS VIDEOS AND UNIQUENESS IS A WHOLE DIFFERENT MARKET
We all have something to say. Don't forget that we are a family.
-
12-05-2007 #37Originally Posted by seanchai
http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=nominees
The performer of the year is absolutely about the accomplishments of a performer over the span of the year. It is not a solitary sex scene award. They have those.
Your comments about the bareback scenes are fair. However, it wasn't so long ago that TS could only work with condoms like a lot of gay enterprise. Now we are working with popular GG performers on equal footing with other male and female performers... not like a third class. If we were confined to working with condoms whenever we worked with these people, while they openly worked bareback with fellow performers in the "straight" world, what does that say about TS? To me is says, "disease ridden 2nd class filth". So yes, it does push the genre forward. Of course it doesn't make someone the best just because they do this, but I think you would be hard pressed to convince anyone that the fans don't want to see it... or prefer to see it. What is a performer's job if not to please the fans? Safety is important, but I put full trust in an AIM test - which has proven equally reliable to condoms (percentage-wise, per sex act) in preventing the spread of HIV.
-
12-05-2007 #38Originally Posted by tsntx
-
12-05-2007 #39
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 4,911
"Where is my trash can" is actually a pretty good title for a movie.
-
12-05-2007 #40Originally Posted by Vicki Richter
I've never read anywhere that the Best Performer is for a body of work (or that it's for a single scene) and would love to see the clarification of this although I doubt AVN would publish this, as it would affect their otherwise, biased judgement.
It's a fair point on the condom scenes - I'm actually for the opposite, I still think most porn should be condomed. It might not be exactly what the fans want but if they weren't given the choice, then they wouldn't think that it was acceptive and normal to have risky sex without a condom.
I don't have the facts but I can't believe an AIM test is as safe as condoms. All it takes is that performer to have sex with an infected individual after the test but before the performance.
seanchai