To a Fascist, ALL Americans are Terrorists

[thx1138]

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com...ricans-as.html

[danaleigh]

ofcourse americans are terrists if you remeber the revalution that gave birth to the US it was the frist guilla war in history and the lead up was eaten up with the acts of a band of terrorists call the sons of liberty so by history and birth right all americans are terrorists and we should be proud of this fact

[NewYorker]

ofcourse americans are terrists if you remeber the revalution that gave birth to the US it was the frist guilla war in history and the lead up was eaten up with the acts of a band of terrorists call the sons of liberty so by history and birth right all americans are terrorists and we should be proud of this fact

It was not the first guerilla war in history. Guerilla wars have been fought for ages, dating back to the B.C. period, whenever a small army has been faced with overcoming a much larger force.

[Lovelorn]

It's one of the oldest and best forms of political attack. You accuse your opponents of giving succour to the enemy during wartime, therefore putting them on the defensive. It works best (obviously) in deeply patriotic country's like the U.S.

The fact that the allegation is almost invariably false and offensive is of no concern to the mouth pieces of the accusers, all that counts is slinging enough mud as quickly as possible, with the hope that sufficient sticks. Thereby damaging the reputation of the target and simultaneously deflecting at least some attention off the accuser.

Oh and I'm not going to get into that 1776 business, to many bad memories.

L.

[Oli]

It's one of the oldest and best forms of political attack. You accuse your opponents of giving succour to the enemy during wartime, therefore putting them on the defensive. It works best (obviously) in deeply patriotic country's like the U.S.

The fact that the allegation is almost invariably false and offensive is of no concern to the mouth pieces of the accusers, all that counts is slinging enough mud as quickly as possible, with the hope that sufficient sticks. Thereby damaging the reputation of the target and simultaneously deflecting at least some attention off the accuser.

Oh and I'm not going to get into that 1776 business, to many bad memories.

L.

So, Lovelorn, exactly when did you stop beating your wife?

[NewYorker]

It's one of the oldest and best forms of political attack. You accuse your opponents of giving succour to the enemy during wartime, therefore putting them on the defensive. It works best (obviously) in deeply patriotic country's like the U.S.

The fact that the allegation is almost invariably false and offensive is of no concern to the mouth pieces of the accusers, all that counts is slinging enough mud as quickly as possible, with the hope that sufficient sticks. Thereby damaging the reputation of the target and simultaneously deflecting at least some attention off the accuser.

Oh and I'm not going to get into that 1776 business, to many bad memories.

L.

Who said he stopped?

So, Lovelorn, exactly when did you stop beating your wife?